Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HuskiesAllDay, post: 2206816, member: 3494"] We had wayyyy too much talent on that team to finish 6th in the American. Behind Cinci, Tulsa, Houston, Smu, and Temple (reverse order- temple finished 1st). We had more talent than any of those teams. And a good mix of senior experience and younger guys. guards and bigs. No excuses at all for that result. Losing to a 1 seed in the second round isn't a bad result. The bad result was finishing 6th in the American and putting ourselves in position to lose to the 1 seed in the second round because we were an 8/9 seed. That season is so overrated by people on this board simply because we beat Colorado in the first round of the NCAA tournament. With the talent we had and considering our schedule, we should have been a 4 seed at the absolute worst. Was it a bad season? No? But was it a good season? Also no. We under-performed quite a bit. [/QUOTE]