Totally uncalled for but not surprising coming from someone who has taken more victory laps than that Bolt dude.
Anything to make you feel better about yourself.
TBH, it seems like you attack @whaler11 to feel better about yourself.Totally uncalled for but not surprising coming from someone who has taken more victory laps than that Bolt dude.
Anything to make you feel better about yourself.
Help me understand why pointing out that shilling for this program isn't pathetic?
Try and make a coherent argument rather than just attacking me.
Matt has brought more to this board than you can even imagine. If he said one or 2 things that offended you or your butt buddy Wings then respond to him at the point of attack.
No need for a private attack thread that gave no substance or context. Feel free to post what he wrote that was so offensive.
As for Wings...you bring up a comment he made after the first year as why you agree with Whaler? Really....or did he say it this year?
By the way, the people who questioned whether Diaco wanted to win in his first year didn't have much of a clue what he was doing. The dumpster fire he inherited was so bad, it had to be broken down to ground zero. While he would love have to won every game, sacrifices had to be made in order to start over.
If you don't know why he did what he did in year one....nothing I can say. But I'm quite certain year one was the reason we went bowling in year 2. Year 3...no idea, except Diaco is a bad coach. No one could have known that after year 1, because it was not your typical year 1.
I don't agree with Matt on a lot of things, but he's at least someone who's covering the team consistently in some way. He fills a void that's been around the program, gets pretty close access, player interviews and stuff...some of the stuff is cool to see! There is a lack of questioning BD obviously, but who cares? Not everyone needs to be or is meant to be hounding the program
More than I can imagine? I can read his posts - so I'm pretty sure I see what he brings.
Wing is my butt buddy? Ignoring that's a fairly offensive term - he agrees with me at times and disagrees at others.
I tagged @UConn07 so I don't see how it's a private attack. He is more than welcome to defend himself.
You can defend Diaco's first year if you like. The hard truth is the program is in worse shape tonight than when he took over.
If you cared to read the recently bumped posts from after year 1 - you'd see that pretty much everyone knew he couldn't coach. He didn't need to reinvent the sport - his first year was no different than the first year 20 FBS coaches have every year.
Edit: and I've told @UConn07 a dozen times why I have no respect for him. Goes back to Towson and he still hasn't admitted that he called out the attendance from home and edited his blog.
It's hard to take him seriously when he's literally just a mouthpiece for the program.
It's hard to take him seriously when he's literally just a mouthpiece for the program.
he only gets that access though because he's a shill for the programSo all the interviews with players or the many times he broke the latest commit is just...what? A mouthpiece for the program?
I'm not going to play along with your manic games that fulfill your need to be better than everyone. If you think 20 FBS coaches walked into what Diaco did on any given year, you are either being obtuse, or you have no idea what went on behind the scenes when PP was here.
By the way, congrats on staying to the very end of the Tulane game. Impressive.
At the stage of where our program is, if people want to bring up nonsense about a writer in a thread that is posted only for the OP to get atta boys, I guess it's going to be a long off season.
Have at it. Give Whaler his strokes. He appreciates it.
I don't agree with Matt on a lot of things, but he's at least someone who's covering the team consistently in some way. He fills a void that's been around the program, gets pretty close access, player interviews and stuff...some of the stuff is cool to see! There is a lack of questioning BD obviously, but who cares? Not everyone needs to be or is meant to be hounding the program
So all the interviews with players or the many times he broke the latest commit is just...what? A mouthpiece for the program?
At the stage of where our program is, if people want to bring up nonsense about a writer in a thread that is posted only for the OP to get atta boys, I guess it's going to be a long off season.
Have at it. Give Whaler his strokes. He appreciates it.
Matt's interviews with commits tend to come after they've been broken elsewhere.
Whaler is indeed enjoying much of the attention the team's implosion has garnered him. I just stopped caring about the inconsistency a long time ago. It's a goshdarn message board. If people are going to stir the pot, let them do it. I could do without the hyperbole and drama queen-esque tone on the whole, but on this particular topic, it's pretty justified. Matt is so embedded in the infrastructure of the program he can't comprehend the alarm we fans feel.
There is no inconsistency. I want a functional football program that is worthy of support.
That some people can identify a fraud faster than others is just an artifact of having a terrible coach.
@UConn07 made the choice to put himself on the internet. When you do that and consistently post nonsense some people are going to call you out.
He chose to trade respect for his opinions for access. He'll look back in a few years and realize he was on the wrong side of that deal.
To be fair, Tulane (the 119th offense in the country) looked pretty advanced and productive against our defense too.In his Q&A he actually brags about attending every open practice and how advanced and productive the offense looked. LOL, when have you ever seen an offense NOT work well in practice. Must have really been impressed by how wide open the WRs were vs air, good lord.