Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="EricLA, post: 3670749, member: 26"] Saylor up to 30. It does indeed seem they are making their updates in real time. I know i said i wouldn't comment till they were done, but my comments are more related to "which ones are right"... There are some recruits who are #1, or top 5, or even top 10 according to the services we look at most - ESPN, Blue Star and Prospects Nation. Those are pretty easy - as in Fudd is #1 per everyone. But other players are all over the map. Blue Star seems to be really high on all the UCONN recruits. PN not as much, and ESPN HG is i mixed bag. Most of us, when we do a deep dive, will look at the composite rankings, meaning the average of the rankings by all the services. Sometimes we get reports of ASGR, another service who I don't think publicly publishes their rankings. At any rate, at least an average of 3-4 services gives us a good idea of how the kids are ranked coming in. A few of the biggest discrepancies i ever saw involved Kiah Stokes, Stef Dolson and Kelly Faris. [LIST] [*]Kiah - 42, 14, 6, 9 [*]Stef - 39, 24, 25, 12 [*]Kelly - 34, 26, 9, 7 [/LIST] Kiah averaged about 18. Stef about 25. Kelly about 19. I think in general, for what those kids meant to UCONN, Stef and Kelly definitely performed way above their rankings, and Kiah was definitely better, but not by as huge a margin as the other 2. I guess my point is as much as we scratch our heads at some of the numbers we see, the flip side is in a lot of ways the folks ranking for the services have a thankless task as most people will find many nits to pick with their numbers. But bottom line, taking the average should give us a decent idea of how good these kids are currently combined with how the evaluators view their potential. A very subjective science to be sure... [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,480

Messages: 4,397,779

Members: 10,213

Latest member: MurrDog