doggydaddy
Grampysorus Rex
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 6,008
- Reaction Score
- 8,970
It's not nice to call Icebear a name.Hysterical!! "The Undisputed, Number One, Self-Appointed Heysiddonder-in-Chief" of the forum gettin' testy!
It's not nice to call Icebear a name.Hysterical!! "The Undisputed, Number One, Self-Appointed Heysiddonder-in-Chief" of the forum gettin' testy!
huh? Davis has scored 14 more points than Scaife and taken 64 fewer shots. The comparison just gets worse if you take rebounds, steals, TOs into account. Davis's numbers are vastly better than Scaife'sScaife for RU has put up almost identical numbers as Nina Davis and think you have to add her in as well....
Sometimes you have to look beyond the numbers in this team game. RU has become a completely transformed and improved team with Scaife being the only change/difference from last years 16 win team esp offensively.huh? Davis has scored 14 more points than Scaife and taken 64 fewer shots. The comparison just gets worse if you take rebounds, steals, TOs into account. Davis's numbers are vastly better than Scaife's
Um... Davis is a forward. Scaife is a guard. I'm not sure what sport you follow, but of course a forward should have better rebounds than a guard.huh? Davis has scored 14 more points than Scaife and taken 64 fewer shots. The comparison just gets worse if you take rebounds, steals, TOs into account. Davis's numbers are vastly better than Scaife's
And the fact that CVS frowns upon any one player taking too many shots(esp fr)!Too let her play says a lot.Um... Davis is a forward. Scaife is a guard. I'm not sure what sport you follow, but of course a forward should have better rebounds than a guard.
Scaife - 13.3 PPG, 76.5 FG%, 1.3 steals, 3.0 APG, 3.0 RPG
Davis - 13.9 PPG, 65.7 FG%, 2.0 steals, 1.7 APG, 8.8 RPG
So as expected, forward Davis would have more rebounds, but guard Scaife would have more assists. It was their PPG that i was referring to in their stats, since that's the number that most often is compared from a production standpoint.
Last year Plum was trying to get KLS to go to Washington to play with her. Didn't work............but nice try.Lots of good frosh, but I see a glaring omission. Washington upset #3 Stanford today. The leading scorer for those Huskies is freshman Kelsey Plum, averaging 19.7 ppg. She is very, very good.
Numbers are numbers. Why do you think I don't think Chong's number are pedestrian?
You have this weird idea that I won't describe Chong in the same way as Reimer.
Again, you brought up Chong for no reason other than to try to show that I don't use an even hand in looking at a ND player vs a Uconn player.
Bull. [mod edit]
Have a pleasant day.So prove me wrong!
Numbers are numbers. Why do you think I don't think Chong's number are pedestrian?
You have this weird idea that I won't describe Chong in the same way as Reimer.
Again, you brought up Chong for no reason other than to try to show that I don't use an even hand in looking at a ND player vs a Uconn player.
Bull. [mod edit]
And a guard should have more steals except, oops, Scaife doesn't. More to the point I mistakenly assumed you meant something beyond PPG since that stat alone tells you very little about how good someone is (see M Simmons).Um... Davis is a forward. Scaife is a guard. I'm not sure what sport you follow, but of course a forward should have better rebounds than a guard.
Scaife - 13.3 PPG, 76.5 FG%, 1.3 steals, 3.0 APG, 3.0 RPG
Davis - 13.9 PPG, 65.7 FG%, 2.0 steals, 1.7 APG, 8.8 RPG
So as expected, forward Davis would have more rebounds, but guard Scaife would have more assists. It was their PPG that i was referring to in their stats, since that's the number that most often is compared from a production standpoint.
Well, I said Chong isn't top 5. Not sure why I have to use the same words I used to describe Reimer. To make you happy?I will have a pleasant day, I proved my point!
And a guard should have more steals except, oops, Scaife doesn't. More to the point I mistakenly assumed you meant something beyond PPG since that stat alone tells you very little about how good someone is (see M Simmons).
Scaife is the real deal. Seems you haven't seen her play, if you insist on arguing on the fact.
Against UConn 22 points on 10-17 shooting, 3 assists, 3 rebounds.
Against L'ville 25 points on 10-16 shooting, 4 assists, 3 rebounds.
So I would not even think to compare Tyler to M. Simmons. Totally two different types of players.
I was really bummed when Scaife did not choose Baylor. She is the real deal. She is leaps and bounds better than Simmons.
You got Ieshia Small, who we were also recruiting. Has she played this year or is she injured?I was really bummed when Scaife did not choose Baylor. She is the real deal. She is leaps and bounds better than Simmons.
I'm actually very curious to see her. I was careful not to pass judgment on her as her player. Just pointed out that her overall stats are not particularly impressive. Since she's a freshman I'm willing to believe that she's very talented and that her numbers will eventually reflect that. Right now overall they're not fantastic, although she evidently had great games against the two best teams in the conference, which counts for a lot. Again, my comment about her stats doesn't mean that she's not very talented, and she may well become an all American. My only point was that Nina Davis has vastly better stats, as she scores more points on way fewer shots and has much better secondary stats. That's just a fact. All that said, I suspect I'll be impressed by Scaife when I see her play given all the enthusiastic comments here on the BY.Scaife is the real deal. Seems you haven't seen her play, if you insist on arguing on the fact.
Against UConn 22 points on 10-17 shooting, 3 assists, 3 rebounds.
Against L'ville 25 points on 10-16 shooting, 4 assists, 3 rebounds.
So I would not even think to compare Tyler to M. Simmons. Totally two different types of players.
Baylor didn't even make her final 5. Which were Rutgers, LSU, Ohio State, Kentucky, & Tennessee. Don't know if Baylor were in her top 10 though.
But I can't tell you how happy I am that she chose Rutgers. I was worried at the time that she would choose either Tennessee, or LSU.
You got Ieshia Small, who we were also recruiting. Has she played this year or is she injured?
Sometimes you have to look beyond the numbers in this team game. RU has become a completely transformed and improved team with Scaife being the only change/difference from last years 16 win team esp offensively.
I think it's mean to suggest that Reimer, though impressive, isn't nearly as much so as some other freshman across the country who've excelled on a consistent level, against all levels of competitors.Chong must be very pedestrian also with her 5.9 ppg; 1.9a and 19.4 min/g.
Not what I have been reading on the boneyard of late.
I'm thinking that your shooting percentage numbers above must be from the foul line or these girls, particularly Scaife (as a guard) are unbelievable shooters. Who shoots at those percentages from the field????Um... Davis is a forward. Scaife is a guard. I'm not sure what sport you follow, but of course a forward should have better rebounds than a guard.
Scaife - 13.3 PPG, 76.5 FG%, 1.3 steals, 3.0 APG, 3.0 RPG
Davis - 13.9 PPG, 65.7 FG%, 2.0 steals, 1.7 APG, 8.8 RPG
So as expected, forward Davis would have more rebounds, but guard Scaife would have more assists. It was their PPG that i was referring to in their stats, since that's the number that most often is compared from a production standpoint.
I think you meant meant not mean.I think it's mean to suggest that Reimer, though impressive, isn't nearly as much so as some other freshman across the country who've excelled on a consistent level, against all levels of competitors.
Too tell ya the truth I know the AAC aint the OBE but after UConn/ND theres about 40/60 teams and a bunch of really bad teams due to the shallowness of WBB talent pool? Considering the youth of RU I expect B1G things next yr and going forward. Remember only a couple of yrs ago we were UConns real rival/peer but since Pip(I swore never to think of her again) jumped to the pro's something inexplicable happened.....RU became only an average team(heresy) until this year their showing signs of life again with the good news being were(RU) so young. As for next year UConn deserves better than the AAC has or will have to offer IMO. I hope someone steps up to challenge you guys until the B1G offers for competive reasons.I'm hoping RU and UConn until then will play yearly OOC games to keep the whole region focused on the 2 programs. I'm really not concerned though with the C7.You don't think the change from the Big East to the AAC has more to do with it than Scaife?