- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 6,370
- Reaction Score
- 16,540
Here's your Case Study.
One has 8 wins and his Team looks fabulous. One has 4 wins and he has a decent chance to get to a bowl. And the other has One win and will have a tough time getting to 2.
a priori ... Could you see this coming? And how does this relate to Diaco? First, look at those 3 resumes. I really really don't think you are getting most high flying guys (successes at Ohio State (though mostly his career was climbing colleges in Texas (Texas Lutheran, Texas, Texas State, Rice, Iowa State) or at Baylor (where he followed Briles from Stephenville HS to Houston) or at Clemson (and before that at Tulsa and 16 illustrious years in Texas HC in HS including Stephenville) to come to New England. We simply have a different candidate slate than guys that have been through Texas and largely southern experience/recruiting.
What Tom Herman is doing is not the norm; look over the landscape, there is not a lot of first year HC that splash like this. As we look at Tulsa and SMU, it is various obvious that Houston (he was hired the second week of Dec) had plenty of this talent in the school when he arrived. He might have a good Program/Schemes/Systems; but, I can't say that he has far better Assistants than Montgomery or Morris. I looked at their relative staff resumes & this is all feeling similar. Houston has solid gameday performance and he put together a far better early system with the level of talent.
Can you absolutely tell that Chad Morris today is not as good a HC as Hermann? Sure. But, Morris has done some really great things and you wouldn't bet against him. Diaco - in his second year - I bet is equaled by some of the bonehead stuff that the others have done. The AAC (with Ruhle. Fuente. as well) is exciting, I think, because of the caliber of coaches that are energizing these programs.
One has 8 wins and his Team looks fabulous. One has 4 wins and he has a decent chance to get to a bowl. And the other has One win and will have a tough time getting to 2.
a priori ... Could you see this coming? And how does this relate to Diaco? First, look at those 3 resumes. I really really don't think you are getting most high flying guys (successes at Ohio State (though mostly his career was climbing colleges in Texas (Texas Lutheran, Texas, Texas State, Rice, Iowa State) or at Baylor (where he followed Briles from Stephenville HS to Houston) or at Clemson (and before that at Tulsa and 16 illustrious years in Texas HC in HS including Stephenville) to come to New England. We simply have a different candidate slate than guys that have been through Texas and largely southern experience/recruiting.
What Tom Herman is doing is not the norm; look over the landscape, there is not a lot of first year HC that splash like this. As we look at Tulsa and SMU, it is various obvious that Houston (he was hired the second week of Dec) had plenty of this talent in the school when he arrived. He might have a good Program/Schemes/Systems; but, I can't say that he has far better Assistants than Montgomery or Morris. I looked at their relative staff resumes & this is all feeling similar. Houston has solid gameday performance and he put together a far better early system with the level of talent.
Can you absolutely tell that Chad Morris today is not as good a HC as Hermann? Sure. But, Morris has done some really great things and you wouldn't bet against him. Diaco - in his second year - I bet is equaled by some of the bonehead stuff that the others have done. The AAC (with Ruhle. Fuente. as well) is exciting, I think, because of the caliber of coaches that are energizing these programs.