The Not Too Early Midseason Projected One Seeds

[hussybulldog]

If ND wins out they are a #1. Not even close.

I agreem if ND wins out, their #2 seed opponent will be either MSST or P12 winner, most likely MSST

 

[tomcat]

I cannot imagine ND not being a #1 if they win the rest of their games.

 

[Grad1990]

I disagree, they will want the 1 in Albany, especially if it’s with a 1 or 2 OVERALL seed. You would rather play NC State or Stanford to advance to the FF than one of the top 4 teams.

You've now referred three times to Notre Dame's "huge non-conference loss". Are you talking about their loss to UConn? That is their only non-conference loss. Their loss to the Tar Heels may have been a "huge" loss and a "bad" loss, but it was an in-conference game.

I was referring to the loss to the Tar Heels. In the scheme of things I don't think losing to UConn is that big a deal.

 

[Monte]

No, it's not.

Then you put Uconn out West, and put Baylor in Albany. Then, compare the attendance in Albany from last year to this year...................................See if the NCAA does that again.

 

[Vowelguy]

Then you put Uconn out West, and put Baylor in Albany. Then, compare the attendance in Albany from last year to this year..........See if the NCAA does that again.

The thread is about seeding.
You said: "It's all about $."

Show me proof that _seeding_, not placement of teams in regions, is ALL based on $.
Show me proof that any seeding is based on $.

 

[Monte]

The thread is about seeding.
You said: "It's all about $."

Show me proof that _seeding_, not placement of teams in regions, is ALL based on $.
Show me proof that any seeding is based on $.

Let's talk Albany again. If Uconn is seeded #1, they WILL go to Albany(sold out every game). Let's say they are seeded 13th.......probably won't go to Albany=no sell outs there=less gate receipts.
Ask any farmer: better seeds mean more money.