To foul or not to foul? | The Boneyard

To foul or not to foul?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
604
Reaction Score
166
Just watched the 99 title game on VHS (original copy) at my parents house. After seeing Langdon dribble it off his legs I say Jim Calhoun had it right and To Not Foul! Go
Huskies!!!
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,089
Reaction Score
19,229
Just watched the 99 title game on VHS (original copy) at my parents house. After seeing Langdon dribble it off his legs I say Jim Calhoun had it right and To Not Foul! Go
Huskies!!!

In that case, yes, he was right. Langdon never got into a position where he could shoot anything other than a prayer. Fouling would have just given them a chance that they never had at all.

I'd have preferred a foul to letting Redick shoot a three in 2004, but it worked out. Redick was unclutch, and it was still maybe a smidgen too early to foul (6 seconds). We commonly think about the McNamara 3, but that was way too early to foul - a foul would have been with 9 or so seconds left.

One time we didn't and probably should have was Louisville in the 2011 title game. They got a decent look with only a couple of seconds to work with.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
357
Guests online
2,936
Total visitors
3,293

Forum statistics

Threads
160,133
Messages
4,219,550
Members
10,082
Latest member
unlikejo
.
Top Bottom