You leave Alexis Morris at home and don't invite Didi Richards to USA trials and this is what you get. Just read a long post from Morris's mom and she was spot on. The selection committee has to do better with everything across the board.
Also....:.the game is changing and it is really hard for these big centers to keep up with the pace of the game. It is showing more and more these days.
I am sure her mom is an unbiased observer!
Every USA team that gets selected has been trashed by a certain number of observers, most of whom have specific connections to some of the players not selected, whether it be regional (bias against FL players!) or AAU affiliation, or whatever. Mostly the selected teams have won gold, but sometimes they stumble which is not surprising in single elimination tournaments (look at UEFA and Iceland and Wales for an example running currently.) With 100+ kids participating in the current format and a weekend to evaluate it is a really difficult situation for any committee. All college coaches over the last ten years or so have been complaining about the HS preparation of their incoming freshman - too many tournaments and games being played and not enough team practice, too much individual skills work and not enough integration in team concepts of defense and offense, too much me and not enough we. USA basketball ends up trying to make up for that in a week or ten days of practice. At the least the college coaches have months of practice and 4 years to work with their freshman.
I did not see in watching these games any issue with the 'bigs' keeping up with the speed of play - I did see lots of issues with team play including a lack of commitment to help defense, team rebounding, and passing. It did seem that the team might have been heavy on posts and light on wings, but not that significantly. The most glaring thing to my eye was a lack of structure in the team and that strikes me as a coaching issue - and this was the same coaching staff that was in place last year.
And as I mentioned before, I got a sense that there was an over-reaction to last year's bronze medal. In general these age specific teams and the national team believe in continuity - they do not get a lot of time each year to structure a team so they rely on the continuity of coaches and players year over year to build up a knowledge base. By dropping 10 of 12 players from the U16 team they threw away any carry-over and I do think that hurt this team. Last year's team played really well up until the semis and then played a stinker, but came back and played a really good bronze medal game - to reevaluate everything based on a weekend of trials this year seemed a little bit of overkill. A comparison of this year to last year I think would say that the U16 team performed better than the U17 team, and I suspect an unchanged team from last year would have performed better this year - not advocating that, but a team of 8 hold overs say and 4 new inclusions probably would have played better as a team just because of the experience gained last year.
On the national team - while they continue winning golds there is no need for them to qualify in the off years for the next WC/OLY competition, but I think USA basketball should start reconsidering that process. I believe there is no bar to them playing in the qualifying tournaments (should they win, the automatic qualifiers become the runner up teams) and keeping the national team pool together and competing would be a great way to integrate the younger players into the NT structure. That is going to become really important over the next 4 years.