Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="diggerfoot, post: 4736331, member: 1673"] I know that, but it does not automatically means she is the best coach among her peers (consider Staley v Mulkey, it’s not a given the former is a better coach, winning precisely one title each with two different transcendent talents). But even if we assume Reeves is automatically the best coach relative to her peers, that does not mean she is the best coach for every type of player, any more than Auriemma was the best coach for someone like Houston. It sure does appear that she is the best for a player that comes out of the UConn system though. Did Montgomery, as with Dangerfield, also perform best with Reeves? Did Fowles perform any better than with the Sky, or not? Other examples? That is the type of info I am hoping the WNBA experts can provide. I have a challenging follow up question in mind, but I hope I can have more info first. [/QUOTE]