ConnHuskBask
Shut Em Down!
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 9,192
- Reaction Score
- 34,369
The ratings are higher than many men's sports games in bball and fball. So if the money is piddling, then why pay for football or bball?
Not all the women's games, but the top games against top ranked teams can do a 1.5 rating nationally. Looks small. Until you realize the vast majority of men's games do a .5
So if I'm to ignore the 1.5 as immaterial (your words), then why should I value the .5 at all?
I'm strictly talking about the sport as it pertains to CR.
If we are hands down the top brand, the top draw and always in the hunt, then how come it hasn't been a factor at all?
If we were similar to Pitt, in that decision or close to Louisville,etc. Or now with the Big12, if it mattered at all, we may have gotten a bump.
It's football, cable boxes, football recruiting and then to a lesser extent men's hoops.
Not sure why you and others are trying to say otherwise. Give me one example where a AD as a whole has impacted any decision. It simply doesn't matter.