alexrgct
RIP, Alex
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 10,091
- Reaction Score
- 15,648
in honor of Floyd Mayweather:
The sport of boxing (as well as MMA) speaks frequently of the concept of best "pound-for pound" fighter. "Pound-for-pound" ignores weight class and accounts for caliber of competition, proficiency, resiliency, power, etc. in other words, the fighter who's the most dominant within his own weight class than anyone else is in theirs, whose technical artistry is superior to that of any other, is the best pound-for-pound fighter.
When men's basketball-only fans are dismissive of the women's game, I like to raise the the "pound-for-pound argument" in defense of WCBB. Sure, women don't have the size and hops to contend with men. Meanwhile, the best middleweight fighter would get beaten decisively by even a mediocre heavyweight, and middleweights tend to own the current pound-pound title just the same. Similarly, I argue that I enjoy watching women compete in intra-gender fashion, and it may just be that Uconn's WCBB program is the best pound-for-pound college basketball program.
What I guess is up for discussion is whether everyone would agree. Do you think the boxing weight class analogy is apt when defending the women's game in basketball? Could a women's program be the pound-for-pound best at a point in time? What criteria do you think should be used to measure the top pound-for-pound program?
I'd be interested in reading others' thoughts on this.
The sport of boxing (as well as MMA) speaks frequently of the concept of best "pound-for pound" fighter. "Pound-for-pound" ignores weight class and accounts for caliber of competition, proficiency, resiliency, power, etc. in other words, the fighter who's the most dominant within his own weight class than anyone else is in theirs, whose technical artistry is superior to that of any other, is the best pound-for-pound fighter.
When men's basketball-only fans are dismissive of the women's game, I like to raise the the "pound-for-pound argument" in defense of WCBB. Sure, women don't have the size and hops to contend with men. Meanwhile, the best middleweight fighter would get beaten decisively by even a mediocre heavyweight, and middleweights tend to own the current pound-pound title just the same. Similarly, I argue that I enjoy watching women compete in intra-gender fashion, and it may just be that Uconn's WCBB program is the best pound-for-pound college basketball program.
What I guess is up for discussion is whether everyone would agree. Do you think the boxing weight class analogy is apt when defending the women's game in basketball? Could a women's program be the pound-for-pound best at a point in time? What criteria do you think should be used to measure the top pound-for-pound program?
I'd be interested in reading others' thoughts on this.