- Joined
- Jan 25, 2021
- Messages
- 1,317
- Reaction Score
- 4,737

This is the best I've felt about UConn in a month
Podcast Episode · Top Dogs: A UConn Basketball Podcast · 01/26/2023 · 27m

Let’s all drink the Kool-AidHaven't listened yet but you've got to be some kind of optimist to feel that way! Lol
Let's keep it to ourselves if something was figured out in 2nd half of X game please.He says that he thinks UConn figured out how to use AJ and run effective offense in the second half. He believes the Big East had us figured out but by using AJ early in the offense to hand the ball off, we forced the D to guard him. He may be right but it’s hard to say. That’s a small sample. We had a dynamic second half but shots were falling. Jordan played like a lottery pick. He doesn’t do that every game.
In the Big East there has always been a need to able to grind games out. High scoring or low scoring, you have to perform late in the second half. I’m not sure that problem has been solved at all.
Excellent insights. Let’s hope “AJ-to-first-handoff-position” is the chess move that will stifle the Big East into mid-March and beyond. The way Hawk is emerging (23 PPG on 52% shooting last 4 games), teams will be hard-pressed to counter.![]()
This is the best I've felt about UConn in a month
Podcast Episode · Top Dogs: A UConn Basketball Podcast · 01/26/2023 · 27mpodcasts.apple.com
He says that he thinks UConn figured out how to use AJ and run effective offense in the second half. He believes the Big East had us figured out but by using AJ early in the offense to hand the ball off, we forced the D to guard him. He may be right but it’s hard to say. That’s a small sample. We had a dynamic second half but shots were falling. Jordan played like a lottery pick. He doesn’t do that every game.
In the Big East there has always been a need to able to grind games out. High scoring or low scoring, you have to perform late in the second half. I’m not sure that problem has been solved at all.
The problem he (and many others) continue to ignore is that we had plenty of great looks in the first half that we missed badly, and that is a common thread in all other big games.It makes a lot of sense. He's saying that teams are just ignoring Andre and not defending him out to the 3 point line, staying in the paint instead which cuts off driving lanes for everyone else. If Andre is setting a screen, especially for Jordan, teams can't defend Andre that way or else Jordan will have open 3s all day long. So this forces Andre's defender up to the 3 point line, which opens up driving lanes. That's why Jordan and Newton were able to drive the ball so easily in the 2nd half.
I'm sure there will be other adjustments but it makes a lot of sense why we were able to get to the rack after listening. Hopefully he's right and this opens up our offense moving forward.
I have not watched the video yet or read this entire thread so forgive me if what I am about to write has already been stated. When teams are not playing certain players out on the perimeter (standing in middle of paint or under basket), I have always said use them as off the ball and on the ball screener because you are basically playing 2 on 1. Voskuhl could occasionally hit the 12 footer and Okafor could shoot from 15 ft and closer, but even if they couldn't shoot outside worth a damn, they were very good at setting screens and picks and rim running.It makes a lot of sense. He's saying that teams are just ignoring Andre and not defending him out to the 3 point line, staying in the paint instead which cuts off driving lanes for everyone else. If Andre is setting a screen, especially for Jordan, teams can't defend Andre that way or else Jordan will have open 3s all day long. So this forces Andre's defender up to the 3 point line, which opens up driving lanes. That's why Jordan and Newton were able to drive the ball so easily in the 2nd half.
I'm sure there will be other adjustments but it makes a lot of sense why we were able to get to the rack after listening. Hopefully he's right and this opens up our offense moving forward.
Correct, IMO. The Villanova game bothered me a bunch. Even though UConn won, they only shot 9-30 (30%) at 3 pointers and most of these shots, let's say at least 23 if not more of them (going off memory), were wide open. That's not good enough considering how wide open they were. I think opposing teams saw that and basically said "we can live with this and it's worth it to collapse on Sanogo and clog the paint, they won't punish us from 3s too bad".The problem he (and many others) continue to ignore is that we had plenty of great looks in the first half that we missed badly, and that is a common thread in all other big games.
Despite adjustments by other teams on Jackson & Sanogo, this team and every Hurley team continues to miss open 3s and easy layups in big games and in crunch time.
If UConn is “fixed” it has nothing to do with a small Xs and Os tweak and more with what was said to get these guys playing like they aren’t deathly afraid of losing.
The problem he (and many others) continue to ignore is that we had plenty of great looks in the first half that we missed badly, and that is a common thread in all other big games.
Despite adjustments by other teams on Jackson & Sanogo, this team and every Hurley team continues to miss open 3s and easy layups in big games and in crunch time.
If UConn is “fixed” it has nothing to do with a small Xs and Os tweak and more with what was said to get these guys playing like they aren’t deathly afraid of losing.
Hurley has said as much. I think it's worse early in each half, which is much too scripted. Hurley has a plan, like "post up Andre" and they keep trying that whether it's there or not. He needs to give them some focus areas, with multiple options every possession, so they guys can take what's there.I think this team focuses too much on executing each play to completion and not enough on taking what the defense is giving you. Went back and re-watched the X game since I was there in person (pain), and they had an in the huddle clip where Hurley was telling Newton they’re giving him the driving lanes - finally they listened.
The offenses Hurley puts together are predicated on multiple ball screens, sometimes simultaneous ball screens, and it doesn’t seem like the guys are reacting in real time to what the defense is doing. It’s been obvious for a few games that teams are pressuring the ball and 3pt line against us because we haven’t been driving to the hoop. In some ways I hope that Hurley opens up the possessions a bit more to allowing guys to go to the rim at any time rather than executing each play to perfection. If we start getting teams on their heals the plays we do execute to completion should work even better. Time will tell.
Hurley has said as much. I think it's worse early in each half, which is much too scripted. Hurley has a plan, like "post up Andre" and they keep trying that whether it's there or not. He needs to give them some focus areas, with multiple options every possession, so they guys can take what's there.
But the biggest issue remains on the defensive end. Something is really wrong there and it's not solved by "play Clingan". The problem is on the perimeter.