UConn Athletic Dept continues to hemorrhage money; Benedict, Edsall, Auriemma and Hurley continue to get massive raises | The Boneyard

UConn Athletic Dept continues to hemorrhage money; Benedict, Edsall, Auriemma and Hurley continue to get massive raises

Nothing new here. This is the case with every major D1 program in the country. If you want to attract good candidates at the coaching and administrative level, you need to pay them a competitive salary.
Agreed. I guess my question is whether the expectation at the other major D1 schools is that their athletic departments will operate at a budget deficit in the tens of millions of dollars.

And yes I understand that Covid has had an impact.

It was just staggering to me to see the numbers.

Oh and sign me up for getting paid a bonus equal to Geno’s every time the women’s team wins a conference championship and makes the NCAAs.
 
.-.
Understood- but we are all paying for 4 Presidents in 5 years. How many other major Universities have had this kind of turnover?
Not a good look......
Agreed. There is a problem.

And part of that problem is the attitude of many we have no right to question it; nor should we care how much money it is costing us, or how that money is being spent.
 
.-.
P5 schools have $40M paychecks coming in every year. If they didnt, 99% of them would have the exact same issue we have. Half of those schools got lucky they stumbled ass backwards into a major conference. What have schools like Wake Forest, Northwestern, etc done to deserve that money? Nothing.
 
Understood- but we are all paying for 4 Presidents in 5 years. How many other major Universities have had this kind of turnover?
Not a good look......
Can’t imagine very many…. UConn had had poor leadership for some time now, kind of amazing the amount of success they’ve had in spite of it. UConn is a unicorn for so many reasons, there just aren’t many major universities who ended up where UConn did.
 
P5 schools have $40M paychecks coming in every year. If they didnt, 99% of them would have the exact same issue we have. Half of those schools got lucky they stumbled ass backwards into a major conference. What have schools like Wake Forest, Northwestern, etc done to deserve that money? Nothing.
Yep, some got lucky, and some outworked others to get the P5 invites that generate those paychecks.

Everyone was sleeping when one of our ADs in particular got outworked; but some apparently believe it’s best for us to remain asleep.
 
UCLA ran a 62.5 million dollar deficit last year and over 100 million over the last three years.

Thank you for posting. I am genuinely curious how what has happened to our athletic budget compares to other D1 state schools.
 
.-.
One thing also worth remembering a chunk of the deficit is the charge to the athletics department for the cost of full, unaided (i. e. no federal need based reimbursement for those students) out of state tuition for each scholarship. The actual cost to the school to bring those student athletes in is much lower. In the process it adds ‘revenue’ for that full unaided tuition to other department budgets at the university
 
Amazingly, his point appears to be that it's wrong to even evaluate or discuss the performance of state employees whose salaries we are funding.
Maybe he lives in another state so it doesn’t concern him. This is a big point of discussion because this can’t continue like this. It’s going to end badly and probably end UConn athletics as we know it
 
I prefer athletic departments that have half a clue
Virtually every major program runs a decent deficit in the country and football has a lot to do with it. The idea that UConn doesn’t run a really good athletic program is dead wrong. Football has been an obvious outlier. Baseball, basketball, hockey representative, soccer, sports you probably pay no attention to like track and field Tons of schools would love to have the overall success of our programs.
 
Maybe he lives in another state so it doesn’t concern him. This is a big point of discussion because this can’t continue like this. It’s going to end badly and probably end UConn athletics as we know it
They have to execute, the margin of error is just smaller now because they aren’t getting these infusions of cash like the P5 schools get. Sure would make the equation easier if you’re getting $30-50 million payouts.
 
.-.
As long as universities refuse to add the value of earned media to the value of athletics, their true value is vastly under rated.
Nailed this. UConn’s transition from in-state safety school to selective, well ranked university correlates extremely well with the rise of the basketball programs and the profile they provided the university.
 
One thing also worth remembering a chunk of the deficit is the charge to the athletics department for the cost of full, unaided (i. e. no federal need based reimbursement for those students) out of state tuition for each scholarship. The actual cost to the school to bring those student athletes in is much lower. In the process it adds ‘revenue’ for that full unaided tuition to other department budgets at the university

And the Rent the state university pays to the state to play football at the Rent and for basketball and hockey to use the XL center.
 
Virtually every major program runs a decent deficit in the country and football has a lot to do with it. The idea that UConn doesn’t run a really good athletic program is dead wrong. Football has been an obvious outlier. Baseball, basketball, hockey representative, soccer, sports you probably pay no attention to like track and field Tons of schools would love to have the overall success of our programs.
Then why are we where we are?
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,633
Messages
4,587,049
Members
10,497
Latest member
Orlando Fos


Top Bottom