Trying To Change The Media's Perception of UConn | The Boneyard

Trying To Change The Media's Perception of UConn

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
4,909
Reaction Score
18,466
I recently read an article by Pete Grayhoff of the Kansas City Star in which he evaluated all the potential BIG 12 candidates with a paragraph on each. Like many in the non-local media, he was pretty dismissive of UConn, but rather than simply respond in the comment section after the article I decided to send him a personal email to try and inform him about the value of UConn. I enclosed lots of Dooley's research and some of my own. I wanted to test whether I could actually reach the writer with a respectful critique, have him read it and then have him respond. It seemed to work as he responded tonight. Hopefully, we can still change the hearts and minds of the opinion makers.

From: "Grathoff, Pete" <pgrathoff@kcstar.com>
Sunday Feb 28, 2016 9:45pm
Subject: Re: BIG XII Expansion Candidate

Larry,

Thanks for writing. UConn is a more intriguing option than I believed. I didn't realize the TV numbers were so strong. It will be curious to see how this thing plays out.
I appreciate the note and that you took the time to read that piece.
Pete

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:05 AM

Pete,
I very much enjoyed your comprehensive article on the Big12 expansion candidates although you may have been a bit too dismissive of UConn as you analyzed what each school brought to the table. Please take a look at this data----especially how UConn benefits a BIG XII Network model and just how big an impact UConn has on the NYC viewing market. Don’t count out the Huskies just yet.
Thanks,
Larry


UConn TV/Markets
UConn would provide potential viewership into the following markets within a two hour driving radius.
http://www.tvb.org/media/file/2015-2016-dma-ranks.pdf
#1 New York (which includes Southwest CT) - 7.3M TV homes (6.5% of U.S.)
#8 Boston/Manchester - 2.4M TV homes (2.1% of U.S.)
#30 Hartford/New Haven - 945K TV homes (.8% of U.S.)
#52 Providence/New Bedford - 600K TV homes (.5% of U.S.)
#116 Springfield/Holyoke - 246K TV homes (.2% of U.S.)

Total potential reach: 11.4M TV homes

Conversely, here are how some of our competitors stack up (and I'm trying to be as liberal as possible). I consider Houston, Cincinnati, BYU, UCF, and USF as UConn's top competitors -
#10 Houston - 2.4M TV homes (2% of U.S.)
#11 Tampa/St.Pete - 1.9M TV homes (1.6% of U.S.)
#19 Orlando/Daytona - 1.5M TV homes (1.3% of U.S.)
#18 Cleveland/Akron - 1.5M TV homes (1.3% of U.S.)
#27 Indianapolis - 1M TV homes (1% of U.S.)
#31 Columbus, OH - 900K TV homes (.8% of U.S.)
#34 Salt Lake, UT - 885K TV homes (.7% of U.S.)**
#36 Cincinnati - 860K TV homes (.7% of U.S.)
#50 Memphis - 636K TV homes (.5% of U.S.)
#61 Ft Myers, FL - 505K TV homes (.4% of U.S.)
#63 Lexington, KY - 472K TV homes (.4% of U.S.)
#64 Dayton - 460K TV homes (.4% of U.S)
#77 Toledo - 400K TV homes (.3% of U.S.)

Total potential COMBINED reach (Houston, Cincinnati, UCF, and USF): 12.3M TV homes

**BYU should also be counted as there are a total of 6.46M LDS Church members in the U.S. http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/facts-and-statistics/country/united-states.When combined with the DMA of Salt Lake City, BYU brings a total potential reach of 7.2M TV homes.

CONCLUSION: UConn is the unquestioned #1 candidate for potential TV reach. Not every 11.4M TV home will watch UConn, but not every TV home listed in their respective demographics, including all 6.46M LDS members, will watch our B12 competition either. We are talking about potential TV reach which is important for any movement towards a B12 Network launch. If Texas decides who the 12th member will be (assuming that the "rumors" about Cincinnati being #11 is true), then we would bring the most potential TV homes to their Longhorn Network.

See below for UConn’s TV reach into NYC.

SNY Success With UConn Shows Potential For Big 12 Network In Northeast

The latest Big 12 expansion news came in on February 12th from a source close to the situation. The Chicago based firm, Navigate Research, hired by the Big 12 conference to assess potential additions for the league in conjunction with the launch of a conference television network, had finished their analysis and UConn was on the list of recommended additions. Naturally, there have been inquiries from Big 12 land and a number of them can be summed up by the following question; would UConn really bring the New York City market?
To answer this question, one does not need to look further than SNY. For those that reside outside of the northeast region, SNY or SportsNet New York, is the official television home of the New York Mets, New York Jets and all things New York sports. SNY is also the official TV home of the UConn Huskies Men’s and Women’s basketball programs, televising over 450 hours of UConn programming annually, including more than 20 live games. Included in those live games, are select football contests; this year’s season opener against Villanova being one of them. Founded by Sterling Entertainment Enterprises, Time Warner and Comcast, SNY is available to viewers throughout New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, and northeastern Pennsylvania, and nationally on DIRECTV, Verizon FiOS, Comcast Cable, and AT&T U-Verse.
For television executives at the Manhattan based network, the answer to the question, will UConn bring the New York market, was a resounding, yes. UConn and SNY began their relationship in 2010, focusing on football and men’s basketball coverage. In addition to games, the network produced pre and post-game shows, live, in-studio from Manahattan. Team previews, season recaps and game week football press conferences, broadcast live on-air, were part of the original agreement. Special features, including a Hard Knocks type documentary on UConn football premiered in 2012, during spring football. It was a success.
“SNY’s national footprint was a big selling point with the university,” SNY President Steve Raab said when first partnering with the Huskies. “All that programming is an incredible recruiting tool. We’ve always believed that creating a single destination – one that provides consistency as well as the most comprehensive, in-depth coverage for UConn fans, would result in increased visibility and popularity.”
In time for the 2012-13 season, SNY added more UConn content, paying an additional $4.55M over four years to lock in coverage of the women’s basketball program. That’s $4.55M for just the women’s program. It brought another facet of UConn athletics to the more than 14 million potential viewers.
Last night’s primetime lineup?
6:30 PM – UConn Women’s Pre-game
7:00 PM – UConn Women’s Basketball vs. Cincinnati
9:00 PM – UConn Women’s Post-game
9:30 PM – The Geno Auriemma Show
When the deal was signed to add women’s basketball to the programming already offered, Raab was ecstatic.
“It’s a really complete package,” Raab said. “I don’t know that there is another college program receiving this much attention.” Ironically, Raab was asked about the deal that the University of Oklahoma had signed with Fox Sports that brought 1,000 hours of sports programming to the local airwaves in the Sooner state. “That package doesn’t reach 14 million homes,” he responded. “We also own the worldwide rights to the UConn women and don’t have to black out programming, including games, to distributors out of market.” Ratings have only increased since the partnership expanded to include all three major programs at UConn. In 2014, one women’s basketball game alone, drew a 9.6 market share in the Hartford/New Haven DMA; the Huskies saw an 18% ratings increase on SNY that year. “We knew we would deliver UConn a broader national audience, but these substantial ratings gains across all of our UConn properties on a local level are another great development,” Raab added. “We are excited about the potential to grow the brand even more as we continue our partnership with the University.” What is even more impressive is the ratings increases have occurred since the Huskies moved from the Big East, to the perceived, lesser talented and less competitive American Athletic Conference. As we’ve moved into 2016, the UConn men’s hockey program has begun to receive exposure, with two live simulcasts appearing on SNY, in conjunction with the Hockey East television deal.
As assessments and comparisons among potential BIG XII expansion candidates continues, SNY is Exhibit A of why UConn is the most valuable option when looking at additions in conjunction with a Big 12 Network. If you think viewership is good when playing the likes of Tulsa, SMU and Tulane, imagine the possibilities and exposure in the northeast for Kansas, Texas and Oklahoma.

Before Tier 3 media rights became a thing of the past, UConn also stacked up with its P5 peers. UConn signed a Tier 3 media deal with IMG valued at $80M over 10 years, which, at the time, placed UConn in the top half of similar deal values. UConn also signed a Tier 3 media contract with SNY for women's basketball only, valued at $1.14M/yr. Combined, this put UConn's Tier 3 media rights well over $9M/yr which would be valued in the upper half of P5 member values. UConn also signed an apparel contract with Nike at around the same time as its IMG Tier 3 medial contract, and that contract was valued at $2.775M in 2014-15. This would put UConn at 27th, ahead of Cincinnati ($2.625M with Under Armour...which was signed more recently than UConn's deal). USF comes in at $1.67M with Under Armour; Houston at 500K with Nike; UCF, Memphis and BYU are not listed (but BYU likely has a comparable deal with Nike that UConn has).
 

Dooley

Done with U-con athletics
Joined
Oct 7, 2012
Messages
9,963
Reaction Score
32,822
Great job Nos!

Unfortunately for UConn, there is a lot of this around the country. There are many members of media/broadcast journalism (even inside our own market!) that just do not know the full value that UConn brings to a P5 conference. It seems that most people are willing to paint a broad, negative brush over UConn based upon the Paul Pasqualoni football tenure.

Hopefully, the intelligent folks who work at TV networks and inside the B12/B1G/ACC are able to sort through the hogwash narrative and get to the facts of the metrics. I've yet to see a single "study" from anyone that shows UConn as anything outside of a Top 2 candidate...in all metrics. Most of the "longshot" talk comes from opinion-based blowhards, like this Gresh guy, and other writers across the country, who probably watched UConn lose a football game in 2012-13 and have made up their mind based on that single event.

But the point remains: there are still scores of folks out there who have no idea that UConn ranks #1 in TV value, brand value, academic ratings, AD budget (expense/revenue), and athletic success. That is a shame.
 
Joined
May 27, 2014
Messages
2,814
Reaction Score
13,670
It would be awesome if someone could compile a master list of B12 presidents, ADs, media and such that we can all email before May to keep them more informed about what UConn brings to their conference. I know Dooley's already been doing this but Nostical's email shows how a simple email can go a long way to change one person's perception. At the very least it's worth a try...Kinda like voting, if you don't vote you shouldn't complain when things go wrong even if you live in a state where you know the result before it happens anyway.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
4,084
Reaction Score
11,737
If this reporter was a true JOURNALIST, he would verify Nosti's facts & then issue a retraction. He's a hack, so I won't hold my breath.
 
Joined
May 29, 2015
Messages
1,741
Reaction Score
7,580
If this reporter was a true JOURNALIST, he would verify Nosti's facts & then issue a retraction. He's a hack, so I won't hold my breath.

LOL a retraction? Seriously?

First of all, retractions are printed when the information published is incorrect. Just because you didn't like what the guy had to say, doesn't mean it's retraction worthy.

Secondly, retractions are incredibly rare in general. Something egregiously wrong has to be printed for that to happen.

We should be happy the guy was willing to admit he was wrong and that he accepted all of the information. Most reporters won't do that.

Good job, @Nostical , next time he writes on the topic he'll have more ammunition.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
84
Reaction Score
438
It would be awesome if someone could compile a master list of B12 presidents, ADs, media and such that we can all email before May to keep them more informed about what UConn brings to their conference. I know Dooley's already been doing this but Nostical's email shows how a simple email can go a long way to change one person's perception. At the very least it's worth a try...Kinda like voting, if you don't vote you shouldn't complain when things go wrong even if you live in a state where you know the result before it happens anyway.

Here is a list of some:
Directory | The University of Texas at Austin (university president)
Directory | The University of Texas at Austin (athletic director)
Kirk Bohls | www.statesman.com
OU Search (university president--you have to type David Boren in the space)
Oklahoma Staff Directory - Oklahoma Sooners (athletic director)
Berry Tramel | News OK Blogs
TEXASTECH.COM Kirby Hocutt Bio - Texas Tech University Official Athletic Site (athletic director)
Don Williams (@AJ_DonWilliams) | Twitter
Oklahoma State University Athletics - Staff Directory (president and athletic director addresses)
Baylor Law School || Faculty || Judge Ken Starr (university president email address)
On Campus - Baylor Official Athletic Site (athletic director email address)
Contacts | President E. Gordon Gee | West Virginia University (email address)
Staff Directory - WVU Athletics (athletic director, Shane Lyons)
TCU | Chancellor Victor J. Boschini, Jr.
GOFROGS.COM - School Info - TCU Horned Frogs Official Athletic Site (athletic director)
 
Last edited:

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,965
Reaction Score
208,754
I'd be hesitant to contact University Presidents. Presumably the University has already done that and has narrowly tailored professionally crafted message to convey.

Now, as to winning hearts and minds one reporter at a time? I'm 100% behind that effort.
 

CTMike

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
11,415
Reaction Score
40,749
I'd be hesitant to contact University Presidents. Presumably the University has already done that and has narrowly tailored professionally crafted message to convey.

Now, as to winning hearts and minds one reporter at a time? I'm 100% behind that effort.
Do you really want to email a university president and end up in an FOI request?
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
56,965
Reaction Score
208,754
Do you really want to email a university president and end up in an FOI request?
Less of issue, in my view, than having someone, inadvertently saying something to torpedo us. Unlikely since I can't imagine anyone in the presidents office would bother to read it, but why take that chance.

Sending bulk fan emails to university official is, in essence, spamming them. That rarely generates goodwill. Sending them to a reporter is fine however, IMO.
 

Athlete94

UCONNGRD
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Messages
662
Reaction Score
1,788
I recently read an article by Pete Grayhoff of the Kansas City Star in which he evaluated all the potential BIG 12 candidates with a paragraph on each. Like many in the non-local media, he was pretty dismissive of UConn, but rather than simply respond in the comment section after the article I decided to send him a personal email to try and inform him about the value of UConn. I enclosed lots of Dooley's research and some of my own. I wanted to test whether I could actually reach the writer with a respectful critique, have him read it and then have him respond. It seemed to work as he responded tonight. Hopefully, we can still change the hearts and minds of the opinion makers.

From: "Grathoff, Pete" <pgrathoff@kcstar.com>
Sunday Feb 28, 2016 9:45pm
Subject: Re: BIG XII Expansion Candidate

Larry,

Thanks for writing. UConn is a more intriguing option than I believed. I didn't realize the TV numbers were so strong. It will be curious to see how this thing plays out.
I appreciate the note and that you took the time to read that piece.
Pete

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:05 AM

Pete,
I very much enjoyed your comprehensive article on the Big12 expansion candidates although you may have been a bit too dismissive of UConn as you analyzed what each school brought to the table. Please take a look at this data----especially how UConn benefits a BIG XII Network model and just how big an impact UConn has on the NYC viewing market. Don’t count out the Huskies just yet.
Thanks,
Larry


UConn TV/Markets
UConn would provide potential viewership into the following markets within a two hour driving radius.
http://www.tvb.org/media/file/2015-2016-dma-ranks.pdf
#1 New York (which includes Southwest CT) - 7.3M TV homes (6.5% of U.S.)
#8 Boston/Manchester - 2.4M TV homes (2.1% of U.S.)
#30 Hartford/New Haven - 945K TV homes (.8% of U.S.)
#52 Providence/New Bedford - 600K TV homes (.5% of U.S.)
#116 Springfield/Holyoke - 246K TV homes (.2% of U.S.)

Total potential reach: 11.4M TV homes

Conversely, here are how some of our competitors stack up (and I'm trying to be as liberal as possible). I consider Houston, Cincinnati, BYU, UCF, and USF as UConn's top competitors -
#10 Houston - 2.4M TV homes (2% of U.S.)
#11 Tampa/St.Pete - 1.9M TV homes (1.6% of U.S.)
#19 Orlando/Daytona - 1.5M TV homes (1.3% of U.S.)
#18 Cleveland/Akron - 1.5M TV homes (1.3% of U.S.)
#27 Indianapolis - 1M TV homes (1% of U.S.)
#31 Columbus, OH - 900K TV homes (.8% of U.S.)
#34 Salt Lake, UT - 885K TV homes (.7% of U.S.)**
#36 Cincinnati - 860K TV homes (.7% of U.S.)
#50 Memphis - 636K TV homes (.5% of U.S.)
#61 Ft Myers, FL - 505K TV homes (.4% of U.S.)
#63 Lexington, KY - 472K TV homes (.4% of U.S.)
#64 Dayton - 460K TV homes (.4% of U.S)
#77 Toledo - 400K TV homes (.3% of U.S.)

Total potential COMBINED reach (Houston, Cincinnati, UCF, and USF): 12.3M TV homes

**BYU should also be counted as there are a total of 6.46M LDS Church members in the U.S. http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/facts-and-statistics/country/united-states.When combined with the DMA of Salt Lake City, BYU brings a total potential reach of 7.2M TV homes.

CONCLUSION: UConn is the unquestioned #1 candidate for potential TV reach. Not every 11.4M TV home will watch UConn, but not every TV home listed in their respective demographics, including all 6.46M LDS members, will watch our B12 competition either. We are talking about potential TV reach which is important for any movement towards a B12 Network launch. If Texas decides who the 12th member will be (assuming that the "rumors" about Cincinnati being #11 is true), then we would bring the most potential TV homes to their Longhorn Network.

See below for UConn’s TV reach into NYC.

SNY Success With UConn Shows Potential For Big 12 Network In Northeast

The latest Big 12 expansion news came in on February 12th from a source close to the situation. The Chicago based firm, Navigate Research, hired by the Big 12 conference to assess potential additions for the league in conjunction with the launch of a conference television network, had finished their analysis and UConn was on the list of recommended additions. Naturally, there have been inquiries from Big 12 land and a number of them can be summed up by the following question; would UConn really bring the New York City market?
To answer this question, one does not need to look further than SNY. For those that reside outside of the northeast region, SNY or SportsNet New York, is the official television home of the New York Mets, New York Jets and all things New York sports. SNY is also the official TV home of the UConn Huskies Men’s and Women’s basketball programs, televising over 450 hours of UConn programming annually, including more than 20 live games. Included in those live games, are select football contests; this year’s season opener against Villanova being one of them. Founded by Sterling Entertainment Enterprises, Time Warner and Comcast, SNY is available to viewers throughout New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, and northeastern Pennsylvania, and nationally on DIRECTV, Verizon FiOS, Comcast Cable, and AT&T U-Verse.
For television executives at the Manhattan based network, the answer to the question, will UConn bring the New York market, was a resounding, yes. UConn and SNY began their relationship in 2010, focusing on football and men’s basketball coverage. In addition to games, the network produced pre and post-game shows, live, in-studio from Manahattan. Team previews, season recaps and game week football press conferences, broadcast live on-air, were part of the original agreement. Special features, including a Hard Knocks type documentary on UConn football premiered in 2012, during spring football. It was a success.
“SNY’s national footprint was a big selling point with the university,” SNY President Steve Raab said when first partnering with the Huskies. “All that programming is an incredible recruiting tool. We’ve always believed that creating a single destination – one that provides consistency as well as the most comprehensive, in-depth coverage for UConn fans, would result in increased visibility and popularity.”
In time for the 2012-13 season, SNY added more UConn content, paying an additional $4.55M over four years to lock in coverage of the women’s basketball program. That’s $4.55M for just the women’s program. It brought another facet of UConn athletics to the more than 14 million potential viewers.
Last night’s primetime lineup?
6:30 PM – UConn Women’s Pre-game
7:00 PM – UConn Women’s Basketball vs. Cincinnati
9:00 PM – UConn Women’s Post-game
9:30 PM – The Geno Auriemma Show
When the deal was signed to add women’s basketball to the programming already offered, Raab was ecstatic.
“It’s a really complete package,” Raab said. “I don’t know that there is another college program receiving this much attention.” Ironically, Raab was asked about the deal that the University of Oklahoma had signed with Fox Sports that brought 1,000 hours of sports programming to the local airwaves in the Sooner state. “That package doesn’t reach 14 million homes,” he responded. “We also own the worldwide rights to the UConn women and don’t have to black out programming, including games, to distributors out of market.” Ratings have only increased since the partnership expanded to include all three major programs at UConn. In 2014, one women’s basketball game alone, drew a 9.6 market share in the Hartford/New Haven DMA; the Huskies saw an 18% ratings increase on SNY that year. “We knew we would deliver UConn a broader national audience, but these substantial ratings gains across all of our UConn properties on a local level are another great development,” Raab added. “We are excited about the potential to grow the brand even more as we continue our partnership with the University.” What is even more impressive is the ratings increases have occurred since the Huskies moved from the Big East, to the perceived, lesser talented and less competitive American Athletic Conference. As we’ve moved into 2016, the UConn men’s hockey program has begun to receive exposure, with two live simulcasts appearing on SNY, in conjunction with the Hockey East television deal.
As assessments and comparisons among potential BIG XII expansion candidates continues, SNY is Exhibit A of why UConn is the most valuable option when looking at additions in conjunction with a Big 12 Network. If you think viewership is good when playing the likes of Tulsa, SMU and Tulane, imagine the possibilities and exposure in the northeast for Kansas, Texas and Oklahoma.

Before Tier 3 media rights became a thing of the past, UConn also stacked up with its P5 peers. UConn signed a Tier 3 media deal with IMG valued at $80M over 10 years, which, at the time, placed UConn in the top half of similar deal values. UConn also signed a Tier 3 media contract with SNY for women's basketball only, valued at $1.14M/yr. Combined, this put UConn's Tier 3 media rights well over $9M/yr which would be valued in the upper half of P5 member values. UConn also signed an apparel contract with Nike at around the same time as its IMG Tier 3 medial contract, and that contract was valued at $2.775M in 2014-15. This would put UConn at 27th, ahead of Cincinnati ($2.625M with Under Armour...which was signed more recently than UConn's deal). USF comes in at $1.67M with Under Armour; Houston at 500K with Nike; UCF, Memphis and BYU are not listed (but BYU likely has a comparable deal with Nike that UConn has).
Can you email John Delaney this too? Great stuff!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
613
Guests online
3,822
Total visitors
4,435

Forum statistics

Threads
157,001
Messages
4,076,350
Members
9,967
Latest member
UChuskman


Top Bottom