Thought Provoking: Fans Don't Follow Women To Pros

[BroadwayVa]

I try watching the WNBA (I don't watch the MNBA at all), but I don't think it's very good basketball. The reason I follow UConn is because they play an astonishingly good game of team basketball. But, as bad as the MNBA is, the WNBA may be worse, for good reason. To make financial ends meet, most of the players have to play year round, and the teams can't do a lot of preseason practice because of other commitments. I like the proportions of the women's pro game and I have far more emotional interest it that lingers from watching their college game. But I become distressed when I think back to how disciplined and cohesively UConn and other top WCBB teams play in comparison.

I second these opinions---however going way back--Pro Men's BB was a better game--College, if you have any commitment to a College that has a lot more emotional attachment --and to me at the games --a better atmosphere.

 

[wire chief]

I'M AN ECHO OF MANY ABOVE. mY ALLEGIANCE TO UConn GOES BACK TO '95. tHE PACKAGE OF GENO, cd AND PLAYERS WHO GET UNDER OUR SKIN OVER 4 YEARS is the selling point. That does not translate to the pros. I intended to watch Seattle at LA, then found out the 2 UConn starters were out, then interest diminished.
I will catch the games where our grads are expected to play. Also looking forward to NY & Minny being on TV.

 

[BroadwayVa]

"Consider this: The 2017 women’s college basketball NCAA championship game between Mississippi State and South Carolina drew 3.8 million viewers between live and streaming. But the fifth game of the 2016 WNBA Finals (which was won by the Los Angeles Sparks on a dramatic buzzer-beater tossed up by Nneka Ogwumike) drew about 528,000 viewers—a drastic gap."

http://deadspin.com/why-arent-womens-basketball-fans-following-their-player-1795024988

“You can walk up to anyone in the [Connecticut] area and mention the Sun and they will know exactly what you are talking about,” said Amber Cox, vice president of the Connecticut Sun. “Because of UConn, there is no barrier against women’s basketball that you face in other markets. In most cases, when you are selling women’s basketball you have to first explain why women’s basketball is good basketball. In this state, that conversation never has to happen.”

Cox later added: “One of the things we have working in our favor is we do have the luxury of getting great coverage. It’s not a super saturated market. The reason it’s so important to tell the players’ stories is because we need people to come out and support beyond just one game. There are so many great stories on this team that aren’t being told by traditional media.”

In Montana you don't have to explain WBB? In this state, that conversation never has to happen.”

 

[CL82]

Remember that the NBA struggled for viewers early on as well. It was the Bird/Magic rivalry that jumped it to another level. That's what the WNBA needs. Not an easy thing to manufacture. I suppose the best shot was when UConn and Tennessee were bumping heads. A dominant UConn and a dominant Tennessee player could have primed the pumps for more viewership. That said, the short season, lack of 'sports center plays' not just dunks, but yeah, dunks, dooms it. I'm actually surprised that it has lasted as long as it has.

That said, I stop and watch for a minute or two when UConn players are playing, but my interest isn't held very long.

 

[RockyMTblue2]

In Montana you don't have to explain WBB? In this state, that conversation never has to happen.”

The reference (in an article quote) is to CT not MT Broadway.

 

[BroadwayVa]

The reference (in an article quote) is to CT not MT Broadway.

Tweaking ---!!