- Joined
- Mar 21, 2021
- Messages
- 2,954
- Reaction Score
- 13,946
If they include ODU's success in AIAW then they should include Immaculta/Delta State.It says of all time, not modern or recent times.
Did you really just post a Big Game Boomer ranking and ask if it was valid? You must not be familiar with BGB. Otherwise that question wouldn't have even been asked. He is one of the biggest trolls on Twitter/IG.
I don't do the twitter thing to the point where I know everyone. And even a broken clock is right twice a day. List isn't outlandish and the decision is your own, hence the question. So what do you think?Did you really just post a Big Game Boomer ranking and ask if it was valid? You must not be familiar with BGB. Otherwise that question wouldn't have even been asked. He is one of the biggest trolls on Twitter/IG.
What no points for Conference Championships like regular season or Conference Tournament? I mean, it's not like you're going to do the research or caculations.....Not gonna do it but it would be interesting to give a numeric value to these levels of performance:
6 points per championship
5 points per runnerup
4 points per final 4
3 points per Elite 8
2 points per Sweet 16
1 point per 2d round
.5 point per tourney apoearance.
Total up the points per program an voila. Rank’em. I’m too lazy.
No. I’m not going to do the research and calculations. I have frequently admitted my laziness. I did quickly run through 10 UNC and 11 Scar. Under my proposed point system, UNC does deserve the higher ranking due to many more tournament appearancesWhat no points for Conference Championships like regular season or Conference Tournament? I mean, it's not like you're going to do the research or caculations.....
I do really like your points given format, visitingcock, with an amendment to give a point or so for a conference championship. Surely those titles matter. It isn't always about how many national titles one has, and that coming from a UConn fan. Those teams often are better than teams which somehow make the tournament and happen to win a first-round game.No. I’m not going to do the research and calculations. I have frequently admitted my laziness. I did quickly run through 10 UNC and 11 Scar. Under my proposed point system, UNC does deserve the higher ranking due to many more tournament appearances
Do conference championships even matter when discussing greatest teams of all time? I don’t think so. A big fish in a small pond isn’t necessarily a big fish in the ocean .
Do the pointy system I proposed for each of those teams. See if your arguments for various teams hold water. I’m too lazyLet me qualify that I am not wearing my @triaddukefan glasses on this BUT I don't know how NC or Texas is ranked ahead of SC at all. SC has more championships, more final fours and a negatable difference in Tournament appearances. Other than a 2 year period of 1986 & 1987 I don't think Texas was viewed as THE PROGRAM where as SC is.
Winning a title does have some credence and puts a team over those without any in most cases. NC has made 26 NCAAT so that is impressive. Texas has 33 appearances so that warrants a top 12. Now compare to Texas A&M has they do have the 1 title, they also only qualified for 1 Final Four and 17 NCAATs. That should not put them ahead of other teams with more Final Fours and more Tournament appearances like LSU, Georgia, Louisville or tOSU. Add in an interesting debate for Oklahoma and Virginia who each made 3 Final Fours and they were neglected and are better programs than WKU or JMU.
Maybe those "Twitters" should have consulted the BY first....
Could be the number of losing seasons in the programs' histories are factored in. Texas has had 4 in like 40 seasons. South Carolina had like 10 prior to Staley's arrival.Let me qualify that I am not wearing my @triaddukefan glasses on this BUT I don't know how NC or Texas is ranked ahead of SC at all. SC has more championships, more final fours and a negatable difference in Tournament appearances. Other than a 2 year period of 1986 & 1987 I don't think Texas was viewed as THE PROGRAM where as SC is.