The View From Section 241 | Page 2 | The Boneyard

The View From Section 241

Status
Not open for further replies.

CTMike

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
11,379
Reaction Score
40,602
Nice pic. And nice penguin suit! Any particular reason...?
The short answer is payback... for one of my buddy's bachelor parties, we went to a Sox game... and we dressed him up in pink Yankees gear. This weekend, it was my turn to be on the receiving end. :)
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
35,978
Reaction Score
33,462
Some sleep, picked up my son at GW (hung over and with not a clue where he left his contacts the night before -- parents are often made so proud) at about 9:45 and was in the parking lot setting up by 10:30 or so. Tailgate was good. College children are very appreciative of beer and real food. Lot was empty, and more fans wearing blue than red (to be fair, these are the cash lots -- obviously there were nearer lots all in red). Kudos to the young male alum from Trumbull parked next to me, who was with a jeepfull of attractive former cheerleader young alums. Good for him. (Note to self -- remember to bring much, much more extra food to road games in case this ever happens again).
This. Best writing on the Boneyard.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,854
Reaction Score
21,359
I said in another thread, and I'll repeat it here, that watching this game gave me the sense that UConn just made a decision that they were going to work on the run game. Almost like they didn't really have that much respect for Maryland and figured they would win so they were just using it to work on something that was not quite right last week. I'm sure if you ask Deleone he'll deny it, but if you watch the play calls it is hard to come to the conclusion that they were trying to work a well rouned offense...
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
2,236
Reaction Score
2,482
The short answer is payback... for one of my buddy's bachelor parties, we went to a Sox game... and we dressed him up in pink Yankees gear. This weekend, it was my turn to be on the receiving end. :)
you looked high up I thought penguins couldn't fly
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,661
Reaction Score
8,668
Biz good report. My son heard early Sat morn that Adam wasn't playing. He is one tough kid had 103 degree fever during the week and kept playing until he couldn't hide it anymore and was kept out by theteam doctor. Perhaps you couldn't see from the upper deck but they rotated Bullock in at center on 4 or 5 drives during the game. My opinion the line as a whole had a thier best game of the season although their is always room for improvement. Some thing else you didn't mention was that after JJ went out with an injury, Pruitt played a bunch at end when they went with 3 lineman.

From where I was sitting I had no problem following the game but I had trouble distinguishing some of the numbers on the uniforms. So I'm not surprised to find out I missed some.
 

Bill Sussman

My Name isn't really Bill
Joined
Nov 21, 2011
Messages
307
Reaction Score
852
That was a very, very strange game. We gained 240 yards of total offense. They gained 200. And we saw a 24-21 game, with only one return TD. How is that possible? I think the result was statistically absurd. But I know three things about what was a strange game. First, I didn't know sitting there that Masters was out and we as a team were suffering with the flu on what was a surprisingly hot day. But our heroes did what they had to do, spectacularly at times and just enough at the end, and got a win that was incredibly important to them personally and necessary for our season. Will power counts. Second, as opposed to the NC State game, we scored first and played from ahead, rather than behind, the whole game. I think that that did effect how both teams played. The way we are built this year, playing from ahead is going to be necessary for us to win. And, when we're ahead, we are not going to be playing dynamic offensive football. And shouldn't be worried about it. Third, that was the first time as a UConn football fan that I've ever had the same feeling I've had at times on the road as a hoops fan -- that this is not just another fanbase, but one that supports its team on the road and enthusiastically and makes me want to travel. More on this later, but compared to some of our showings in Piscataway and Morgantown, it was night and day.

Let's start with the trip and the feel of the place. Worked a full day on Friday, and but for some idiot driving off an enbankment on an exit ramp on the west end of the Cross Westchester, costing me 30 minutes by closing an exit ramp (please consider how your actions will effect me next time dude) had an uneventful drive down, checking in to a hotel in Alexandria, VA around 11:30. Hotel was deluged with gold and navy WVU fans waiting for the JMU game on Saturday. Now there is a fan base. Some sleep, picked up my son at GW (hung over and with not a clue where he left his contacts the night before -- parents are often made so proud) at about 9:45 and was in the parking lot setting up by 10:30 or so. Tailgate was good. College children are very appreciative of beer and real food. Lot was empty, and more fans wearing blue than red (to be fair, these are the cash lots -- obviously there were nearer lots all in red). Kudos to the young male alum from Trumbull parked next to me, who was with a jeepfull of attractive former cheerleader young alums. Good for him. (Note to self -- remember to bring much, much more extra food to road games in case this ever happens again). There were a lot of UConn fans there. Maybe, realistically, 2500 to 3000 or so. (As opposed to the 200 or 300 I've seen at other road games I've been.) Not only was the visitors section full, but in the center of the upper deck (where we were) there were as many UConn fans as Maryland fans. Equal enough that it reminded me of sitting mixed with MD fans in the outer reaches of the Carrier Dome during the 2002 Eastern Regionals at Syracuse. And the UConn fans weren't there just to curse Edsall. Everyone was into the game, cheering and making their presence known to the players on the field. The Maryland fans, by the way, were incredibly nice. Far nicer than the two games I went to in Piscataway, and far nicer, frankly, than I think we treat visiting fans at the Rent. The closest I saw to fan tension at any point was when MD fans started fighting over "Redskins vs. Ravens." Like Yankee -- Red Sox fights breaking out at the Rent. The campus was very physically attractive -- I do think nicer looking than UConn -- and is only 10 miles or so from downtown DC. The day was much, much, hotter than either of our home games. Everyone in my party was caught unprepared and burned to a crisp. It was low 90s where we were sitting, fairly high up. I can't believe it wasn't hotter in the stadium itself, and that had to play a role in the game. Easy drive home after, and with a stop for dinner was home by 11:30.

Special teams first. Christen kicked well, despite missing a 48 yarder. Wagner was really good, again. Nick Williams, in the return game, made the single biggest play of the game, as it had us playing ahead the entire game. The kick coverages, however, were not what they should be and need to be. Yes, I recognize that Diggs is going to be a special player, but we made it too easy on him. Kinney had a chance to take his head off on a punt he should have fair caught and didn't, leading to a long return. Deshonn Foxx refused to stay outside, and let Diggs get outside him on a kickoff without making a move on him. The coverages need to get better quickly. The good news is that the miscues look to be more physical than mental. I don't know what Brandon Steg did to extend their second TD drive. But if he actually did anything (because nothing was said ever on the field), he needs to not do it again.

A very, very strange day for the Defense. On the one hand, they only gave up 200 yards total offense, and had tons of sacks and tackles for losses, and did it on a day without Blidi, without Joseph at the end and with many of them fighting the flu in unseasonably warm weather. I'd like to do nothing but sing their praises. However, I know we play a gambling, aggressive defense but you can't allow a team to score 21 points on reasonably long drives when you only give up 200 yards total. You need more consistency. A lot of individuals were great. Sio, Yawin, Ryan Wirth and Gratz come to mind. We played 5 DTs to keep people fresh. I didn't see a sub DE come in until Jesse Joseph got hurt, and then I think Willman finished the game. Taylor Mack did not look outmatched generally, but was victimized for the second straight week, and had a late hit flag to boot. Tymeer Brown made a bad play on one of their TD drives, going for a ball on third and long instead of letting the receiver catch it and stopping him short of a first down. Overall, I guess, I think giving up the 21 points was not a good result, but the number of plays the D made didn't make me lose my faith in what they can accomplish this season. Now, if Blidi's injury was a hammy, and he wanted to play, hopefully that isn't long term. And it was nice seeing Stephen back on the field, although I don't think he played a lot. But the loss of Joseph, if that occurs, on top of the loss of Jennings, would leave us in a pickle. If you still have Trevardo, backed up by Norris, you now need some combo of Willman, Louis, Maybe McBridge moving back to DE, maybe a Donohue or Vann lining up there to rush the passer, something, at SSDE, which may be the key position to a college defense. One other thing to consider -- Joseph was a "true" Sr. who never took a redshirt. I think 3 games is one to many to play and then take a medical redshirt, but I'm not sure of that.

On offense, I know we only had 240 yards (again) but I saw a lot of positives there as well. Whitmer showing a willingness to tuck it in and run. McCombs, McCummings and the run blocking looking much more like last year than the last two weeks. Leaving the wildcat in for a few plays at a time. We didn't throw as much, in part because we were up the whole game and were trying to make their offense beat us, but good efforts by Delahunt and by Michael Smith. And turnovers and penalties were limited. Whitmer missed a throw or two he could have made, but you'll trade that for eliminating the picks. (Or, more accurately, you should be willing to trade that). And, most importantly, I think it's only fair to remember we won the game, never trailed and were up two scores as much as we were up only one. If it got conservative, it got conservative for a reason. Having said that, Mateas needs to be much, much more consistent snapping the ball in shotgun. I think that is a material part of our problems offensively, and wouldn't be surprised if we see Bullock get a shot there before we start conference play.

So we're 2-1. That is where we probably should be at this point. Yes, we could be 1-2 or 3-0, but we've neither proved that this is a great year or couldn't be a really good year. We now need to stop the WMU passing attack and get revenge in Kalamazoo. And remember that we moved the ball against them last year, so it would be a good week to get the offense moving a bit more. Win there, take care of business at home against an unmatched Buffalo, and then let's see what the Big East play will bring.

Can't argue with much in your post but I figured I would try. I grew up in the Atlanta area and took a drive up and down the east coast visiting countless colleges - UNC, Duke, UPenn, St. Josephs, Manhattan, Davidson, Richmond, Loyola to name a few - and I would put UConn's campus up against Maryland's any day (Richmond is definitely tops). Different strokes for different folks I guess though.....
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
8,269
Reaction Score
17,592
A very, very strange day for the Defense. . . . I know we play a gambling, aggressive defense but you can't allow a team to score 21 points on reasonably long drives when you only give up 200 yards total. You need more consistency.

I'm puzzled by this comment. The first drive was reasonably long. The second was over -- the defense had gotten the stop in Maryland territory -- and the penalty on the punt extended it. They then scored on a freak tip play on third and long. The third drive covered all of 53 yards after Diggs' long KO return.

Maryland was starting to eat up some yards in the second half, particularly when they abandoned the run in between the tackles in favor of more stretch runs. They had some success doing that and that has me a little bit concerned. But to criticize for allowing Maryland to score on long sustained drives just doesn't match what actually happened on the field.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
8,269
Reaction Score
17,592
Can't argue with much in your post but I figured I would try. I grew up in the Atlanta area and took a drive up and down the east coast visiting countless colleges - UNC, Duke, UPenn, St. Josephs, Manhattan, Davidson, Richmond, Loyola to name a few - and I would put UConn's campus up against Maryland's any day (Richmond is definitely tops). Different strokes for different folks I guess though.....

I wasn't a fan of the campus, either. It just seemed to lack an identity. It's not rural, it's not urban. It just seemed kind of sterile. UConn has done a much better job making their new buildings look like the old ones, and matching it with renovations to older buildings. Every campus has their 1950's and 60's architectural eyesores, and MD was no different.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
2,044
Reaction Score
1,870
I'm puzzled by this comment. The first drive was reasonably long. The second was over -- the defense had gotten the stop in Maryland territory -- and the penalty on the punt extended it. They then scored on a freak tip play on third and long. The third drive covered all of 53 yards after Diggs' long KO return.

Maryland was starting to eat up some yards in the second half, particularly when they abandoned the run in between the tackles in favor of more stretch runs. They had some success doing that and that has me a little bit concerned. But to criticize for allowing Maryland to score on long sustained drives just doesn't match what actually happened on the field.

Don't forget too, that I'm pretty sure the first drive was extended by a penalty as well. IIRC we had them stopped around the 35-40 and a 15 yard penalty gave them the first in our half of the field. Our defense held up well all game, but if you give the offense enough opportunities they'll eventually get the ball with a short field or benefit from a penalty or something, and that's pretty much how all of UMD's scoring came about.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
22,817
Reaction Score
9,456
How did the safeties perform, did they have a strong game?

Linebackers were a terror, so there wasn't much for the safeties to do, but truthfully, I don't think they had a great game - they can get better.

If #5 isn't going to be on the field on D, offenses are going to continually take long shots down the field at Mack, b/c god bless the kid, he plays like a maniac and I love him, but he's not going to out jump a lot of big receivers for a ball in single coverage. and with Gratz playing shut down on the other side,

that's the way it's going to be....and had the Maryland QB been on target on one deep throw, they may have duplicated the TD play that NC State beat us with their only TD last week, except without needing the incredibly athletic play of the WR.

Mack and the safety were talking a bit after that play, he wasn't stride for stride with that receiver, and looked to me like he was expecting help over the top that didn't get there. (he was in single coverage vs. NC State and the receiver simply laid out and made an incredibly athletic catch)

One on of the other Maryland scoring plays, I don't know who missed the assignment, but there was a major breakdown in the spacing and leverage on D on one of the Jory dove inside his blocker, and got sealed to the outside, and there was nobody left to make a tackle.

I don't know if it was a safety, or Johnson, or the DE, or corner or what, or if multiple people didn't get their fit, but that field shouldn't have opened up that way.
I'll get a chance to rewatch tonight, but I don't recall if we brought a blitz on that play or not, or who it was coming from, but even it we did blitz a safety, that TD happened b/c our defense ducked it up.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
701
Reaction Score
1,000
Thanks for the writeup biz.. Gives me a good idea on what happened that reading the boxscore just doesn't communicate...
 

RioDog

Block C Bozo
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
1,669
Reaction Score
4,684
Thanks for the writeup biz.. Gives me a good idea on what happened that reading the boxscore just doesn't communicate...
+1
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
4,455
Reaction Score
7,874
Maryland was starting to eat up some yards in the second half, particularly when they abandoned the run in between the tackles in favor of more stretch runs. They had some success doing that and that has me a little bit concerned. But to criticize for allowing Maryland to score on long sustained drives just doesn't match what actually happened on the field.

Thats why I was curious about saftey play, they (SS) not forcing inside or were they getting sealed?
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
22,817
Reaction Score
9,456
Thats why I was curious about saftey play, they (SS) not forcing inside or were they getting sealed?

Things never as good as they seem, never as bad as they seem. It was probably a calculated risk, the Coach Brown took, because we sent people at their QB all day long, but I do think the back side of the defense was exposed a bit, because what we're doing sending players on blitzes and was forcing the safeties to cover the entire field, and we had a nickel package and what looked like a classic 3-3-5 stack going for a while. It's just room to improve. The inside backers and DT's were loading up and shooting the A gaps all day. Maryland tried to string the ball out to stretch the D out, and it worked a bit.

I hate to use the zebras in a discussion about a game, but without the zebras, Maryland doesn't score a lot of their points. We got hosed on something that I haven't seen yet on video at the end of the third quarter, giving possession back to Maryland, and the long TD was a BS call - clearly offensive pass interference, I though Coach Brown was going to kick the referee's ass.
 

IMind

Wildly Inaccurate
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,868
Reaction Score
2,616
I hate to use the zebras in a discussion about a game, but without the zebras, Maryland doesn't score a lot of their points. We got hosed on something that I haven't seen yet on video at the end of the third quarter, giving possession back to Maryland, and the long TD was a BS call - clearly offensive pass interference, I though Coach Brown was going to kick the referee's ass.

Don't you just love our "Big East" officials...
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
2,793
Reaction Score
4,904
I thought the S play was very good. Adams continues to show why he will be starter next year, with Jones sliding over to CB. Have we seen one Jerome Junior, oops, someone got by me with my flat angle or biting on a fake this year? One Harris Agbor, what the heck was that running past me moment? And this from kids who are still learning the position. Can you pick out a play where they could have done more, sure. But the play back there has been solid. Let's be honest - no one is going to win against our front 7 so they should be trying more over the top stuff, and yet the S play has been stout.

So, what do we expect to see this week from DB - 3-4 or 3-3-5?
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
8,269
Reaction Score
17,592
Things never as good as they seem, never as bad as they seem. It was probably a calculated risk, the Coach Brown took, because we sent people at their QB all day long, but I do think the back side of the defense was exposed a bit, because what we're doing sending players on blitzes and was forcing the safeties to cover the entire field, and we had a nickel package and what looked like a classic 3-3-5 stack going for a while. It's just room to improve. The inside backers and DT's were loading up and shooting the A gaps all day. Maryland tried to string the ball out to stretch the D out, and it worked a bit.

You can catch videos of the scoring plays here. I just watched the Wes Brown TD in the first half. We were lined up with 4 down, and either sent a safety on a blitz or the safety just cheated on the receiver swinging around (like a Delaware Wing-T -- they did a lot of that, particularly in the second half). They didn't block the DE so that the guards could take on the ILB's. The two inside backers each got sealed, and Adams got sucked in (really not sure where he thought the play was going. Well executed play compounded by one (maybe two) bad mistakes from the safeties.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
204
Reaction Score
272
Biz, great as always, but you omitted maybe our biggest play(er).

Our AD was on the sideline rah rahing in players faces, and giving helmet slaps.
I know he had at least one flash back!
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
187
Reaction Score
296
Mack and the safety were talking a bit after that play, he wasn't stride for stride with that receiver, and looked to me like he was expecting help over the top that didn't get there. (he was in single coverage vs. NC State and the receiver simply laid out and made an incredibly athletic catch)

Watching it live, I thought that it was single coverage vs NC St also, but Ty-Meer Brown said different after the game. Coulda been protecting his buddy, I suppose.

http://articles.courant.com/2012-09..._1_geremy-davis-taylor-mack-blidi-wreh-wilson
UConn's defense was really good except for the 46-yard touchdown pass from Mike Glennon (15 of 30, 204 yards, 1 TD, six sacks) into the hands of receiver Bryan Underwood. Underwood blew past cornerback Taylor Mack, filling in for dehydrated starter and All-Big East performer Blidi Wreh-Wilson. But Brown said Mack should have had some safety help on the play.
"I should have been over the top a little bit sooner than I was," Brown said. "The quarterback was looking that way so I should have weaved over, been over the top to make the tackle, at least."
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,518
Reaction Score
3,737
Don't you just love our "Big East" officials...

Speaking of officials ... did anyone else think that the WR screen attempt that SM3 batted down was a lateral??? Looked to me like it should not have been blown dead so quickly.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
22,817
Reaction Score
9,456
That defensive formation against NC State was a middle field closed single deep safety. Tymeer should have known that the pressure up front showing was going to drop out to just a 4 man rush and go to what they did underneath with the backers, and the Y slot was picked up coming off the line of scrimmage on the seam/post, and Mack and Gratz were in single coverage. that single deep safety (Ty Meer) did a poor job of diagnosing and was 10 yards away, and when the receiver was full extension with his arms to make the grab, he should have been there to easily to crack him in the jaw and knock it loose. Should he have been there to help? Yes. NC State QB was looking for that throw the whole time. Was it single coverage for Mack - yes. The CB in that formation, knows he's on an island, and not to expect the safety, and that CB will play it differently, in that situation than they would in a different coverage shell, when they do expect the safety.

I don't know if the play I mentioned before against Maryland - was the same defensive formation - exact same thing - I haven't watched the recording yet. I seem to remember a different kind of coverage shell involving the safeties, and as I said, in that situation the CB - Mack - would be expecting the help over the top, and played the coverage differently than he did against NC State. I think that when they were talking on the field after that, that's exactly what they were talking about.

It's just my impression from what I saw - I could be wrong about what happened against Maryland - I'm not wrong about NC State.

Our defense is playing great, but we've got lots of room to improve, we need better play diagnosis out of the safety position. A certain style of offense that we haven't faced yet this year, is going to give us trouble, and the ability of the safeties to diagnose a play and get to the ball will be key.

Teddy Bridgewater is completing 80% of his passes so far this year, there's a reason for it.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
22,817
Reaction Score
9,456
and by the way, against NC State, if trevardo williams is a split second faster, and gets that extra inch, that ball from the NC State QB never crosses the line of scrimmage in the air.

Our defensive line play has been stellar. I expect that when I look at this game again tonight, I'll see more of the same from the front line.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
254
Reaction Score
88
Good, accurate write-up. About the only thing I don't agree with was the campus. I thought UConn is newer and has a better atmosphere with more kids walking around. Even at night everything seemed on lockdown - we had to go through checkpoints to go from the east side/Metro station back to the Marriott.

Crowd looked to be about 3-4k. For those of you in section 2 chances are you were in the post-TD crowd shots. I spotted me and my friend and took a nice screenshot. We were in row U. Crowd was loud and into the game all the way till the end. The replay caught a nice, loud version of a UConn-Huskies-woof chant and the Go Huskies chant and part of the U-C-O-N-N.

I ended up going to DC Saturday night and the green line was an easy 20 min ride into downtown with free parking by the College Park metro station. Subways ran till 3AM so we stayed out late and had a good time.

SNY messed up at the end of the 3rd quarter only because the referees messed up with that phantom facemask call. I read somewhere that Coach P submitted the calls to the league for review.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
245
Guests online
1,671
Total visitors
1,916

Forum statistics

Threads
159,605
Messages
4,197,614
Members
10,065
Latest member
Rjja


.
Top Bottom