UCLA 2025 | Page 2 | The Boneyard

UCLA 2025

Huge game for UCLA in a few days. Heck huge game for both teams but since this is about UCLA, I will keep the conversation about UCLA. If they can beat Texas. That is going to be a huge boost for the UCLA players and their confidence. This should be a good game. Good luck, UCLA and to the UCLA fans.
 
UCLA is in this "Players Era Women's Championship" where if they win, they play the winner of Duke/SCar or if they lose to Texas, they play the loser of the aforementioned game. On Sunday, Nov 30, they play at home against Tennessee. That is a pretty impressive 3 game run in the 5 days. If UCLA goes undefeated, they will garner a lot of #1 votes and deservedly so.
 
Well, UCLA was soundly beaten today, I respect their 2nd half effort after being down by as many as 23 to close it to 4 before losing by 11. They played only 6 and will play tomorrow with who it looks like will be Duke.

I like the Bruin chances but with Cori you never know. At least she is going against another coach who seems to have no clue on offense or “in game adjustments”.
 
Well, UCLA was soundly beaten today, I respect their 2nd half effort after being down by as many as 23 to close it to 4 before losing by 11. They played only 6 and will play tomorrow with who it looks like will be Duke.

I like the Bruin chances but with Cori you never know. At least she is going against another coach who seems to have no clue on offense or “in game adjustments”.
I don't follow UCLA at all but I did watch them lose to Texas today. One thing I noticed during the fourth quarter and the game was getting really tight, during one of timeouts late, Cori wasn't in the players huddle, an assistant was doing the coaching. I mean Cori was on the outside of the huddle and IMO didn't look the least bit involved. Seemed very strange to me.
 
UCLA’s problem is that the other three teams in this tournament all have at least 3-5 players as or more athletic than UCLA’s best athlete (Jaquez). They’re decidedly the least athletic team of the top 5 national contenders.
 
UCLA’s problem is that the other three teams in this tournament all have at least 3-5 players as or more athletic than UCLA’s best athlete (Jaquez). They’re decidedly the least athletic team of the top 5 national contenders.

I remember thinking that Janiah Barker hurt South Carolina last year. Wasn't a big game from her points wise but felt she made a major impact.

I thought Kneepkens was really the one today that was trying to be impactful. I guess you have to say Rice as well to be fair. They really struggled to get the ball to Betts. Wasn't always clear how hard they were trying.
 
.-.
Hey @GoChips20 or @BruinGold, first and foremost Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours, second, is there a forum for UCLA sports that discusses WCBB as I am curious what that group of supporters has to say about the game yesterday against Texas?
Not that I’m aware of, but the WBB Reddit forum (r/NCAAW) typically has threads for big games that get more traffic than this board and I see several regular UCLA fans on there. BY and Reddit are far and away the best forums I know of though.
 
Not that I’m aware of, but the WBB Reddit forum (r/NCAAW) typically has threads for big games that get more traffic than this board and I see several regular UCLA fans on there. BY and Reddit are far and away the best forums I know of though.
I would agree with this assessment. Frankly, even mens' basketball doesn't get a ton of engagement. There are only around 4-6 regular commentators on the Women's team.
 
I would agree with this assessment. Frankly, even mens' basketball doesn't get a ton of engagement. There are only around 4-6 regular commentators on the Women's team.
Oh wow. Hopefully the numbers improve over time.
 
UCLA looking so much better against Duke, better ball movement, faster pace and better defense all without POY candidate Betts. Interesting this smaller lineup is dominating the “more athletic”Duke team albeit early in the 2nd Q 32-15
 
UCLA looking so much better against Duke, better ball movement, faster pace and better defense all without POY candidate Betts. Interesting this smaller lineup is dominating the “more athletic”Duke team albeit early in the 2nd Q 32-15
Good observation! They might be a better team without Betts. Playing small ball, their players are playing freer. They are more of a threat playing small ball IMHO!
 
.-.
Good observation! They might be a better team without Betts. Playing small ball, their players are playing freer. They are more of a threat playing small ball IMHO!
It will be interesting to see what UCLA looks like when Sienna Betts and Timea Gardiner return. Replace Lauren with Sienna and you may have a very similar look to the Thursday game, but with more depth.
 
LEGER-WALKER is on a mission. IMO …she’s the glue player for UCLA. She’s playing like an All American…that’s from New Zealand. 🤣
I do love her energy. She is fun to watch out there playing.
 
UCLA looking so much better against Duke, better ball movement, faster pace and better defense all without POY candidate Betts. Interesting this smaller lineup is dominating the “more athletic”Duke team albeit early in the 2nd Q 32-15
I mean it was Duke after all. Not sure what is going on with them.
 
I mean it was Duke after all. Not sure what is going on with them.
I hear ya, though I am tempted to report you to @triaddukefan for that snarky comment. UCLA did put a beat down on the Lady Vols on Sunday, which poses an interesting question, who was/is more over rated Duke or Tenn?
 

“We just have no boundaries at all,” Close said. “There’s no salary cap. There’s no competitive equity. And what’s happening is, the people that are losing I’m worried will slow down the growth of the game because it’s shutting out high school athletes. It’s really taking away their percentages of opportunities. And I don’t like it.”
“I have a responsibility to keep our program at a championship level and I don’t think I can do it with just freshmen anymore,” Close said.
Three of UCLA’s top six contributors are transfers as the program chases its first NCAA championship and a repeat Final Four. Its 2025 Final Four berth in Tampa was the first in the NCAA era for UCLA.
All six of them are seniors, creating a massive hole Close needs to fill. She said she can’t and won’t replace them with six freshmen, as she would have in the past with larger recruiting classes. Instead, Close and the coaching staff will enter the offseason seeking four to five transfers, with a smaller three-to-four-player freshman class.
“We have no interest in rebuilding,” Close said. “We really are intent on reloading. My responsibility is to adjust in the landscape that I’m given and to lead well no matter what. But the reality is, I have to do that whether I like it or not.”
 
.-.
I agree with much of what Coach Close said, but find some of it a little, I dunno, defeatist. How is paying players "shutting out high-school athletes? (I assume by high-school athletes she means recruits/freshmen?) It's not reducing the number of scholarships available, plus it's allowing them to be paid. It may be limiting where some high-schoolers want to go, but that's not limiting their opportunities.

Close also seems to be blaming the system for her own choices. With the plethora of transfers, there is more recruiting to be done during the season, but there are also two more coaches than a few years ago. But she's also needing to bring more players in, which will necessarily include transfers, because she has six seniors playing key roles this season. That's not the NCAAs fault, she constructed her team herself.

UCLA has loads of money, a $10B endowment, and many many wealthy grads. It's a great school in a desirable location. If they don't overload on upper-class transfers, they ought to be able to sign a lot of desirable freshmen recruits, although I see zero in the ESPN top 100 for 2026.
 
I agree with much of what Coach Close said, but find some of it a little, I dunno, defeatist. How is paying players "shutting out high-school athletes? (I assume by high-school athletes she means recruits/freshmen?) It's not reducing the number of scholarships available, plus it's allowing them to be paid. It may be limiting where some high-schoolers want to go, but that's not limiting their opportunities.

Close also seems to be blaming the system for her own choices. With the plethora of transfers, there is more recruiting to be done during the season, but there are also two more coaches than a few years ago. But she's also needing to bring more players in, which will necessarily include transfers, because she has six seniors playing key roles this season. That's not the NCAAs fault, she constructed her team herself.

UCLA has loads of money, a $10B endowment, and many many wealthy grads. It's a great school in a desirable location. If they don't overload on upper-class transfers, they ought to be able to sign a lot of desirable freshmen recruits, although I see zero in the ESPN top 100 for 2026.
I think Cori just announced why her team will continue to fall short. She will have zero chemistry that can't be achieved in a single season. Did she learn nothing from the beat down UCLA suffered at UConn's hands last season? She admitted that her team could not play at UConn's pace in the Final Four. This is her last shot to raise the pace of play of her team before all the starters go away. I seriously doubt she will succeed this season any better than she did last season.

Next season, Cori will bring in a half dozen (or more) transfers. I wonder how many of the existing recruits will bolt as a result. Currently, her roster for next season will consist of Sienna, Lena Bilic, Amanda Muse, Christina Karamouzi and maybe Timea (if she can get a waiver).

I also wonder how this year's starters think about this. Kiki and Gabriela are the only original recruits. Lauren and Angela transferred in 3 years ago. For Charlisse and Gianna, this is their first and last season in Bruin Blue. What sort of legacy will they cherish if the team dissolves immediately after they leave?
 
. . .
“We have no interest in rebuilding,” Close said. “We really are intent on reloading. My responsibility is to adjust in the landscape that I’m given and to lead well no matter what. But the reality is, I have to do that whether I like it or not.”

One wonders what are the financial constraints to Close's rebuilding project. UCLA Athletics is a financial dumpster fire, seemingly second only to Rutgers in the BIG. UCLA Athletics reported a department-wide operating deficiency of ($21,632,153) for fiscal year 2025. While all WBB programs lose money, UCLA WBB lost the most money ($7,683,011) in fiscal year 2025 of the 16 public schools in the BIG (excluding USC and Northwestern).
 
One wonders what are the financial constraints to Close's rebuilding project. UCLA Athletics is a financial dumpster fire, seemingly second only to Rutgers in the BIG. UCLA Athletics reported a department-wide operating deficiency of ($21,632,153) for fiscal year 2025. While all WBB programs lose money, UCLA WBB lost the most money ($7,683,011) in fiscal year 2025 of the 16 public schools in the BIG (excluding USC and Northwestern).
Every coach says "we're gonna reload." Only one I've seen do it, and she isn't in Los Angeles.

Top six players moving on is much more likely to become a midseason press conference after falling to 12-5 "we always knew it was going to be tough to replace last year's seniors..."
 
.-.
If she can recover, she'll be one of the most sought-after post players in the country (assuming she doesn't stick around Westwood for another season).
If she does enter the portal, she’ll be a coveted prospect for sure.
 

“We just have no boundaries at all,” Close said. “There’s no salary cap. There’s no competitive equity. And what’s happening is, the people that are losing I’m worried will slow down the growth of the game because it’s shutting out high school athletes. It’s really taking away their percentages of opportunities. And I don’t like it.”
“I have a responsibility to keep our program at a championship level and I don’t think I can do it with just freshmen anymore,” Close said.
Three of UCLA’s top six contributors are transfers as the program chases its first NCAA championship and a repeat Final Four. Its 2025 Final Four berth in Tampa was the first in the NCAA era for UCLA.
All six of them are seniors, creating a massive hole Close needs to fill. She said she can’t and won’t replace them with six freshmen, as she would have in the past with larger recruiting classes. Instead, Close and the coaching staff will enter the offseason seeking four to five transfers, with a smaller three-to-four-player freshman class.
“We have no interest in rebuilding,” Close said. “We really are intent on reloading. My responsibility is to adjust in the landscape that I’m given and to lead well no matter what. But the reality is, I have to do that whether I like it or not.”
I have looked hard at her roster all year and she will be so bereft of talent next year, she has to find a way to reload but I do think what @BigTenGuy said is really interesting. I am not sure how they include the NIL money so maybe their is that "hidden" bank account for Cori to use.

Sienna Betts is the only non Senior/grad getting any real playing time. She has 7 Seniors/Grads and Gardiner who is hurt and could come back or leave. She has Bilic and Muse as other players garnering some time but I am not thinking any of the 3 underclassman are good enough to consider "reloading" vs. "rebuilding". I never underestimate Cori's ability to sell "snow to an eskimo" but her task this off-season will be mighty tall.....
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,489
Messages
4,577,897
Members
10,487
Latest member
husky62


Top Bottom