Exactly, even if you stay at the same school you need to apply to the graduate school. You don't necessarily get into a graduate program just because you were an under grad there.Here's the thing.. Graduates, aren't transfers.
When you finish your undergrad and went on to an MBA or professional school, did you say that you were transferring? Nope you graduated and moved on. You didn't worry about whether your new school would accept your credits, they didn't need to you already had your degree.
So the "transfer rules" are absolutely irrelevant to grads who have eligibility left.
And there in lies the reason why it will probably be restricted at some point by the NCAA going forward. They are all for the benefit of the athlete. Wait...What?Bilas was great as always. RJ Evans and Tyler Murphy did a great job articulating how it benefits the athletes.
LMFAO! Gimmie a frikking break! These coaches are full of it! I tell you what theyre afraid of. Theyre afraid that a team in there conference who isnt competing suddenly pulls in 2,3 or even 4 Grad players and get really good really fast. Just look at Uconn. We pulled in 2 guys a lot of people wanted and we went from a team not mentioned to possibly pre season top20 or even 15 and on the rise. This is a way to get really good really quick. Do you guys understand how loud the whining is going to get if we win 30 games and get to the FF4 or win it all?!!!![]()
Anyone else notice the tinge of irony that Trajan Langdon was a 5th year player in 1998/99? Begs the question if Coach K prevented him from "transferring" due to fairness. Remember, at that point, no one had left a K coached team before their 4 years were exhausted.
Ok, let's go ahead and force them to sit a year. But, first, if kids being real students is the goal then we should also change the rules on players leaving to play professionally. I say that any kid who leaves for any reason other than transferring should count against a team's total scholarships until the year he would have graduated. If a one and done leaves, the team loses that scholarship for another three years. If they leave after two years, you lose a scholarship for another two and if they leave after three, you lose it for one more year. This "on track to graduate" thing is BS to keep teams like puke and uk from rapidly dropping to zero available scholarships. them! If you take 4 or 5 one and dones for three consecutive years, you should have a total disaster year of only walk ons. Honestly, that would only be fair.
That is back burner stuff. Emmert would rather pick the low hanging fruit in an effort to give off the perception he is actually doing something value added. Preferred-Diety-forbid he make a tough decision that negatively impacts historically influential lords of the P-5 manner.The NCAA has bigger things to worry about than where kids who have received their degrees can continue to play basketball as they further their education. Pathetic stuff.
We are going to be talked about all year on this I guess because we have 2 players. The problem is this, we followed the rule so why should we have to be on the defensive about it like we did something wrong? Taking a one and done knowing they have no intention of getting a college degree? Now that's something coach K and Calipari might want to defend even though they are breaking no rule.
Click on the article through google search: https://www.google.com/search?q=Tra...le+That+Has+Helped+UConn+Stirs+Debate&tbm=nwsAny way to read this article without a Hartford Courant subscription?
11th overall pick!!! Is he the greatest 5th year transfer of all time? So Coach K is still bitter from 1999, and Cal is bitter from his most recent finals loss. Sounds like poor sports to me.
Anyone else notice the tinge of irony that Trajan Langdon was a 5th year player in 1998/99? Begs the question if Coach K prevented him from "transferring" due to fairness. Remember, at that point, no one had left a K coached team before their 4 years were exhausted.