The TV Deal: Syracuse and Pitt. | The Boneyard

The TV Deal: Syracuse and Pitt.

Status
Not open for further replies.

IMind

Wildly Inaccurate
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,868
Reaction Score
2,616
What's amazing to me is that Boeheim specifically mentioned the TV deal in his multiple interviews yesterday. That the reason Pitt and Syracuse left is that the Big East didn't accept ESPN's first offer TV deal. If they had Pitt and 'Cuse would still be in the conference. That to me just sounds crazy.... Did they really panic that much? Was the reason the contract got turned down because of the basketball schools? The next offers in would have to have been higher. It seems to me that the Big East was in a great position... I just can't believe this was ultimately the reason why they left.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,306
Reaction Score
5,274
Of course it wasn't. What did you want him to say -- that my administration decided to chase every last dollar instead of valuing history and long term partnerships with other schools?
 

IMind

Wildly Inaccurate
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
1,868
Reaction Score
2,616
To even use that as a reason seems insane. Why even bring it up... of course that could just be his distorted reading of the situation...
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
12,412
Reaction Score
19,865
Considering that Pitt was among the schools lobbying to NOT accept the tv deal...I think it is pretty much an excuse, not a reason. Syracuse and especially Pitt acted in a manner that makes Bill Leahy and GeneDeFillipo look like men of honor. Boehiem was sent out there to justify it.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,429
Reaction Score
18,087
I agree, hes not gonna make his school look bad, he isnt going to tell the real reason that its all about money and what not
 

nelsonmuntz

Point Center
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
44,143
Reaction Score
32,984
Why would Pitt and Syracuse have stuck around a league that had a deal paying them $3MM/year less than they would make in the ACC, but they wouldn't stick around a league that had the potential to easily beat the ACC deal?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
723
Guests online
4,571
Total visitors
5,294

Forum statistics

Threads
157,023
Messages
4,077,444
Members
9,967
Latest member
UChuskman


Top Bottom