Top 2021 WNBA Draft Prospects | The Boneyard

Top 2021 WNBA Draft Prospects

bballnut90

LV Adherent. Topic Crafter
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
7,058
Reaction Score
30,824
There's a lot up in the air right now, but assuming the 2020 WNBA Draft/season happens, here are some of the top prospects IMO:

1. Rennia Davis, Tennessee-might be one of the top picks in the draft. Fits the prototype for a solid WNBA wing. Deep range, good off the bounce and a solid rebounder at 6-2.

2. Dana Evans, Louisville-strong scoring PG, has consistently improved each year at Louisville. On the small side but could make a solid guard in the pros.

3. Didi Richards, Baylor-likely the best glue player in America. Outstanding passer, rebounder and likely named the national DPOY if the award is issued this year. Scoring ability needs to improve but the rest of her game is solid.

4. Michaela Onyenwere, UCLA-probably the most polished kid in the draft, problem is she's only 5-11 and her style of play is more of a PF than a wing. Needs to develop better wing skills to be able to stick in the pros.

5. Kiana Williams, Stanford-strong playmaking PG with good range on her shot. Very similar style of play to Crystal Dangerfield, has a few inches on her.

6. Destiny Slocum, Oregon State-good size/skill, solid passer and a great shooter and playmaker. Has been somewhat underwhelming since her standout freshman season though, this upcoming year will be a big chance for her to make her mark as OSU's likely go to.

7. Aari McDonald, Arizona-if she doesn't declare this year, McDonald should have better draft stock in 2021. A bit undersized, but a chance to improve her perimeter shot and her A/TO ratio.

8. Unique Thompson, Auburn-good scorer and rebounder at 6-3.

9. DiJonai Carrington, Stanford/??-standout performer at Stanford in 2018-19, has the makings of being a strong wing in the pros.

10. Lindsey Pulliam, Northwestern-strong guard with a scoring mentality. Needs to improve efficiency.

11. Ali Patberg, Indiana-6th year senior, good scorer and distributor.

12. Chelsea Dungee, Arkansas-strong scoring wing, regressed a bit as a junior.

Other noteworthy eligible players:
1. Evina Westbrook, Connecticut-with a big year she could easily be a top 3-4 pick in this class. Big guard with well rounded skills.

2. Chasity Patterson, Kentucky-a bit on the small size, but showed good skill at Kentucky this year.

3. Sidney Cooks, Mississippi State-face up 4 with good range on her shot. Stock could skyrocket with a big year at Mississippi State.

4. Charli Collier, Texas-will be eligible based on birth year. Talented 6-5 player with range out to 3.



Overall this draft looks incredibly weak. If Walker stayed, she likely would've been the #1 or #2 pick in this class. Carter if she stays will be a lock for #1 unless someone has a huge season. The 2022 and 2023 classes that should be deeper and more talented, especially 2023.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2019
Messages
530
Reaction Score
1,078
There's a lot up in the air right now, but assuming the 2020 WNBA Draft/season happens, here are some of the top prospects IMO:

1. Rennia Davis, Tennessee-might be one of the top picks in the draft. Fits the prototype for a solid WNBA wing. Deep range, good off the bounce and a solid rebounder at 6-2.

2. Dana Evans, Louisville-strong scoring PG, has consistently improved each year at Louisville. On the small side but could make a solid guard in the pros.

3. Didi Richards, Baylor-likely the best glue player in America. Outstanding passer, rebounder and likely named the national DPOY if the award is issued this year. Scoring ability needs to improve but the rest of her game is solid.

4. Michaela Onyenwere, UCLA-probably the most polished kid in the draft, problem is she's only 5-11 and her style of play is more of a PF than a wing. Needs to develop better wing skills to be able to stick in the pros.

5. Kiana Williams, Stanford-strong playmaking PG with good range on her shot. Very similar style of play to Crystal Dangerfield, has a few inches on her.

6. Destiny Slocum, Oregon State-good size/skill, solid passer and a great shooter and playmaker. Has been somewhat underwhelming since her standout freshman season though, this upcoming year will be a big chance for her to make her mark as OSU's likely go to.

7. Aari McDonald, Arizona-if she doesn't declare this year, McDonald should have better draft stock in 2021. A bit undersized, but a chance to improve her perimeter shot and her A/TO ratio.

8. Unique Thompson, Auburn-good scorer and rebounder at 6-3.

9. DiJonai Carrington, Stanford/??-standout performer at Stanford in 2018-19, has the makings of being a strong wing in the pros.

10. Lindsey Pulliam, Northwestern-strong guard with a scoring mentality. Needs to improve efficiency.

11. Ali Patberg, Indiana-6th year senior, good scorer and distributor.

12. Chelsea Dungee, Arkansas-strong scoring wing, regressed a bit as a junior.

Other noteworthy eligible players:
1. Evina Westbrook, Connecticut-with a big year she could easily be a top 3-4 pick in this class. Big guard with well rounded skills.

2. Chasity Patterson, Kentucky-a bit on the small size, but showed good skill at Kentucky this year.

3. Sidney Cooks, Mississippi State-face up 4 with good range on her shot. Stock could skyrocket with a big year at Mississippi State.

4. Charli Collier, Texas-will be eligible based on birth year. Talented 6-5 player with range out to 3.



Overall this draft looks incredibly weak. If Walker stayed, she likely would've been the #1 or #2 pick in this class. Carter if she stays will be a lock for #1 unless someone has a huge season. The 2022 and 2023 classes that should be deeper and more talented, especially 2023.
Some are speculating that Slocum may declare as an early entry next month, but the uncertainty of the WNBA season may keep her in college for her final year of eligibility.

Slocum has averaged 15 points and 5 assists per game during her two seasons at OSU. In the OSU slow-it-down offensive system, shots are spread out a lot and Slocum will have to shoot more frequently to put up better numbers and enhance her draft status. She is capable of doing so.

Slocum is listed at 5'7", but is physically very strong and typically has a strength advantage against her defender at the college level. At OSU, Scott Rueck has reined her in and limited her minutes during her two years there. Lots of Beavers fans have wondered why she has sat during important minutes of games during her two seasons in Corvallis.
 
Last edited:

bballnut90

LV Adherent. Topic Crafter
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
7,058
Reaction Score
30,824
What about Natasha Mack?
What about Aleah Goodman?
What about Destinee Walker?
What about Arella Guirantes?
What about Vivian Gray?

Dont see Goodman or Walker making it as pros. Havent seen enough of the other 3. Gray's percentages are awful though. Mack and Guirantes have good numbers.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2019
Messages
530
Reaction Score
1,078
Pulliam: 38.6% FG
V. Gray: 31.5% FG
Wow. Knew about Pulliam being less than 40%. Had no idea that Gray was so close to 30%. So, I took a look.

The Oklahoma State stats page showed Gray shot 36.3% this season, lowlighted by 3/19 and 9/30 performances. I wonder if @Plebe was looking at Gray's 3FG%. A 36.3% FG% is poor enough for a volume shooter.
 
Last edited:

bballnut90

LV Adherent. Topic Crafter
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
7,058
Reaction Score
30,824
Do you really see Patberg as a WNBA player?



That didn’t stop you from considering Pulliam. Both are AP All American Honorable Mentions.



Definitely overlooked them.

Just trying to start conversation here....why dont you post a mock first round if you're not a fan of my list?
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,393
Reaction Score
69,717
Wow. Knew about Pulliam being less than 40%. Had no idea that Gray was so close to 30%. So, I took a look.

The Oklahoma State stats page showed Gray shot 36.3% this season, lowlighted by 3/19 and 9/30 performances. I wonder if @Plebe was looking at Gray's 3FG%. A 36.3% FG% is poor enough for a volume shooter.
Ha I thought that looked too low! Thanks for the much needed correction :)
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Messages
9,378
Reaction Score
10,618
Just trying to start conversation here....why dont you post a mock first round if you're not a fan of my list?

I didn’t say I wasn’t a fan of your list. Just trying to continue the conversation by mentioning some names you seemed to have overlooked.

My focus is on 2020.
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2014
Messages
218
Reaction Score
868
Wow. Knew about Pulliam being less than 40%. Had no idea that Gray was so close to 30%. So, I took a look.

The Oklahoma State stats page showed Gray shot 36.3% this season, lowlighted by 3/19 and 9/30 performances. I wonder if @Plebe was looking at Gray's 3FG%. A 36.3% FG% is poor enough for a volume shooter.

Gray really plays beautiful basketball. She played on a team that lacked scorers so she was often forced into taking a lot of shots, including bad shots as the shot clock wore down. She also wore down in games. She played very heavy minutes while being the focus of other teams' defense. Texas, for example, could alternate Celeste Taylor and Jada Underwood, both very good defenders, among others. Teams could afford to double team Gray because everyone knew Ok St wanted Gray to take the shot and other players could not make the opponent pay. I think Gray might need to get physically stronger to deal with the WNBA.
 

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
Would Rhyne Howard be eligible?
No she would not be eligible. Fiba list her DOB as: 29 Apr 2000.
 
Joined
Feb 27, 2017
Messages
726
Reaction Score
2,585
There's a lot up in the air right now, but assuming the 2020 WNBA Draft/season happens, here are some of the top prospects IMO:

1. Rennia Davis, Tennessee-might be one of the top picks in the draft. Fits the prototype for a solid WNBA wing. Deep range, good off the bounce and a solid rebounder at 6-2.

2. Dana Evans, Louisville-strong scoring PG, has consistently improved each year at Louisville. On the small side but could make a solid guard in the pros.

3. Didi Richards, Baylor-likely the best glue player in America. Outstanding passer, rebounder and likely named the national DPOY if the award is issued this year. Scoring ability needs to improve but the rest of her game is solid.

4. Michaela Onyenwere, UCLA-probably the most polished kid in the draft, problem is she's only 5-11 and her style of play is more of a PF than a wing. Needs to develop better wing skills to be able to stick in the pros.

5. Kiana Williams, Stanford-strong playmaking PG with good range on her shot. Very similar style of play to Crystal Dangerfield, has a few inches on her.

6. Destiny Slocum, Oregon State-good size/skill, solid passer and a great shooter and playmaker. Has been somewhat underwhelming since her standout freshman season though, this upcoming year will be a big chance for her to make her mark as OSU's likely go to.

7. Aari McDonald, Arizona-if she doesn't declare this year, McDonald should have better draft stock in 2021. A bit undersized, but a chance to improve her perimeter shot and her A/TO ratio.

8. Unique Thompson, Auburn-good scorer and rebounder at 6-3.

9. DiJonai Carrington, Stanford/??-standout performer at Stanford in 2018-19, has the makings of being a strong wing in the pros.

10. Lindsey Pulliam, Northwestern-strong guard with a scoring mentality. Needs to improve efficiency.

11. Ali Patberg, Indiana-6th year senior, good scorer and distributor.

12. Chelsea Dungee, Arkansas-strong scoring wing, regressed a bit as a junior.

Other noteworthy eligible players:
1. Evina Westbrook, Connecticut-with a big year she could easily be a top 3-4 pick in this class. Big guard with well rounded skills.

2. Chasity Patterson, Kentucky-a bit on the small size, but showed good skill at Kentucky this year.

3. Sidney Cooks, Mississippi State-face up 4 with good range on her shot. Stock could skyrocket with a big year at Mississippi State.

4. Charli Collier, Texas-will be eligible based on birth year. Talented 6-5 player with range out to 3.



Overall this draft looks incredibly weak. If Walker stayed, she likely would've been the #1 or #2 pick in this class. Carter if she stays will be a lock for #1 unless someone has a huge season. The 2022 and 2023 classes that should be deeper and more talented, especially 2023.

Now you are going to have to revise it :p

 

Online statistics

Members online
640
Guests online
3,405
Total visitors
4,045

Forum statistics

Threads
157,003
Messages
4,076,391
Members
9,967
Latest member
UChuskman


Top Bottom