He didn’t want Oriakhi picking up a quick foul.Olander starting really is sort of fascinating. He didn't play a ton of minutes but for whatever reason starting him was exactly the right thing to do. Sometimes the "feel" of the game in basketball is overlooked these days, but whatever indescribable thing that is Calhoun had it and then some.
Does it have to be a positive decision? I think not covering Laettner on the inbounds pass in '90 was his singlemost worst decision. Cost us a FF. Took nine years to get back there.
Granted, it's likely UConn would've been steamrolled by UNLV, or maybe even Arkansas, but it's a FF we didn't get and Duke did.
I still love how he did that EXCEPT for the very last play of the game. After El-Amin’s final free throw, he directed Moore to blanket Willam Avery so Langdon was forced to bring the ball up the court.Letting Moore defend Langdon 1 v 1
Having Rash Jones defending in the closing seconds 1999 Final. We lose that game, history looks a lot different.I still love how he did that EXCEPT for the very last play of the game. After El-Amin’s final free throw, he directed Moore to blanket Willam Avery so Langdon was forced to bring the ball up the court.
All I remember about Olander was "hands of stone". Didn't he go on to play pro baseball?Au Contraire, I think it’s his decision to start Olander on 2011 NCAAT team on every game! It paid off handsomely and he either got the first bucket, rebound or foul. to this day, he still got two rings to prove it, which I may happily add, it’s twice as many as JB or Izzo has in their long coaching career!
Disagree. We were a short team to begin with and Burrell had fouled out. All we had for a big was Sellers playing on one leg. Duke's Plan A was to throw a lob down low to a virtually unguarded Abdelnaby. That sure dunk was taken away by dropping DePriest back. And he still made Laettner double-clutch for the Plan B.Does it have to be a positive decision? I think not covering Laettner on the inbounds pass in '90 was his singlemost worst decision. Cost us a FF. Took nine years to get back there.
Granted, it's likely UConn would've been steamrolled by UNLV, or maybe even Arkansas, but it's a FF we didn't get and Duke did.
I can only do the last 4 or so minutes.I think I am going to watch a replay since you brought it up.
It also needed a timely FT make, which would've made the point moot.UConn didn't need defense against Florida, it needed scoring.
So you're on Team FAU for all the marbles, eh?Disagree. We were a short team to begin with and Burrell had fouled out. All we had for a big was Sellers playing on one leg. Duke's Plan A was to throw a lob down low to a virtually unguarded Abdelnaby. That sure dunk was taken away by dropping DePriest back. And he still made Laettner double-clutch for the Plan B.
I don't even think we get steamrolled going forward. We were bringing asymmetrical warfare.
Start, freshman, Tyler Olander I might add.Au Contraire, I think it’s his decision to start Olander on 2011 NCAAT team on every game! It paid off handsomely and he either got the first bucket, rebound or foul. to this day, he still got two rings to prove it, which I may happily add, it’s twice as many as JB or Izzo has in their long coaching career!
Ifs are what make sports amazingly fun and frustrating. Ifs make the boneyard and other forums what they are. Think of all the Final 4s UConn would have been in if all the ifs benefited UConn. UConn has its fair share of heartbreaking ifs.If Rashad Anderson's 3 at the 3-minute mark (down 8) rattled out, or Reddick's 3 was 6 inches longer, it would have been a disastrous move to handcuff ourselves with Okafor on the bench.
I think as a single play in game that was it.Does it have to be a positive decision? I think not covering Laettner on the inbounds pass in '90 was his singlemost worst decision. Cost us a FF. Took nine years to get back there.
Granted, it's likely UConn would've been steamrolled by UNLV, or maybe even Arkansas, but it's a FF we didn't get and Duke did.
I hated the move but we stayed in striking distance and refs gave him a fair whistle second half. I think there's a decent chance we would've blown that game open if he kept him in.Basketball is a game of detail and Calhoun has made 1000s of decisions in his career and 100s of very important ones with tightly contested high stakes games hanging in the balance in the closing minutes.
But if you can pick just one decision to reference, one for fans to hang their hat on, what is it?
For me, point blank, the #1 Calhoun call of all time, and perhaps one of the best moves any baskeball coach has ever made is....
Sitting Okafor with 2 fouls vs Duke in the 2004 national semi-finals.
Many coaches might take the gamble and try to get him back out. I mean, he is a game changer after all, who wouldn't? But Calhoun stuck to his guns, yes It was a huge risk but it paid off as Okafor dominated the last quarter of the game or so. For me that one move is a microcosm of Calhoun as a person, he stubbornly sticks to what he believes in, most usually because he knows what the heck he is doing.
So BY, you get one pick and one pick only, what was Calhouns biggest in-game coaching decision of his career? (You have about 16500 minutes, give or take a hundred or so minutes, to pick from)
We always loved the bows. Brought some personality and fun to the games. They weren't taunting the other team so what were the complaints?Allowing Khalid to be JC's floor general while relaxing slightly his in game control. It allowed that team's player to have some fun during the game. I remember the big debate in this forum regarding the Rip and Kfree bowing in which some posters were strongly opposed to that behavior.
This was a big change way!
Board was split between it was helping team play looser and those who felt it was inappropriate behavior.We always loved the bows. Brought some personality and fun to the games. They weren't taunting the other team so what were the complaints?