The View From Section 241 — Buffalo | The Boneyard
.

The View From Section 241 — Buffalo

Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
23,246
Reaction Score
13,933
So if you logged on to the app at 3:30 looking for us to play a much more complete game, and dominate a middling G-5 team, you logged off disappointed. If you wanted to watch an entertaining football game, you logged off disappointed. Other than the last five minutes there was no entertainment value whatsoever. (And extra credit in that regard to the home — I can’t call it a “crowd”, maybe an “audience?” I hope my funeral one day has more juice in it than yesterday’s game.). But a team that had improbably grabbed defeat from the jaws of victory in consecutive weeks on the road gutted out a boring, middling effort on the road and came out with a win. And to be truthful, if that happens twice more in our remaining G-5 road games, this season will end up o.k. So take the victory and move on.

Let’s start with special teams this week. Hats off to Freeman, who for the second time in a month made a FG at the death that we desperately needed, but I hope the special teams coaches take a hard look in the mirror this week because on specials we were caught with our pants down twice. The semi-blocked punt and their successful fake FG should not happen. It’s not enough that we fixed our long snapping problem and want talent to take over. And while the fake FG punt accomplished what we wanted there, and put for their guys 65 yard punt might have set us up for a FG that would have put us up 10, I don’t get it. I would have let Freeman try to put us up 10, and if we were going to punt don’t get why we didn’t let our punter do it, which one would think would have been less risky.

Defense statistically had a better game — both total yardage and points were way down — but Buffalo’s offense isn’t good and was banged up, so while they gave us a chance to win I’m not sure how much improvement was shown. If we didn’t miss tackles on their long, early TD run I could say that we kept everything in front of us all day, and made sure that we weren’t going to beat ourselves on D, but that one play did occur, and it was just handing them 7 points out of nowhere. I’d love to see a dominant performance at home next week to give the D some momentum going into the off week and the trip to Chestnut Hill, but we’ll have to see it to believe it,

The offense did not have a good day. Look, credit needs to be given for playing mistake free. No penalties for a game, and no turnovers in 5, are both fairly remarkable accomplishments. For the players and the staff. But we need a secondary WR to step up big time, presumably either Neider or Porter, we need much better play in the passing game from Honig and Harris, and we need a secondary TB to emerge. Again, I’m more and more puzzled at the failure to give Rosa carries on a day when Edwards was out for a while. A TB who succeeded 3 years ago, and looked to be an emerging star, has 2 carries for 10 yards and then no more carries. Would someone please explain? But yesterday, for 80% of the snaps, we looked conservative but competent, and then once every five plays or so we would run a play that had no chance of going anywhere. Totally blown assignments? Their DC having the right schemes and keys to stop the plays we called — said another way, being totally outcoached? Don’t know. But just no explosiveness in the offense when are two weapons are contained by injury or scheme. And last point — we had major success with JF running the ball. If teams are giving us that, please continue to do it until the other team takes a DB off Bell to make sure JF is contained.

So that’s it. Just like our performance this week’s 241 will just do enough, and not be anything that anyone will treasure or remember. Let’s get to 4-2 next week in a game we’ll be comfortable favorites at home. Let’s hopefully look somewhat better in doing it. And then let’s take our week off and figure out what this season can still look like.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Biz.

We did what we had to do to win, including a last minute drive to get within FG range.

This team has yet to play anything near a complete game and should have won at Cuse and at Delaware. There is much to improve, but getting on a run is not out of the question with this schedule with a 7-8 win season and a bowl still on the table.

Circle BC. They're a better team, but we will be heading into Alumni of a bye week and by then their season may be pretty much over. I also think we have a chance against Duke at home.
 
If our late game defense didn't have constant breakdowns we'd probably be 5-0 today. It's a real problem that they can't get a meaningful stop at game's end. Even yesterday and the Ball State game they couldn't get a game-clinching stop. Not sure whether it's scheme or personnel but it's become an ugly trend in 4 straight games. Poor tackling and lack of forcing turnovers has been a big part of it.
 
So if you logged on to the app at 3:30 looking for us to play a much more complete game, and dominate a middling G-5 team, you logged off disappointed. If you wanted to watch an entertaining football game, you logged off disappointed. Other than the last five minutes there was no entertainment value whatsoever. (And extra credit in that regard to the home — I can’t call it a “crowd”, maybe an “audience?” I hope my funeral one day has more juice in it than yesterday’s game.). But a team that had improbably grabbed defeat from the jaws of victory in consecutive weeks on the road gutted out a boring, middling effort on the road and came out with a win. And to be truthful, if that happens twice more in our remaining G-5 road games, this season will end up o.k. So take the victory and move on.

Let’s start with special teams this week. Hats off to Freeman, who for the second time in a month made a FG at the death that we desperately needed, but I hope the special teams coaches take a hard look in the mirror this week because on specials we were caught with our pants down twice. The semi-blocked punt and their successful fake FG should not happen. It’s not enough that we fixed our long snapping problem and want talent to take over. And while the fake FG punt accomplished what we wanted there, and put for their guys 65 yard punt might have set us up for a FG that would have put us up 10, I don’t get it. I would have let Freeman try to put us up 10, and if we were going to punt don’t get why we didn’t let our punter do it, which one would think would have been less risky.

Defense statistically had a better game — both total yardage and points were way down — but Buffalo’s offense isn’t good and was banged up, so while they gave us a chance to win I’m not sure how much improvement was shown. If we didn’t miss tackles on their long, early TD run I could say that we kept everything in front of us all day, and made sure that we weren’t going to beat ourselves on D, but that one play did occur, and it was just handing them 7 points out of nowhere. I’d love to see a dominant performance at home next week to give the D some momentum going into the off week and the trip to Chestnut Hill, but we’ll have to see it to believe it,

The offense did not have a good day. Look, credit needs to be given for playing mistake free. No penalties for a game, and no turnovers in 5, are both fairly remarkable accomplishments. For the players and the staff. But we need a secondary WR to step up big time, presumably either Neider or Porter, we need much better play in the passing game from Honig and Harris, and we need a secondary TB to emerge. Again, I’m more and more puzzled at the failure to give Rosa carries on a day when Edwards was out for a while. A TB who succeeded 3 years ago, and looked to be an emerging star, has 2 carries for 10 yards and then no more carries. Would someone please explain? But yesterday, for 80% of the snaps, we looked conservative but competent, and then once every five plays or so we would run a play that had no chance of going anywhere. Totally blown assignments? Their DC having the right schemes and keys to stop the plays we called — said another way, being totally outcoached? Don’t know. But just no explosiveness in the offense when are two weapons are contained by injury or scheme. And last point — we had major success with JF running the ball. If teams are giving us that, please continue to do it until the other team takes a DB off Bell to make sure JF is contained.

So that’s it. Just like our performance this week’s 241 will just do enough, and not be anything that anyone will treasure or remember. Let’s get to 4-2 next week in a game we’ll be comfortable favorites at home. Let’s hopefully look somewhat better in doing it. And then let’s take our week off and figure out what this season can still look like.
Good write-up. The last three seasons it seems Rosa did not change but the RB coach did. His touches display an unexplainable downward trajectory when looking at results. Edwards is a good back but thus far the approach has failed this year against weak competition. Especially in the red zone. And here we with TV not relaxing and effortlessly accessing TV for away games, but searching for streaming and paying subscriptions for little entertainment value. A very short sighted approach to build a program and increase the fanbase. A quick small buck perhaps somehow but suicidal from a brand and long term business perspective, since we are not an established performer that streaming is built on. True it’s not even our tv contract but it’s our exposure so we need to own the results.
 
Last edited:
Good write-up. The last two seasons it seems Rosa did not change but the RB coach did. And here we are on TV not relaxing to access games but searching for streaming and paying subscriptions for little entertainment value. A very short sighted approach to build a program and increase the fanbase. A quick small buck perhaps but suicidal from a brand and long term business perspective, since we are not an established performer that streaming is built on.
Sigh - ESPN+ had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with UConn on this day - home team controls the TV rights. Did you try to tune in at 11:11?
 
Good write-up. The last three seasons it seems Rosa did not change but the RB coach did. His touches display an unexplainable downward trajectory when looking at results. Edwards is a good back but thus far the approach has failed this year against weak competition. Especially in the red zone. And here we are on TV not relaxing to access away games but searching for streaming and paying subscriptions for little entertainment value. A very short sighted approach to build a program and increase the fanbase. A quick small buck perhaps but suicidal from a brand and long term business perspective, since we are not an established performer that streaming is built on.

What?

The RB coach doesn't call plays. Rosa fumbles and runs into his blockers. UConn was the visiting team. MAC has a contract with ESPN and we don't.
 
Was Murphy hurt? I thought he was emerging as a #2

Porter and TEs being under-used too.

JF only seems to want Bell. Very predictable to game plan even when we aren’t running it.

And if he didn't target Bell you would be wondering out loud why he didn't try to get the ball to our best playmaker.
 
If JF took the yards that were there in the Syracuse and Delaware games like yesterday we would have iced both games and be undefeated. Just inexplicable.

Will someone tell me, with the wealth of TE's on this roster, why stone hands Honig is the receiver of choice in the 4th quarter of tight games? Hansen was an immerging star last year and looked like a weapon for this year. Instead he is getting the Rosa treatment. All he does is catch the football. I can remember one missed ball that was more of a JF misdirection misfire
 
If our late game defense didn't have constant breakdowns we'd probably be 5-0 today. It's a real problem that they can't get a meaningful stop at game's end. Even yesterday and the Ball State game they couldn't get a game-clinching stop. Not sure whether it's scheme or personnel but it's become an ugly trend in 4 straight games. Poor tackling and lack of forcing turnovers has been a big part of it.
We really under appreciated our defensive linemen last season. They stuff up the middle, pressured the QB and occupied blockers, so guys on the edge and DB’s could make plays.
 
And here we are on TV not relaxing to access away games but searching for streaming and paying subscriptions for little entertainment value. A very short sighted approach to build a program and increase the fanbase. A quick small buck perhaps but suicidal from a brand and long term business perspective, since we are not an established performer that streaming is built on.
After your 11:11 debacle, you might want to restrain from sharing your views on media strategy.
 
Sigh - ESPN+ had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with UConn on this day - home team controls the TV rights. Did you try to tune in at 11:11?
Per UConn’s website, please explain? It was indeed on ESPN +. And your mindless posts ignores the point you control who you schedule and you evaluate all facets including how they televise. The same clueless posters as usual who can’t see the big picture and the business end. Or even the concept that people live in of other time zones.
IMG_1620.jpeg
 
Last edited:
What?

The RB coach doesn't call plays. Rosa fumbles and runs into his blockers. UConn was the visiting team. MAC has a contract with ESPN and we don't.
Again we mutually agree to schedule a game, and the reality is with their lower tier league ESPN contract, the expected result is ESPN+ on a 3:30pm Saturday game. Do you ever see the next step?
 
Chief, Chief, Chief,

Our home games are on CBS Sports. The MAC has a media deal with ESPN who decides where to put games. As an independent we need to schedule teams that we can schedule. And we want multi-year deals, home-home, regional if possible. Syracuse was on the ACC Digital platform. Should we not have played them?
 
Chief, Chief, Chief,

Our home games are on CBS Sports. The MAC has a media deal with ESPN who decides where to put games. As an independent we need to schedule teams that we can schedule. And we want multi-year deals, home-home, regional if possible. Syracuse was on the ACC Digital platform. Should we not have played them?
I recognize all that from the start. I think it’s short sighted to schedule numerous games that are likely to be on streaming/web. That’s not how you built a brand and a fanbase. CBS Sports Network is fine for home games but you need to think more strategically than just home games. About 1/2 our games are away. The TV filter needs to be constructed in your scheduling process regardless what team holds the actual contract.
 
Last edited:
Sigh - ESPN+ had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with UConn on this day - home team controls the TV
It may be beyond your processing ability but ESPN + was UConn’s Football’s exposure platform yesterday for building the brand and program. That’s the key point, and not who holds the TV contract, which is known before hand and a 3:30pm game between UConn and Buffalo likely destination is ESPN+ with that contract not ESPN1 or ESPN2.
 

Online statistics

Members online
40
Guests online
1,934
Total visitors
1,974

Forum statistics

Threads
164,422
Messages
4,395,700
Members
10,209
Latest member
gemini*trvl


.
..
Top Bottom