- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 6,382
- Reaction Score
- 8,411
Have they totally screwed up?
Diaco came in and kept one existing coach - Mike Foley. His mentor had to be part of that conversation. Foley was the guy that created many raw Connecticut players into solid players over a half dozen years. For instance, in 2006 the stories of Will Beatty & Donald Thomas & Zach Hurd. Then Mo Petrus. Diaco doubled down with that by bringing his colleague Mike Cummings, who has the distinction of taking a really raw Eric Fisher at Central Michigan and turning him into the First Pick of the NFL Draft. I don't believe, collectively, that these guys looked at the roster and didn't know 2014 was going to be extremely challenging. (and to my eye, the one consistent kid (Gus Cruz) wasn't even supposed to play in February)
Recruiting in January? Rutherford was on board - a good pickup as he was desired by other bigger programs. But Crozier and Oak were classic late bloomers; kids from Florida that didn't make the first tier but played great their Senior years and earned the push. Could Diaco/Cummings et al bring in the whole group of JUCO and transfer kids - that are less evaluative risk (but maybe MORE character risk). Addazio has done this. Cincinnati has done this when needed. USF has repeatedly done this. I think Diaco - with a ND mindset - fought this path. They went with what was in the cupboard; and they damn sure are out hard trying to get OLine types in their class for Feb 2015.
The Net: I think we do have a good groupings of WRs (Geremy Davis might be the best talent we've had in 10 years) and good four tandem of RBs (and the FR are looking good) and who knows about the TEs (but they look the part. Whitmer & Boyle? The point is that NONE of this looks good because you simply can't run a play in this level of College Football behind the existing line.
We are in this position in mid-October because of a choice that Diaco made as a strategist. And, certainly, with Patterson & Cummings & Foley on that staff, he had ample wise men advising him. We suck & they had to know this was possible. And, therefore, the insertion of Crozier & Rutherford early was absolutely part of the path. Oak is being lauded. And, kids that were recruited by the previous regime -that were found not playable - are not getting to the field. It is a raw group of guys and several are not getting passing grades.
Diaco came in and kept one existing coach - Mike Foley. His mentor had to be part of that conversation. Foley was the guy that created many raw Connecticut players into solid players over a half dozen years. For instance, in 2006 the stories of Will Beatty & Donald Thomas & Zach Hurd. Then Mo Petrus. Diaco doubled down with that by bringing his colleague Mike Cummings, who has the distinction of taking a really raw Eric Fisher at Central Michigan and turning him into the First Pick of the NFL Draft. I don't believe, collectively, that these guys looked at the roster and didn't know 2014 was going to be extremely challenging. (and to my eye, the one consistent kid (Gus Cruz) wasn't even supposed to play in February)
Recruiting in January? Rutherford was on board - a good pickup as he was desired by other bigger programs. But Crozier and Oak were classic late bloomers; kids from Florida that didn't make the first tier but played great their Senior years and earned the push. Could Diaco/Cummings et al bring in the whole group of JUCO and transfer kids - that are less evaluative risk (but maybe MORE character risk). Addazio has done this. Cincinnati has done this when needed. USF has repeatedly done this. I think Diaco - with a ND mindset - fought this path. They went with what was in the cupboard; and they damn sure are out hard trying to get OLine types in their class for Feb 2015.
The Net: I think we do have a good groupings of WRs (Geremy Davis might be the best talent we've had in 10 years) and good four tandem of RBs (and the FR are looking good) and who knows about the TEs (but they look the part. Whitmer & Boyle? The point is that NONE of this looks good because you simply can't run a play in this level of College Football behind the existing line.
We are in this position in mid-October because of a choice that Diaco made as a strategist. And, certainly, with Patterson & Cummings & Foley on that staff, he had ample wise men advising him. We suck & they had to know this was possible. And, therefore, the insertion of Crozier & Rutherford early was absolutely part of the path. Oak is being lauded. And, kids that were recruited by the previous regime -that were found not playable - are not getting to the field. It is a raw group of guys and several are not getting passing grades.