Transfer-pocalypse 2020 Update | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Transfer-pocalypse 2020 Update

Joined
Dec 14, 2017
Messages
411
Reaction Score
1,437
There are lots of threads on this, but to sum up, a good number of players that "portaled" (and some parents, and some that graduated during RE 2.0) have expressed their outright disdain for him and his methods very publicly on Twitter. The biggest complaint seemed to be that the development of Edsall's guys took precedence and Diaco's guys were mainly put out to pasture. Those not getting the playing time/attention they thought they deserved likely also would have voiced their displeasure in the locker room/around campus. Presumably, those guys are gone now and those left have bought into what RE 2.0 is preaching.

Those getting the playing time the past few years should now be developed enough so that on-field results tangibly improve. If not, then the argument that Edsall just replaced older FCS players for younger FCS players will start gaining traction.

Yes you are 100 percent on the money. Diaco players hated Edsall and the parents hated him too. It was a really bad atmosphere in the locker room and a lot of bad things were said behind Edsalls back.
The others are all on board and I feel a much better outcome this year..
 
Last edited:

UC1995

Back to Basics!
Joined
Jul 14, 2015
Messages
945
Reaction Score
3,886
Any one have quick access to how many Diaco guys are still here?
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
4,308
Reaction Score
7,449
Remember what he said after the 2018 season? Asked why he played all those freshmen instead of the upper classmen?
He said it would have been worse.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2013
Messages
1,630
Reaction Score
3,232
Remember what he said after the 2018 season? Asked why he played all those freshmen instead of the upper classmen?
He said it would have been worse.
I’m a little skeptical. I believe he did the same around 2000 and 01. Hopefully it pays off this year.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
8,688
Reaction Score
15,411
There are lots of threads on this, but to sum up, a good number of players that "portaled" (and some parents, and some that graduated during RE 2.0) have expressed their outright disdain for him and his methods very publicly on Twitter. The biggest complaint seemed to be that the development of Edsall's guys took precedence and Diaco's guys were mainly put out to pasture. Those not getting the playing time/attention they thought they deserved likely also would have voiced their displeasure in the locker room/around campus. Presumably, those guys are gone now and those left have bought into what RE 2.0 is preaching.

Those getting the playing time the past few years should now be developed enough so that on-field results tangibly improve. If not, then the argument that Edsall just replaced older FCS players for younger FCS players will start gaining traction.
It's actually an unfortunate part of the transition from one coaching regime to another. It's the philosophy and type of player moreso than the players themselves in my opinion. I hate to watch all that go down.

Got love for all the guys, but when change happens, feelings sometime get hurt... But, in the end, life goes on
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
4,308
Reaction Score
7,449
I’m a little skeptical. I believe he did the same around 2000 and 01. Hopefully it pays off this year.
Hope so too. Shouldn't be some surprise that there existed a rift within the program after hearing that. I wish them all the best going forward.
 

Online statistics

Members online
81
Guests online
2,405
Total visitors
2,486

Forum statistics

Threads
156,974
Messages
4,074,999
Members
9,965
Latest member
deltaop99


Top Bottom