The View From Section 241 | Page 3 | The Boneyard

The View From Section 241

Status
Not open for further replies.
We need a new punt returner. When the guy isn't calling for fair catches with no one within 8 yards he's letting it bounce costing us tons of field position. I have never seen a PR let so many balls drop to the ground. It's become chronic.
 
A "dream season," where we are competing to be one of the ten? five? two? best teams in the country will require an entirely different roster than we have. It will require a roster that really no Big East team has had, save WVU with White and Slaton, since Miami and VPI left. It will require one that I don't think Steve Spurrier or Urban Meyer would be able to bring here to Connecticut in ten years of trying because of the systemic disadvantages, but whether you think they could or couldn't remains irrelevant to why we should be designing an offense around players we'd like to have but don't instead of players we have.

Louisville in 2006, USF in 2007, Cincinnati 2009 and Wannstedt's last couple of Pitt teams were very good and were competing at a very high level.

There is no reason that UConn can not be one of the top teams in the country in football. It takes the right players playing smart with the right scheme. There is so much talent out there in football. No one has a monopoly on it.
 
A couple of posts and then we can return to the When Urban Meyer is here we will ....

I never heard ANYONE say they were satisfied with the O, but to say it was not good means you were not watching the game. An O can not stay on the field as long as we did (and keep the opponent focused on watering their hands?) if it is not good. Is it where ANYONE wants it, no, but ball control was key to keeping an O that was averaging 500+ yards per game off the field. And ball control is really good for a D - nothing keeps them fresher then sitting back and watching the O chew up the clock.

Did JMac miss many open receivers? A year ago many of the posters on this board were pleading to see him on the field after watching him knock the sign off a pizza delivery car, and now we want him banished. I always thought the hype was exactly that, and would have preferred we turn over the reigns to one of the kids, but I can't stand here and say w/o him we would have a better record. Why would you sit him now? He's not ever going to be a great QB, but he is doing what is asked of him.

I am all in on the "go w/the 2 freshman at S" comment. JJ shows signs every game of developing in to a good player and then has an inevitable brain fart causing him to run a straight line on a play that ends up getting behind him and/or committing to a pass fake. The 2 kids have a nose for the ball and along w/Smallwood show a true knack for making the D an integral part of the O. JJ will simply get played like a novice at the poker table, inevitably falling for a fake.

Teams need confidence and winning is the ONLY thing that breeds confidence. Putting together a gameplan designed to WIN the game is the only thing that matters. You want style points, cheer on the Hawaii Rainbows. But if you think this is the same O as 10, then you're not watching and/or you're seeing what you want to see. It's not a finished product by far and it is never fun watching the sausage being made. But only here do we celebrate wins with calls for changes at QB.
 
If Boise can do it. If TCU can do it. If Utah can do it. If WVU can do it. If VCU can do it.

UCONN can do it.

Not likely, but it can be done.
There are schools where athletes actually go to class and there are schools where everybody is a Cam Newton. OK graduates 45% of their kids. At the SEC after Vandy grad rates are not great. We are over 80%. According to RE our admission standards may be some of the toughest. Boise in the 50's and TCU in the 60's. You have to find the right kid for our program. Can it be done - sure!!

PS Kudos to Miami - 75%.
 
Biz, keep up the good work on these. Thank you.

I said at the beginning of the season that I would be happy with a bowl....any bowl. We are still in the running for that and I think it is very important for the program that we keep up the string of bowl appearances. Especially with a young team like this that could use the extra practice time.

Sat. some things came together, especially on the defensive side of the ball. I am absolutely pumped about some of the pups - Smallwood, Jones, Brown. Very pleased to see these coaches put a defensive game plan in place that made sense for the opponent.

On offense I actually think the OL did their best job of the season with run blocking and McCombs had his best game by far. The pass blocking was scheme, some of Johny Mac not being able to read blitz or get rid of the ball and McCombs who is an absolute liability in pass protection. I think JJL has to get more time if only for that reason alone.

Not sure what to make of Nick Williams on returns. He clearly should have gotten to that ball that USF downed at the two. On the sideline Coach P gave him an ear full, so I am wondering if his days returning punts are numbered or if he is going to step up.

We can win three more games this season. It won't be easy and I will take them anyway we can get them....no matter how ugly.
 
Thanks for the write-up BL. Better than most of the reporters out there in terms of the details.

One play I noticed that I haven't seen get a lot of commentary was the 3rd and 2 play when JJL got the carry and absolutely barreled into the USF defenders making a loud thwack and falling forward for that first down. I just loved that physicality carrying the ball in a short yardage situation. Anyone else notice that play?
Yes - I wish he would get more carries.
 
.-.
I don't think that Jerome Junior has done anything to lose a starting job. But I do think that there's some competition coming up behind him taht's going to push him harder than he might be used to getting pushed recently, and that's a good thing, because that's what makes a team better. He was in positino to make some plays back there in pass coverage, and let a sure interception bounce off his pads late in teh game. The defense came right back and the line deflected a pass that landed in our LB's hands.

Junior has absolutely done things to lose the starting job. In the 2nd half last year, he appeared to be turning the corner, and had some big games. This year, he has gone back to his old ways. Missed tackles, blown coverage, and taking absolutely atrocious angles on the ball leading to huge gains. The starting safeties when BWW comes back should be Ty Meer Brown and Byron Jones. Both have great closing speed, and are making plays.
 
Recruiting is the lifeblood of any football program. Establishing a recruiting foothold as a northeast division 1-A football program destination of choice among the very best players coming into college, is the only thing, the ONLY thing this program has lacked when it comes to recruiting. That is changing.

And the beauty of it, is that you don't need the championships. You don't need the glitz and glamour and history. You need to be able to recruit players.

BUT - we've actually got it. We've been to teh BCS game. We've got the championship banners up there on the facade of the stadium. We've got the top notch facilities.

WHY?

The bottom line is that players choose to go somewhere, because they like the coaches.

That's what recruiting is all about. The facilities, the glitz, the glamour, the prestige, the conference affiliation, that's what gets the players through the front door easier.

The vast majority of palyers choose where they want to go because of the coaches and nothing else.

So far, given where they came from, how little time they had, and what they had to accomplish, I think this coaching staff has done a phenomenal job with everything they've done both on the field and off.

It's only going to get better, with a full year under their belt back in the saddle, and what everything the UConn football program brings to the table.

BTW - We kicked Spurrier's South Carolina's by the way.......and it wasn't that long ago when it happened.

and Pittsburgh right now, is in line for their whupping.


Carl,

You might find this an interesting read. The author refrences several studies on this subject

http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/lib/thesis/2009/2009destachet.pdf
 
That's a nice paper, and says exactly what I've been saying.

Recruiting is about players liking their coaches. #1 priority identified among wisconsin student athletes is that the school has the desired academic coursework and scholarship opportunity, and #2 is the head coach personality. After that is facilities and campus/social life.

These coaches we've got right now are just getting started on recruiting, and they know the landscape, and they're all-in on building this program.

Conference affiliation, all the other stuff, pretty even across the board, not so much.

thanks again, I'm going to make sure that paper gets into somebody's hands at uconn, if they're not already aware of it.
 
My point is that the way the game was played yesterday is identical to the way it has been every game since Orlovsky left save a riveting second half in 2009. My point is that while some years we may get a layup home/away schedule from the Big East and by default of 37 tie-breakers end up in the BCS, every year we're still vulnerable to teams like Temple, Western Michigan, Virginia, Iowa State, even at home. My point is not that we are not Oklahoma, just that there has not even been a glimpe or flash where I could honestly convince myself that we might be. Calhoun had his dream season four years after being hired. Auriemma had his after six. P has a chance to build towards his, unfortunatly he seems to be leaning toward the perpetual 8-4, 8-5 land of RandyBall.



This viewpoint is never popular on this site, but is more accurate than not. You used the word "vulnerable" and the UConn offense (save for the "riviting second half in 2009")has continously left the Huskies' "game outcomes "at risk" since the Dan O era ended.

I honestly felt that UConn had turned the corner during that "riviting second half in 2009". They suddenly found an offense and could put up TDs with the best of them. They won a OT shootout at Notre Dame. They almost knocked of BE Champ Cincy in a shootout on the road. They were exciting. Anyone forget the ending of the "Wintery Mix" Bowl against South Florida. The Bulls and the same QB (Daniels) we saw on Saturday had rallied to go ahead with little time left. But just for once, the confidence level in the ability of the offense to move the ball into FG range was almost palpable. I was supremely confident in that offense at that point . . . and that is almost never the case (still digusted over potential game winning drive against Virginia in Charlotteville in "07).

Point is that UConn appeared to have arrived and appeared to have unimaginable potential as far as what that program could become. And now . . . they are smack in the middle of huge uncertainty.
 
We need a new punt returner. When the guy isn't calling for fair catches with no one within 8 yards he's letting it bounce costing us tons of field position. I have never seen a PR let so many balls drop to the ground. It's become chronic.

No question. Our return teams, specifically Nick Williams have been a huge disappointment. Easy to blame blockers, but Williams has not looked good at all fielding kicks. Hesitant to catch the ball, and does not explode through the line.
 
After re-watching the game I like JJL carrying the ball and moving the pile. Better pass blocker. A better counter to the blitz would be JJL straight ahead. Keeps everybody honest.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,223
Messages
4,558,007
Members
10,442
Latest member
StatsMan


Top Bottom