Charlie Creme put out his 1st "Friday Edition" of Braketology today...and says he'll put out new ones every Tuesday and Friday for the rest of the season. In this week's attempt Charlie continues to have UCONN as a 2 seed, and based on S Curve evalutation, the #7 overall seed. Again, perhaps this is just his attempt at getting clicks and riling up the UCONN Fan base, but this makes essentially Zero sense.... and comes soon after UCONN gets Azzi back and blows out a 14-1 SJU team by 30 points on the road.
Facts that make Charlie's ranking of UCONN highly suspect:
Poll/Source UCONN Ranking
AP 4
Coaches 4
Massey 3
NET 2
NCAA Power Rank 4
ESPN Writers Projections for Final 4... 3 of 3 writers project UCONN to make final 4 in 2023
As I have said before... these Bracketologies from CC are cute...mindless, and aggravating,,, but cute... AND most importantly, THEY MEAN NOTHING at this point in the Season... in fact they won't matter when the Committee sits to make their NCAA Tournament Seating decisions.
SORRY CHARLIE ... Your BIAS is showing... might want to fix that.
Playing
(Blue) Devil’s advocate …
The NCAA Evaluation Tool (NET) includes more components than just winning percentage. It takes into account game results, strength of schedule, game location, scoring margin, net offensive and defensive efficiency, and the quality of wins and losses.
In other words, NET ranking is determined by who you played, where you played, how efficiently you played, and the result of the game. The AP & Coaches’ polls are not factored into the analysis, nor are the ESPN NCAA power rankings nor the ESPN Final Four predictions.
Yes, UConn is #2 in the latest NET rankings (
through games played as of January 12, 2023). If you look at UConn’s remaining Big East games, only three (two against Villanova, one against Creighton) involve teams currently ranked in the top 40 of NET , with five remaining games (Georgetown X2, Butler, Providence, Xavier) against teams not in the top 110 of the NET rankings.
Right now, for example, the Big Ten has eight teams in the top 40 in NET (and Charlie Creme had both Indiana and Ohio State as #1 seeds). The opportunities for quality wins against strong opponents is significantly greater – and Ohio State and Indiana are less hurt by a loss to such a quality opponent.
One can look to TN to see the impact of a quality loss not being detrimental to a team’s chances in terms of NET rankings as of now. TN is ranked #17 in NET rating, despite six losses. Charlie Creme, however, has the Lady Vols as an #8 seed. Why? Perhaps it is TN’s remaining schedule. If you look at the Lady Vols’ remaining 12 games, six are against teams in the top 36 of the 1/12/2023 NET rankings – including three games against the top three in NET (South Carolina, UConn, and LSU). Even though the losses may be quality ones, having likely double digit losses entering the NCAA Tournament does not usually lend itself to a top-four/top-five seed.
Also, I am not sure how projecting UConn as a #2 seed but picking the Huskies to make the Final Four demonstrates a bias against UConn.
Chicken Cream says UConn will be in Final Four but is a #2 seed.
Something is wrong.. Between #1 and #2 one has to be out.
Which teams will reach the Final Four?
Creme: South Carolina, Stanford, UConn, LSU
Philippou: South Carolina, Stanford, UConn, Ohio State
Voepel: South Carolina, Stanford, UConn, LSU
Predicting a team to make the Final Four is not mutually exclusive with said team being one of the four #1 seeds. To wit:
- In 2022, UConn was the #2 seed in the Bridgeport Regional and made the Final Four.
- In 2019, UConn was the #2 seed in the Albany Regional and made the Final Four.