Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hjoerring, post: 2686604, member: 3630"] Speaking of doing more with less, there is already a cacophony of voices out there saying that Uconn's winnings are based on having the best players. Some coaches (UT and others) have said there is little or no coaching demanded there-- what if he had to really coach. Some might even look at the last two years end results and smile. Now, were we to admit two graduate transfers as being discussed here, and if we were to run the table, how would the critics respond? Personally, I'm not in favour of this trend. Yet, I know nothing about these players. Why are they transfering? Could they not have entered this years draft? The schools (USC, Tenn., Uconn, etc) listed and visited are so varied that I am unsure of the driving force. Outside of Uconn are these schools not in the same Conf.? That's a touch one for the coaches! What is being sold here-- that we will develop them into Uconn type players? If so, why are they considering Tenn where not a single Boneyarder thinks 'development' is an option. Or is it: Come help us win a championship? But again, Collier and the incoming Fr. need skilled and good competition to go up against in practice-- maybe that is it. Hope it isn't "HAVE GUN WILL TRAVEL.....!" [/QUOTE]