Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Hans Sprungfeld, post: 4866429, member: 181"] Ah yes, that's the source. No forgetting, and I see what you did. Mine was genuine curiousity as to what others might be thinking after reading something far more direct, extreme, provocative, and inflammatory (and presumably less likely to be true) being posted with no equivocation whatsoever... primarily to see if anybody has been developing some sense of what might be worth pursuing as legally actionable or not (and why), beyond merely harnessing emotions about something and trying to round up support toward forging consensus opinions as to what's in questionable taste or propriety, when it shows up in via innuendo or supposition, under cover of plausibly claimed uncertainty about the story's veracity. It was either that, or adding a, "One bite, everybody knows the rules" quip. [/QUOTE]