I hear you. It’s complicated.
On one hand, there’s no way to justify the old system. Coaches, atheletic departments, and networks had all the power in what evolved into a multi billion dollar business, and the athletes had none. So on that basis, yes, yes, yes, for the ability to transfer and NIL.
But as the business model evolves more and more toward a professional sports league (free agency and big contracts) it gets away from the concept of a bunch of local kids playing for state U, gelling and doing something special. Something gained and something lost.
We seem to have absolutely hit the sweet spot this year between our own local recruits, and transfers so the inclination is to be all in for the new paradigm, but as the arms race escalates I’m not sure where we end up. Something gained (short term) and something ?