Thoughts/Analysis on the ACC heading into 2025-26 | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Thoughts/Analysis on the ACC heading into 2025-26

Top 25 scorers (ppg) in ACC heading in to this season. Obviously excludes freshmen - redshirts use previous season's numbers.

1)H. Hidalgo Jr. 23.8 ND
2)R. Rose Gr. 22.3 Clem*(transfer from Wofford)
3)K. Pierre Jr. 20.4 NC St.*(transfer from Vandy)
4)K. Johnson Jr. 17.9 VA
5)G. Raviv So. 17.9 Mia*(transfer from Quinnipiac)
6)L. Ziegler Sr. 17.5 Lou*(transfer from St. Joseph's)
7)L. Phelia Sr. 16.8 Syr*(transfer from Texas)
8)T. Skinner Gr. 16.8 SMU*(transfer from Ariz. St.)
9)C. Alben Sr. 16.6 GT*(transfer from Charleston So.)
10)N. Agara Jr. 15.8 Stan
11)A. Brown Sr. 15.3 SMU*(transfer fromUT Martin)
12)A. Jones Sr. 15.2 Pitt*(transfer from Coppin St.)
13)P. Davis Jr. 15.0 FSU*(transfer from New Mexico JC)
13)J. Shavers Sr. 14.9 FSU*(transfer from TT)
14)A. Kimpson Jr. 14.5 Mia*(transfer from UNLV)
15)T. J-Matthew Sr. 14.5 Clem*(transfer from DePaul)
16)Z. Brooks Jr. 14.2 NC St.
17)R. S. Kyle Gr. 14.1 Mia*(transfer from Fl)
18)C. Wenzel rsJr. 14.0 VT
19)L. Twidale Jr. 13.2 Cal
20)T. Fournier So. 13.2 Duke
21)T. Roberts So. 12.8 Lou
22)C. Baker Jr. 12.6 VT
23)M. Lee Sr. 12.6 Clem*(transfer from Marist)
24)A. Jackson Sr. 12.4 Duke
25)I. Moore Gr. 12.4 ND*(transfer from Vandy)

Top-25 by school: Clem and Mia(3), ND/NC St./Lou/SMU/FSU/VT/Duke all with (2), VA/Syr/GT/Stan/Pitt/Cal (1) and NC/BC/WF with (0).

All other double-digit scorers: Miami(3),GT and SMU(2),Syracuse/VT/Pitt/Clemson/Louisville/FSU/VA/Stanford (1each)

A few observations:

15 of the Top 25 are transfers and 10 are returnees of which only 3 of the Top 10.

13 are seniors or graduates, 9 are juniors, and 3 are sophomores of which only 3 of the Top 10 are juniors and only 1 is a sophomore. This could be an indicator of things to come after this season.

Only 7 of the 15 transfers are from P4/P5 schools

Double digit scorers by School: Miami(6), Clemson and SMU(4), VT/GT/Lou/FSU(3), ND/NC ST/VA/SYR/Stan/Pitt/Duke(2), and Cal(1). NC/BC/WF have no returning or incoming double-digit scorers.
 
Interesting to think about. Obviously not all point averages are created equally. Someone at ND playing alongside Miles, Citron and HH last year was not going to average double figures as there aren’t enough shots to go around. Someone at WF or Pitt could have inflated stats because someone has to score. And players coming from G5 or lower programs are going against lower competition and hard to say how that translates.

A team like Duke plays a lot of players. A team like State narrows down the rotation quite a bit allowing for more shots per player in theory.

interesting about UNCCH having 0. They lost Utsby but she wasn’t a shot hunter. Where does the scoring come from this year ?

Zoe is on the list for State and I fully expect her numbers to sky rocket without Rivers, James and Hayes around this year. She was often the 3rd option on the court last year.
 
interesting about UNCCH having 0. They lost Utsby but she wasn’t a shot hunter. Where does the scoring come from this year ?
Good question. Utsby (10.9ppg) was their leading scorer, followed by Gakdeng(10.8ppg), Donarski(10.7ppg), all gone. Very even distribution as you mentioned about some others. Kelly at (9.6ppg) would be the logical choice - along with Nivar(8.3ppg) and Grant(7.3ppg). They've also added Harris from Louisville(8.6ppg) and Aarnisalo via UCLA/Finland(5.1ppg) so I would expect to see more of the same this year as last although they will need to see Thomas and/or Toomey step up to truly fill in the gap left by Gakdeng. There are also some highly ranked incoming freshmen who could have an impact.
 
All right Miami is up next.

Tricia Cullop's first season at the P4 level and in the ACC conference did not go so well. They began the pre-season ranked approximately #35 and finished the season unranked. Season one for Cullop left Miami with a record of 14-15 overall(.483) and a dismal 4-14 in the conference(.222). In her defense the unexpected retirement of Meier and the lateness of her hire left many of the better players in the portal already taken. Worse was the ensuing departure of so many very good players (Latson, Spearman, Oldacre, Day-Wilson,Williams,Dwyer) who all went on to be key contributors on other(mostly highly ranked) teams. It was definitely a disappointing season but the fact that they were even considered to be around #35 pre-season ranking tells you what the "experts" thought of both Cullop as a coach and the team she ultimately assembled. Their final two games of the season were lopsided losses on the west coast to Stanford and Cal. Miami absolutely underachieved and both the coaching staff and the players are partially responsible. If not for the return of the Cavinder twins a bad season would have been a total disaster. Can Cullop turn things around in year two ? Although nothing is certain I would say emphatically yes!

What was lost: All starting 5 plus 2 key contributors along with 3 other bench players : total of 10 players. That didn't leave very much. Gone to graduation are starting post players C.Williams (6'3" 11.7ppg) and N.Marshall (6'5" 7.7ppg). Haley Cavinder (their leading scorer18.2ppg and assist leader) along with sister Hanna (6.9ppg) and 2nd in assists, J.Roberts one of the few who stayed on after the coaching change (10.0ppg) and 6th "man" D.Rogers (7.0ppg). L.Hylton (2.6ppg) was a key contributor off the bench but has moved on to join TX A&M. Also hitting the portal were L.Harmon(2.8ppg) to UCF, A.Almon (1.3ppg) to Syracuse, and D.Abies(2.3ppg) to St. John's. In total they lost 6 experienced guards and 4 post players.

What remains: Returning are only 2 players : backup pg A.Adams (So. 5'6" G 3.7ppg) and S.Pelish(rs Fr. 6'0" G) who did not play last year due to an injury - more on that later.

Incoming transfers: 7 total players of which I expect 5 will be starters and another the 6th player/1st player off the bench. First up is Ra Shaya Kyle from Florida (Gr. 6'6" C 14.1ppg) and Jessica Peterson from SMU (Gr. 6'2" P 10.3ppg). Also coming in are Mya Kone (rs Jr. 6'2" F/W 11.4ppg) from FIU, V.Blasigh (Jr. 5'9" G 10.4ppg) from USF, A.Kimpson (Jr. 5'8" G 14.5ppg) from UNLV, G.Raviv (So. 5'9" G 17.9ppg) from Quinnipiac/Israel, and finally C.Kpetikou (rs So. 6'3" C 3.4ppg) via Wash.St./Niger.

Incoming freshmen: 5 players : #36 C.Williams (they lost a C.Williams to grduation and got one back lol) (5'11" G), #54 D.Osho (6'1" F), #80 N.Wetzel (6'3" F), #91 M.Tippner (5'10" G), and UR S.Okolo (6'1" F).


So what went wrong last year and why do I think they can turn it around ? As for last year Miami's ACC record stood at 1-2 after 3 games (including a decent showing against NC) but that's where the problems began. Miami hosted VT and was up double digits halfway through the 4th quarter - and blew the game, losing by 4. That was a game they should have won especially when you consider the starting 5 was made up of veterans: 4 grad-students and a senior (along with 6th player also being a grad student). VT and Miami's seasons diverged after this game - VT becoming competetive and nearly making the tournament and Miami going the opposite direction. What followed were 6 games of which 5 were winnable. They lost by 5 at Syracuse, by 4 at home to BC, by 22 at FSU(expected loss), by 3 at Clemson, won by 7 over SMU, and won by 3 over VA. Miami SHOULD have been 7-3 at this point but instead was 3-7. They only won 1 more game the rest of the season - a measly 2 point win at home over hapless WF. For whatever reasons Miami just didn't seem to "jell" as a team all that well. Is that the coaches fault or the players? I think it was some of both but mostly it was just circumstances. And a learning curve that both had trouble overcoming.

So why do I think they can turn it around in one season? Many reasons. Number one is coaching. Cullop admitted she had adjutments to make after her first season. She recognized the importance of having over-achieving starters from lesser teams over having back up players from top teams when it comes to mining the portal for talent. It also helps to get mostly players for more than one season rather than the one-and-done players because they need to REALLY know your system in order to excell in it. Cullop also recognized Miami needed more Size, Physicality, and Speed. Cullop was able to round up a Top 15 portal class but more importantly landed what could be a really solid starting 5 + 1 as well as what I think may be THE best front court in the ACC this year. The starting tandem of R.S. Kyle and J.Peterson is scary. Of the players having dbl-dbls last year Miami has both #3 and #4 in the ACC - Kyle with 16 and Peterson with 14. Only Ziegler(Louisville transfer from St. Joseph's)with 20 and Pierre(NC St. transfer from Vandy) with 17 have more. Just for comparison Betts/UCLA (19), Prince/TCU(16), Strack/KY(15) and Beers/OK(15). Only UCONN is close with S.Williams(14) and Strong(13) as a duo and KY with Strack(15) and Key(12). In the ACC the only teams that might be able to challenge them would be NC St (with Trygger/Pierre) and FSU (Davis/Kubek).
Cullop also addresssed the backcourt with G.Raviv (MAAC POTY and ROTY), A.Kimpson (Mt.West Conf. former FOTY), V.Blasigh (AAC former FOTY), and M.Kone(former 6th POTY). All six players are double digit scorers.

Cullop's system also needs depth in order for it to be successful. That's where recruiting last year's #10 class comes in. So I envision something along the following: Starting Center Kyle (6'6") backed up by Kpetikou(6'3") and freshman Wetzel (6'3"), Starting Forward (6'2" Peterson) backed up by Kone (6'2") and freshman Osho(6'1"), Starting Guard Raviv(5'9") backed up by freshman Williams (5'11") and freshman Tippner (5'10"), Starting Guard Basleigh (5'9") backed up by rs freshman Pelish (6'0") and freshman Okolo (6'1"), Starting Guard Kimpson (5'8") backed up by so. Adams (5'6"). Adams was ranked #41 in the 2024 class. There is footage out there of Okolo dunking the ball both one-handed and two-handed and nearly dunking on an alley-oop play. She has an insane vertical for 6'1" ! Wetzel is said to be Miami's best pure 3-point shooter and at 6'3" could stretch the floor. And now we come to rs freshman Pelish. For those that read every crazy set of stats I put out there she is the "mystery girl" from New York's all-time scorers list. She attended the same h.s. as Maddy Siegrist and had the same coach years apart. She broke most of Siegrist's records and also took her team to the state title which Siegrist did not do. Like Siegrist she wasn't heavily recruited and like Siegrist she sustained an injury that prevented her from playing her first season in college. Weird,right? Siegrist is 6'2" and Pelish is 6'0" but seems to be a better 3-pt shooter and defender than Siegrist was at the same point in their careers. Will she be the next Siegrist? Probably not but only time will tell. But certainly there's a lot of potential. Recruiting has become a 365 days/yr job and a successful coach will need to recruit great players from the portal, great players coming out of high school, and great international players. Cullop has achieved all 3 levels in only her first full year at the helm - which is why I pick Miami as one of the 2 teams I think will challenge this year. A few more stats for nerds:
In the ACC Miami has #1 rebounder in the conference(Peterson-12), #4(Kyle-8.7)and #5(Kone-8.1). Miami has the #1 player in FG%(Kyle-59.38), #2(Kimpson-50.74),#6(Peterson-45.80) and #7(Raviv-44.79). Miami has the #2 player in most FT's made(Kyle - 137). Miami has the #2 player in assists/game(Raviv - 4.3).Miami has the #5 player in FT%(Kimpson-83.33), #7(Kone-78.80), #8(Kyle-78.29), #11(Blasigh-75.00) and #12(Raviv-74.78). Miami has the #5 player in 3-pt%(Kimpson-37.40) and #7(Blasigh-36.70).

In conclusion I believe this year's Miami team has tremendous potential. I think Cullop went out and secured the right players for her system and has had the time for the players to learn and buy into that system as well as the time for the team to really come together as a true "team" unlike a year ago. Cullop has a strong support staff and has been tireless in her recruiting efforts. I am expecting this team to make a leap forward and finish around a high of 4th and a low of 8th place. It doesn't hurt that most of their tougher games (NC St, Louisville, Duke, Stanford) are at home.
 
All right Miami is up next.

Tricia Cullop's first season at the P4 level and in the ACC conference did not go so well. They began the pre-season ranked approximately #35 and finished the season unranked. Season one for Cullop left Miami with a record of 14-15 overall(.483) and a dismal 4-14 in the conference(.222). In her defense the unexpected retirement of Meier and the lateness of her hire left many of the better players in the portal already taken. Worse was the ensuing departure of so many very good players (Latson, Spearman, Oldacre, Day-Wilson,Williams,Dwyer) who all went on to be key contributors on other(mostly highly ranked) teams. It was definitely a disappointing season but the fact that they were even considered to be around #35 pre-season ranking tells you what the "experts" thought of both Cullop as a coach and the team she ultimately assembled. Their final two games of the season were lopsided losses on the west coast to Stanford and Cal. Miami absolutely underachieved and both the coaching staff and the players are partially responsible. If not for the return of the Cavinder twins a bad season would have been a total disaster. Can Cullop turn things around in year two ? Although nothing is certain I would say emphatically yes!

What was lost: All starting 5 plus 2 key contributors along with 3 other bench players : total of 10 players. That didn't leave very much. Gone to graduation are starting post players C.Williams (6'3" 11.7ppg) and N.Marshall (6'5" 7.7ppg). Haley Cavinder (their leading scorer18.2ppg and assist leader) along with sister Hanna (6.9ppg) and 2nd in assists, J.Roberts one of the few who stayed on after the coaching change (10.0ppg) and 6th "man" D.Rogers (7.0ppg). L.Hylton (2.6ppg) was a key contributor off the bench but has moved on to join TX A&M. Also hitting the portal were L.Harmon(2.8ppg) to UCF, A.Almon (1.3ppg) to Syracuse, and D.Abies(2.3ppg) to St. John's. In total they lost 6 experienced guards and 4 post players.

What remains: Returning are only 2 players : backup pg A.Adams (So. 5'6" G 3.7ppg) and S.Pelish(rs Fr. 6'0" G) who did not play last year due to an injury - more on that later.

Incoming transfers: 7 total players of which I expect 5 will be starters and another the 6th player/1st player off the bench. First up is Ra Shaya Kyle from Florida (Gr. 6'6" C 14.1ppg) and Jessica Peterson from SMU (Gr. 6'2" P 10.3ppg). Also coming in are Mya Kone (rs Jr. 6'2" F/W 11.4ppg) from FIU, V.Blasigh (Jr. 5'9" G 10.4ppg) from USF, A.Kimpson (Jr. 5'8" G 14.5ppg) from UNLV, G.Raviv (So. 5'9" G 17.9ppg) from Quinnipiac/Israel, and finally C.Kpetikou (rs So. 6'3" C 3.4ppg) via Wash.St./Niger.

Incoming freshmen: 5 players : #36 C.Williams (they lost a C.Williams to grduation and got one back lol) (5'11" G), #54 D.Osho (6'1" F), #80 N.Wetzel (6'3" F), #91 M.Tippner (5'10" G), and UR S.Okolo (6'1" F).


So what went wrong last year and why do I think they can turn it around ? As for last year Miami's ACC record stood at 1-2 after 3 games (including a decent showing against NC) but that's where the problems began. Miami hosted VT and was up double digits halfway through the 4th quarter - and blew the game, losing by 4. That was a game they should have won especially when you consider the starting 5 was made up of veterans: 4 grad-students and a senior (along with 6th player also being a grad student). VT and Miami's seasons diverged after this game - VT becoming competetive and nearly making the tournament and Miami going the opposite direction. What followed were 6 games of which 5 were winnable. They lost by 5 at Syracuse, by 4 at home to BC, by 22 at FSU(expected loss), by 3 at Clemson, won by 7 over SMU, and won by 3 over VA. Miami SHOULD have been 7-3 at this point but instead was 3-7. They only won 1 more game the rest of the season - a measly 2 point win at home over hapless WF. For whatever reasons Miami just didn't seem to "jell" as a team all that well. Is that the coaches fault or the players? I think it was some of both but mostly it was just circumstances. And a learning curve that both had trouble overcoming.

So why do I think they can turn it around in one season? Many reasons. Number one is coaching. Cullop admitted she had adjutments to make after her first season. She recognized the importance of having over-achieving starters from lesser teams over having back up players from top teams when it comes to mining the portal for talent. It also helps to get mostly players for more than one season rather than the one-and-done players because they need to REALLY know your system in order to excell in it. Cullop also recognized Miami needed more Size, Physicality, and Speed. Cullop was able to round up a Top 15 portal class but more importantly landed what could be a really solid starting 5 + 1 as well as what I think may be THE best front court in the ACC this year. The starting tandem of R.S. Kyle and J.Peterson is scary. Of the players having dbl-dbls last year Miami has both #3 and #4 in the ACC - Kyle with 16 and Peterson with 14. Only Ziegler(Louisville transfer from St. Joseph's)with 20 and Pierre(NC St. transfer from Vandy) with 17 have more. Just for comparison Betts/UCLA (19), Prince/TCU(16), Strack/KY(15) and Beers/OK(15). Only UCONN is close with S.Williams(14) and Strong(13) as a duo and KY with Strack(15) and Key(12). In the ACC the only teams that might be able to challenge them would be NC St (with Trygger/Pierre) and FSU (Davis/Kubek).
Cullop also addresssed the backcourt with G.Raviv (MAAC POTY and ROTY), A.Kimpson (Mt.West Conf. former FOTY), V.Blasigh (AAC former FOTY), and M.Kone(former 6th POTY). All six players are double digit scorers.

Cullop's system also needs depth in order for it to be successful. That's where recruiting last year's #10 class comes in. So I envision something along the following: Starting Center Kyle (6'6") backed up by Kpetikou(6'3") and freshman Wetzel (6'3"), Starting Forward (6'2" Peterson) backed up by Kone (6'2") and freshman Osho(6'1"), Starting Guard Raviv(5'9") backed up by freshman Williams (5'11") and freshman Tippner (5'10"), Starting Guard Basleigh (5'9") backed up by rs freshman Pelish (6'0") and freshman Okolo (6'1"), Starting Guard Kimpson (5'8") backed up by so. Adams (5'6"). Adams was ranked #41 in the 2024 class. There is footage out there of Okolo dunking the ball both one-handed and two-handed and nearly dunking on an alley-oop play. She has an insane vertical for 6'1" ! Wetzel is said to be Miami's best pure 3-point shooter and at 6'3" could stretch the floor. And now we come to rs freshman Pelish. For those that read every crazy set of stats I put out there she is the "mystery girl" from New York's all-time scorers list. She attended the same h.s. as Maddy Siegrist and had the same coach years apart. She broke most of Siegrist's records and also took her team to the state title which Siegrist did not do. Like Siegrist she wasn't heavily recruited and like Siegrist she sustained an injury that prevented her from playing her first season in college. Weird,right? Siegrist is 6'2" and Pelish is 6'0" but seems to be a better 3-pt shooter and defender than Siegrist was at the same point in their careers. Will she be the next Siegrist? Probably not but only time will tell. But certainly there's a lot of potential. Recruiting has become a 365 days/yr job and a successful coach will need to recruit great players from the portal, great players coming out of high school, and great international players. Cullop has achieved all 3 levels in only her first full year at the helm - which is why I pick Miami as one of the 2 teams I think will challenge this year. A few more stats for nerds:
In the ACC Miami has #1 rebounder in the conference(Peterson-12), #4(Kyle-8.7)and #5(Kone-8.1). Miami has the #1 player in FG%(Kyle-59.38), #2(Kimpson-50.74),#6(Peterson-45.80) and #7(Raviv-44.79). Miami has the #2 player in most FT's made(Kyle - 137). Miami has the #2 player in assists/game(Raviv - 4.3).Miami has the #5 player in FT%(Kimpson-83.33), #7(Kone-78.80), #8(Kyle-78.29), #11(Blasigh-75.00) and #12(Raviv-74.78). Miami has the #5 player in 3-pt%(Kimpson-37.40) and #7(Blasigh-36.70).

In conclusion I believe this year's Miami team has tremendous potential. I think Cullop went out and secured the right players for her system and has had the time for the players to learn and buy into that system as well as the time for the team to really come together as a true "team" unlike a year ago. Cullop has a strong support staff and has been tireless in her recruiting efforts. I am expecting this team to make a leap forward and finish around a high of 4th and a low of 8th place. It doesn't hurt that most of their tougher games (NC St, Louisville, Duke, Stanford) are at home.
Raviv is really good. It’ll be a big jump going from the MAAC to the ACC, but I like the fit.
 
All right Miami is up next.

Tricia Cullop's first season at the P4 level and in the ACC conference did not go so well. They began the pre-season ranked approximately #35 and finished the season unranked. Season one for Cullop left Miami with a record of 14-15 overall(.483) and a dismal 4-14 in the conference(.222). In her defense the unexpected retirement of Meier and the lateness of her hire left many of the better players in the portal already taken. Worse was the ensuing departure of so many very good players (Latson, Spearman, Oldacre, Day-Wilson,Williams,Dwyer) who all went on to be key contributors on other(mostly highly ranked) teams. It was definitely a disappointing season but the fact that they were even considered to be around #35 pre-season ranking tells you what the "experts" thought of both Cullop as a coach and the team she ultimately assembled. Their final two games of the season were lopsided losses on the west coast to Stanford and Cal. Miami absolutely underachieved and both the coaching staff and the players are partially responsible. If not for the return of the Cavinder twins a bad season would have been a total disaster. Can Cullop turn things around in year two ? Although nothing is certain I would say emphatically yes!

What was lost: All starting 5 plus 2 key contributors along with 3 other bench players : total of 10 players. That didn't leave very much. Gone to graduation are starting post players C.Williams (6'3" 11.7ppg) and N.Marshall (6'5" 7.7ppg). Haley Cavinder (their leading scorer18.2ppg and assist leader) along with sister Hanna (6.9ppg) and 2nd in assists, J.Roberts one of the few who stayed on after the coaching change (10.0ppg) and 6th "man" D.Rogers (7.0ppg). L.Hylton (2.6ppg) was a key contributor off the bench but has moved on to join TX A&M. Also hitting the portal were L.Harmon(2.8ppg) to UCF, A.Almon (1.3ppg) to Syracuse, and D.Abies(2.3ppg) to St. John's. In total they lost 6 experienced guards and 4 post players.

What remains: Returning are only 2 players : backup pg A.Adams (So. 5'6" G 3.7ppg) and S.Pelish(rs Fr. 6'0" G) who did not play last year due to an injury - more on that later.

Incoming transfers: 7 total players of which I expect 5 will be starters and another the 6th player/1st player off the bench. First up is Ra Shaya Kyle from Florida (Gr. 6'6" C 14.1ppg) and Jessica Peterson from SMU (Gr. 6'2" P 10.3ppg). Also coming in are Mya Kone (rs Jr. 6'2" F/W 11.4ppg) from FIU, V.Blasigh (Jr. 5'9" G 10.4ppg) from USF, A.Kimpson (Jr. 5'8" G 14.5ppg) from UNLV, G.Raviv (So. 5'9" G 17.9ppg) from Quinnipiac/Israel, and finally C.Kpetikou (rs So. 6'3" C 3.4ppg) via Wash.St./Niger.

Incoming freshmen: 5 players : #36 C.Williams (they lost a C.Williams to grduation and got one back lol) (5'11" G), #54 D.Osho (6'1" F), #80 N.Wetzel (6'3" F), #91 M.Tippner (5'10" G), and UR S.Okolo (6'1" F).


So what went wrong last year and why do I think they can turn it around ? As for last year Miami's ACC record stood at 1-2 after 3 games (including a decent showing against NC) but that's where the problems began. Miami hosted VT and was up double digits halfway through the 4th quarter - and blew the game, losing by 4. That was a game they should have won especially when you consider the starting 5 was made up of veterans: 4 grad-students and a senior (along with 6th player also being a grad student). VT and Miami's seasons diverged after this game - VT becoming competetive and nearly making the tournament and Miami going the opposite direction. What followed were 6 games of which 5 were winnable. They lost by 5 at Syracuse, by 4 at home to BC, by 22 at FSU(expected loss), by 3 at Clemson, won by 7 over SMU, and won by 3 over VA. Miami SHOULD have been 7-3 at this point but instead was 3-7. They only won 1 more game the rest of the season - a measly 2 point win at home over hapless WF. For whatever reasons Miami just didn't seem to "jell" as a team all that well. Is that the coaches fault or the players? I think it was some of both but mostly it was just circumstances. And a learning curve that both had trouble overcoming.

So why do I think they can turn it around in one season? Many reasons. Number one is coaching. Cullop admitted she had adjutments to make after her first season. She recognized the importance of having over-achieving starters from lesser teams over having back up players from top teams when it comes to mining the portal for talent. It also helps to get mostly players for more than one season rather than the one-and-done players because they need to REALLY know your system in order to excell in it. Cullop also recognized Miami needed more Size, Physicality, and Speed. Cullop was able to round up a Top 15 portal class but more importantly landed what could be a really solid starting 5 + 1 as well as what I think may be THE best front court in the ACC this year. The starting tandem of R.S. Kyle and J.Peterson is scary. Of the players having dbl-dbls last year Miami has both #3 and #4 in the ACC - Kyle with 16 and Peterson with 14. Only Ziegler(Louisville transfer from St. Joseph's)with 20 and Pierre(NC St. transfer from Vandy) with 17 have more. Just for comparison Betts/UCLA (19), Prince/TCU(16), Strack/KY(15) and Beers/OK(15). Only UCONN is close with S.Williams(14) and Strong(13) as a duo and KY with Strack(15) and Key(12). In the ACC the only teams that might be able to challenge them would be NC St (with Trygger/Pierre) and FSU (Davis/Kubek).
Cullop also addresssed the backcourt with G.Raviv (MAAC POTY and ROTY), A.Kimpson (Mt.West Conf. former FOTY), V.Blasigh (AAC former FOTY), and M.Kone(former 6th POTY). All six players are double digit scorers.

Cullop's system also needs depth in order for it to be successful. That's where recruiting last year's #10 class comes in. So I envision something along the following: Starting Center Kyle (6'6") backed up by Kpetikou(6'3") and freshman Wetzel (6'3"), Starting Forward (6'2" Peterson) backed up by Kone (6'2") and freshman Osho(6'1"), Starting Guard Raviv(5'9") backed up by freshman Williams (5'11") and freshman Tippner (5'10"), Starting Guard Basleigh (5'9") backed up by rs freshman Pelish (6'0") and freshman Okolo (6'1"), Starting Guard Kimpson (5'8") backed up by so. Adams (5'6"). Adams was ranked #41 in the 2024 class. There is footage out there of Okolo dunking the ball both one-handed and two-handed and nearly dunking on an alley-oop play. She has an insane vertical for 6'1" ! Wetzel is said to be Miami's best pure 3-point shooter and at 6'3" could stretch the floor. And now we come to rs freshman Pelish. For those that read every crazy set of stats I put out there she is the "mystery girl" from New York's all-time scorers list. She attended the same h.s. as Maddy Siegrist and had the same coach years apart. She broke most of Siegrist's records and also took her team to the state title which Siegrist did not do. Like Siegrist she wasn't heavily recruited and like Siegrist she sustained an injury that prevented her from playing her first season in college. Weird,right? Siegrist is 6'2" and Pelish is 6'0" but seems to be a better 3-pt shooter and defender than Siegrist was at the same point in their careers. Will she be the next Siegrist? Probably not but only time will tell. But certainly there's a lot of potential. Recruiting has become a 365 days/yr job and a successful coach will need to recruit great players from the portal, great players coming out of high school, and great international players. Cullop has achieved all 3 levels in only her first full year at the helm - which is why I pick Miami as one of the 2 teams I think will challenge this year. A few more stats for nerds:
In the ACC Miami has #1 rebounder in the conference(Peterson-12), #4(Kyle-8.7)and #5(Kone-8.1). Miami has the #1 player in FG%(Kyle-59.38), #2(Kimpson-50.74),#6(Peterson-45.80) and #7(Raviv-44.79). Miami has the #2 player in most FT's made(Kyle - 137). Miami has the #2 player in assists/game(Raviv - 4.3).Miami has the #5 player in FT%(Kimpson-83.33), #7(Kone-78.80), #8(Kyle-78.29), #11(Blasigh-75.00) and #12(Raviv-74.78). Miami has the #5 player in 3-pt%(Kimpson-37.40) and #7(Blasigh-36.70).

In conclusion I believe this year's Miami team has tremendous potential. I think Cullop went out and secured the right players for her system and has had the time for the players to learn and buy into that system as well as the time for the team to really come together as a true "team" unlike a year ago. Cullop has a strong support staff and has been tireless in her recruiting efforts. I am expecting this team to make a leap forward and finish around a high of 4th and a low of 8th place. It doesn't hurt that most of their tougher games (NC St, Louisville, Duke, Stanford) are at home.
Wow! I hadn’t realized the extent to which Miami had been stripped bare by the portal over the previous couple of years. It’s almost like the rest of the SEC used them as a farm system.
 
.-.
Had the players decided to stay and play for Cullop, Miami may have had a similar level of success akin to what her former MAC colleague Robyn Fralick has had at Michigan State. Their teams were very competitive and I found their games fun to watch when they were both in the MAC.
 
Had the players decided to stay and play for Cullop, Miami may have had a similar level of success akin to what her former MAC colleague Robyn Fralick has had at Michigan State. Their teams were very competitive and I found their games fun to watch when they were both in the MAC.
Hopefully Cullop can get Miami's defense to be similar to Michigan State's. I really enjoyed watching them last year. They could be behind double digits heading in to the fourth quarter - and then BAM! that defense took over. It was exciting and fun to watch them knowing what was coming.
 
All right Miami is up next.

Tricia Cullop's first season at the P4 level and in the ACC conference did not go so well. They began the pre-season ranked approximately #35 and finished the season unranked. Season one for Cullop left Miami with a record of 14-15 overall(.483) and a dismal 4-14 in the conference(.222). In her defense the unexpected retirement of Meier and the lateness of her hire left many of the better players in the portal already taken. Worse was the ensuing departure of so many very good players (Latson, Spearman, Oldacre, Day-Wilson,Williams,Dwyer) who all went on to be key contributors on other(mostly highly ranked) teams. It was definitely a disappointing season but the fact that they were even considered to be around #35 pre-season ranking tells you what the "experts" thought of both Cullop as a coach and the team she ultimately assembled. Their final two games of the season were lopsided losses on the west coast to Stanford and Cal. Miami absolutely underachieved and both the coaching staff and the players are partially responsible. If not for the return of the Cavinder twins a bad season would have been a total disaster. Can Cullop turn things around in year two ? Although nothing is certain I would say emphatically yes!

What was lost: All starting 5 plus 2 key contributors along with 3 other bench players : total of 10 players. That didn't leave very much. Gone to graduation are starting post players C.Williams (6'3" 11.7ppg) and N.Marshall (6'5" 7.7ppg). Haley Cavinder (their leading scorer18.2ppg and assist leader) along with sister Hanna (6.9ppg) and 2nd in assists, J.Roberts one of the few who stayed on after the coaching change (10.0ppg) and 6th "man" D.Rogers (7.0ppg). L.Hylton (2.6ppg) was a key contributor off the bench but has moved on to join TX A&M. Also hitting the portal were L.Harmon(2.8ppg) to UCF, A.Almon (1.3ppg) to Syracuse, and D.Abies(2.3ppg) to St. John's. In total they lost 6 experienced guards and 4 post players.

What remains: Returning are only 2 players : backup pg A.Adams (So. 5'6" G 3.7ppg) and S.Pelish(rs Fr. 6'0" G) who did not play last year due to an injury - more on that later.

Incoming transfers: 7 total players of which I expect 5 will be starters and another the 6th player/1st player off the bench. First up is Ra Shaya Kyle from Florida (Gr. 6'6" C 14.1ppg) and Jessica Peterson from SMU (Gr. 6'2" P 10.3ppg). Also coming in are Mya Kone (rs Jr. 6'2" F/W 11.4ppg) from FIU, V.Blasigh (Jr. 5'9" G 10.4ppg) from USF, A.Kimpson (Jr. 5'8" G 14.5ppg) from UNLV, G.Raviv (So. 5'9" G 17.9ppg) from Quinnipiac/Israel, and finally C.Kpetikou (rs So. 6'3" C 3.4ppg) via Wash.St./Niger.

Incoming freshmen: 5 players : #36 C.Williams (they lost a C.Williams to grduation and got one back lol) (5'11" G), #54 D.Osho (6'1" F), #80 N.Wetzel (6'3" F), #91 M.Tippner (5'10" G), and UR S.Okolo (6'1" F).


So what went wrong last year and why do I think they can turn it around ? As for last year Miami's ACC record stood at 1-2 after 3 games (including a decent showing against NC) but that's where the problems began. Miami hosted VT and was up double digits halfway through the 4th quarter - and blew the game, losing by 4. That was a game they should have won especially when you consider the starting 5 was made up of veterans: 4 grad-students and a senior (along with 6th player also being a grad student). VT and Miami's seasons diverged after this game - VT becoming competetive and nearly making the tournament and Miami going the opposite direction. What followed were 6 games of which 5 were winnable. They lost by 5 at Syracuse, by 4 at home to BC, by 22 at FSU(expected loss), by 3 at Clemson, won by 7 over SMU, and won by 3 over VA. Miami SHOULD have been 7-3 at this point but instead was 3-7. They only won 1 more game the rest of the season - a measly 2 point win at home over hapless WF. For whatever reasons Miami just didn't seem to "jell" as a team all that well. Is that the coaches fault or the players? I think it was some of both but mostly it was just circumstances. And a learning curve that both had trouble overcoming.

So why do I think they can turn it around in one season? Many reasons. Number one is coaching. Cullop admitted she had adjutments to make after her first season. She recognized the importance of having over-achieving starters from lesser teams over having back up players from top teams when it comes to mining the portal for talent. It also helps to get mostly players for more than one season rather than the one-and-done players because they need to REALLY know your system in order to excell in it. Cullop also recognized Miami needed more Size, Physicality, and Speed. Cullop was able to round up a Top 15 portal class but more importantly landed what could be a really solid starting 5 + 1 as well as what I think may be THE best front court in the ACC this year. The starting tandem of R.S. Kyle and J.Peterson is scary. Of the players having dbl-dbls last year Miami has both #3 and #4 in the ACC - Kyle with 16 and Peterson with 14. Only Ziegler(Louisville transfer from St. Joseph's)with 20 and Pierre(NC St. transfer from Vandy) with 17 have more. Just for comparison Betts/UCLA (19), Prince/TCU(16), Strack/KY(15) and Beers/OK(15). Only UCONN is close with S.Williams(14) and Strong(13) as a duo and KY with Strack(15) and Key(12). In the ACC the only teams that might be able to challenge them would be NC St (with Trygger/Pierre) and FSU (Davis/Kubek).
Cullop also addresssed the backcourt with G.Raviv (MAAC POTY and ROTY), A.Kimpson (Mt.West Conf. former FOTY), V.Blasigh (AAC former FOTY), and M.Kone(former 6th POTY). All six players are double digit scorers.

Cullop's system also needs depth in order for it to be successful. That's where recruiting last year's #10 class comes in. So I envision something along the following: Starting Center Kyle (6'6") backed up by Kpetikou(6'3") and freshman Wetzel (6'3"), Starting Forward (6'2" Peterson) backed up by Kone (6'2") and freshman Osho(6'1"), Starting Guard Raviv(5'9") backed up by freshman Williams (5'11") and freshman Tippner (5'10"), Starting Guard Basleigh (5'9") backed up by rs freshman Pelish (6'0") and freshman Okolo (6'1"), Starting Guard Kimpson (5'8") backed up by so. Adams (5'6"). Adams was ranked #41 in the 2024 class. There is footage out there of Okolo dunking the ball both one-handed and two-handed and nearly dunking on an alley-oop play. She has an insane vertical for 6'1" ! Wetzel is said to be Miami's best pure 3-point shooter and at 6'3" could stretch the floor. And now we come to rs freshman Pelish. For those that read every crazy set of stats I put out there she is the "mystery girl" from New York's all-time scorers list. She attended the same h.s. as Maddy Siegrist and had the same coach years apart. She broke most of Siegrist's records and also took her team to the state title which Siegrist did not do. Like Siegrist she wasn't heavily recruited and like Siegrist she sustained an injury that prevented her from playing her first season in college. Weird,right? Siegrist is 6'2" and Pelish is 6'0" but seems to be a better 3-pt shooter and defender than Siegrist was at the same point in their careers. Will she be the next Siegrist? Probably not but only time will tell. But certainly there's a lot of potential. Recruiting has become a 365 days/yr job and a successful coach will need to recruit great players from the portal, great players coming out of high school, and great international players. Cullop has achieved all 3 levels in only her first full year at the helm - which is why I pick Miami as one of the 2 teams I think will challenge this year. A few more stats for nerds:
In the ACC Miami has #1 rebounder in the conference(Peterson-12), #4(Kyle-8.7)and #5(Kone-8.1). Miami has the #1 player in FG%(Kyle-59.38), #2(Kimpson-50.74),#6(Peterson-45.80) and #7(Raviv-44.79). Miami has the #2 player in most FT's made(Kyle - 137). Miami has the #2 player in assists/game(Raviv - 4.3).Miami has the #5 player in FT%(Kimpson-83.33), #7(Kone-78.80), #8(Kyle-78.29), #11(Blasigh-75.00) and #12(Raviv-74.78). Miami has the #5 player in 3-pt%(Kimpson-37.40) and #7(Blasigh-36.70).

In conclusion I believe this year's Miami team has tremendous potential. I think Cullop went out and secured the right players for her system and has had the time for the players to learn and buy into that system as well as the time for the team to really come together as a true "team" unlike a year ago. Cullop has a strong support staff and has been tireless in her recruiting efforts. I am expecting this team to make a leap forward and finish around a high of 4th and a low of 8th place. It doesn't hurt that most of their tougher games (NC St, Louisville, Duke, Stanford) are at home.
Rooster, great analysis again. Your optimism and excitement for the 'Canes is very apparent.

I will start off by stating that Miami picked up my favorite South Florida Bull - Vittoria Blasigh - from the portal. Blasigh is a beautiful player to watch: superb court vision, crisp, darting passes and a beautiful jump shot that carried the Bulls in over two dozen games in her first two years. Non-stop energy who glides down the court and runs defenders into screens better than almost every non-Huskie player I've seen. IMO, she will be on the Italian National Women's Team in the not-too-distant future. I am disheartened that she left the Bulls, but it was clear that the Bulls were not able to capitalize on or develop her skills. Hopefully, Miami can in both regards.

That said, I think Cullop will be tested on how well she can weave a team of players that don't know each other into a cohesive unit. As you pointed out, last year was eye-brow raising in her inability to get an experienced group to play together, and more importantly, fight for one another. With four 1,000 point scorers on their team, the Hurricanes were a group of individuals without a team identity.

I also think the Miami question marks began well before the VT game. After a cupcake schedule start, the thrashing by Vanderbilt at home in which the 'Canes shot almost 53% from the field with eight steals - but also committed 21 turnovers - was an ominous harbinger of things to come. Overall, last season's conference results were perplexing with a few blowout losses intertwined with a handful of games lost by single digits in the fourth quarter. In their last two games, it seemed like they simply gave up.

If Cullop can get these players to believe in each other then finishing in the top half of the conference is a distinct possibility. To rise up out of the ashes and make it to the Big Dance would be quite an achievement. Regardless, it will be fun watching what strides they can make.
 
Rooster, great analysis again. Your optimism and excitement for the 'Canes is very apparent.

I will start off by stating that Miami picked up my favorite South Florida Bull - Vittoria Blasigh - from the portal. Blasigh is a beautiful player to watch: superb court vision, crisp, darting passes and a beautiful jump shot that carried the Bulls in over two dozen games in her first two years. Non-stop energy who glides down the court and runs defenders into screens better than almost every non-Huskie player I've seen. IMO, she will be on the Italian National Women's Team in the not-too-distant future. I am disheartened that she left the Bulls, but it was clear that the Bulls were not able to capitalize on or develop her skills. Hopefully, Miami can in both regards.

That said, I think Cullop will be tested on how well she can weave a team of players that don't know each other into a cohesive unit. As you pointed out, last year was eye-brow raising in her inability to get an experienced group to play together, and more importantly, fight for one another. With four 1,000 point scorers on their team, the Hurricanes were a group of individuals without a team identity.

I also think the Miami question marks began well before the VT game. After a cupcake schedule start, the thrashing by Vanderbilt at home in which the 'Canes shot almost 53% from the field with eight steals - but also committed 21 turnovers - was an ominous harbinger of things to come. Overall, last season's conference results were perplexing with a few blowout losses intertwined with a handful of games lost by single digits in the fourth quarter. In their last two games, it seemed like they simply gave up.

If Cullop can get these players to believe in each other then finishing in the top half of the conference is a distinct possibility. To rise up out of the ashes and make it to the Big Dance would be quite an achievement. Regardless, it will be fun watching what strides they can make.
Really nothing to add here or reply to. I felt your comments/analysis really was spot on in everything you said here. My optimism stems from having watched the "Road to March" episode 1(I assume they'll be more) and other practice clips they've put out which leads me to believe this year's team will not have the problems last year's team had. Since the time I wrote that Talia Goodman over at On3 sports put out her ACC preview power rankings and listed Miami as 7th - which should get them to the tournament if correct (8th and you're on the bubble I think) - also a good analysis of all the ACC teams by her and worth the reading. You were correct in that turnovers were really a very big issue for them last year and kept them from winning many close games. Hopefully they'll be causing turnovers this season rather than committing them.
 
.-.
Rooster, I’ve truly enjoyed these previews. Very interesting and informative . I assume you’ll be doing the SEC next? 😅
 
Rooster, I’ve truly enjoyed these previews. Very interesting and informative . I assume you’ll be doing the SEC next? 😅
Thank you for the kind words but I think I'll leave that for somebody over in the SEC Forums lol
 
.-.
ACC: Commits in 2026 ESPN NEXT 100 So Far:

Cal, GT, VA, BC, SYR, PITT, MIA, WF - 0

(Duke - 3, ND - 3, Clem - 3, NC - 2, Lou. - 2, NC St. - 2, SMU - 2, FSU - 1, VT - 1, Stan. - 1)
 
Last edited:
ACC commits in 20266 ESPN NEXT 100 so far:

Duke - 4, ND - 3, Clem - 3, NC - 2, Lou - 2, NC St - 2, SMU - 2, FSU - 1, Stan - 1

CAL, MIA, VA, GT, SYR, PITT, BC, WF - 0

Heck man, my team gotta get 2 or 3 just to keep pace wth?!
 
.-.
ACC commits in 20266 ESPN NEXT 100 so far:

Duke - 4, ND - 3, Clem - 3, NC - 2, Lou - 2, NC St - 2, SMU - 2, FSU - 1, Stan - 1

CAL, MIA, VA, GT, SYR, PITT, BC, WF - 0

Heck man, my team gotta get 2 or 3 just to keep pace wth?!
Wow!!

Just looking at this when it’s all said and done Clemson & ND could be at 4 and FSU could end up with 3!!!
 
Wow!!

Just looking at this when it’s all said and done Clemson & ND could be at 4 and FSU could end up with 3!!!
The ACC is having a good year overall. I expect Stanford to land 1 more also. Miami is still in the mix for 3 but realistically will probably get 1 which is okay since they got 4 last year. The gap between the "haves" and "have-nots" is going to grow larger every year unless college sports figures something out - and that goes for every conference and every sport.
 
The ACC is having a good year overall. I expect Stanford to land 1 more also. Miami is still in the mix for 3 but realistically will probably get 1 which is okay since they got 4 last year. The gap between the "haves" and "have-nots" is going to grow larger every year unless college sports figures something out - and that goes for every conference and every sport.


Wouldn't be so sure about that with what we're seeing in football. This was an interesting article talking about how it seems like parity is starting to emerge. Considering some of the upsets this season, he may have a point.
 


Wouldn't be so sure about that with what we're seeing in football. This was an interesting article talking about how it seems like parity is starting to emerge. Considering some of the upsets this season, he may have a point.

I personally believe this parity is short-term while the new Bluebloods are establishing themselves, but ultimately will end up in a new list of 'haves' and 'have nots'. The Bluebloods will no longer be those teams with the tradition/championship legacy, but the universities who have the donors with the deepest pockets...
 
Wouldn't be so sure about that with what we're seeing in football. This was an interesting article talking about how it seems like parity is starting to emerge. Considering some of the upsets this season, he may have a point.
Although he makes some valid points overall he's making too much out of too little. The "blue-bloods" will rise to the top as always. The $$$ is there. The transfer portal and NIL will make quick corrections and programs will adjust from developing young talent to assembling proven talent through the portal every year. Which coaches can master that will be the ones the big programs will hire away from lesser programs. It will take a few years for those adjustments to happen but it will happen. If Tennessee decides down the road that Sweet 16 finishes aren't good enough they'll come a-callin to the doorstep of Kara Lawson. Will Penn State go after Indiana's head football coach at the end of the season? There will always be some outliers every year but only over the next few years will we see anything resembling parity. Even now programs like Boston College,Rutgers,Purdue,Wisconsin,etc. are falling further and further behind across the board. Enjoy it while it lasts. I know I will but ultimately look at which programs are in the playoff and tournaments every year and which are in the Final Four and championship game. In this country sports is like everything else - we do have a King and it's name is MONEY.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,263
Messages
4,560,481
Members
10,452
Latest member
WashingtonH


Top Bottom