cohenzone
Old Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 19,204
- Reaction Score
- 23,700
Some of the "expert" reasoning is questionable. Picking FL is totally reasonable. UConn has surprised and delighted me. I did I have them getting as far as the Eight but losing to MSU. Comparing this year's team to 99 is, IMHO, pretty far out there. That team, if it had a weakness, it was in post scoring, but not in post presence. The team had few big weaknesses and was probably the most mentally and maybe physically tough team we've ever had. Duke's superiority was blown out of proportion, especially as to UConn, by people who hadn't paid attention to just how good UConn was. To me, the 2011 team is a much closer comparison in terms of the likelihood of a big run by beating several more highly seeded teams, even though I thought UConn was better than a 7 seed.
I was away a lot this year, so didn't see the LVille massacre or either of the SMU games, but I guess my doubts about them springing several "upsets" was based on those games as well as how shaky they were in the loss to Stanford, one of the games I got to in person. The differences between our guys now and when we played UF early are several. Aside from Napier's pretty consistent high levels, RB has settled way down. Team D is way better. Giffey has become a good scoring option and at the moment, is rebounding pretty well. That, among other things has nailed Omar to the bench whereas he was seen early on as a key to success. Kromah has been a find on D and sometimes on O (except I don't like that I think he sometimes sees himself as scoring option 1) and Samuel fits in very well. At the moment, DD seems to be in an aggressive mode. Our two young posts are improving on D and on the boards, but that is where our weakest exploitable spot is. Tyler is not the worst option as an alternative if necessary. It'll be interesting to watch. Go Huskies.
I was away a lot this year, so didn't see the LVille massacre or either of the SMU games, but I guess my doubts about them springing several "upsets" was based on those games as well as how shaky they were in the loss to Stanford, one of the games I got to in person. The differences between our guys now and when we played UF early are several. Aside from Napier's pretty consistent high levels, RB has settled way down. Team D is way better. Giffey has become a good scoring option and at the moment, is rebounding pretty well. That, among other things has nailed Omar to the bench whereas he was seen early on as a key to success. Kromah has been a find on D and sometimes on O (except I don't like that I think he sometimes sees himself as scoring option 1) and Samuel fits in very well. At the moment, DD seems to be in an aggressive mode. Our two young posts are improving on D and on the boards, but that is where our weakest exploitable spot is. Tyler is not the worst option as an alternative if necessary. It'll be interesting to watch. Go Huskies.