jbdphi
Aussie Aussie Aussie!
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,524
- Reaction Score
- 3,122
2010: Didn't beat anyone remotely good.
2009: Notre Dame sucked, went 6-6. South Carolina sucked, went 7-6.
So who qualifies as good, let alone remotely good? If so many teams suck, including UConn in your opinion, then I have to assume that you only include the Top 25 count as good and maybe "also receiving votes" is remotely good? Is that right?
Because if a winning record means your team "sucks" then I guess we're using different definitions.