The next step in the development of UConn quarterback Nick Evers: ‘Consistency’ (Arruda) | Page 2 | The Boneyard

The next step in the development of UConn quarterback Nick Evers: ‘Consistency’ (Arruda)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think what you see, that missing "IT", is the result of a number of factors, most of which have been discussed on this board in some way shape or form. Often what you see manifests as timidity, tightness, tentativeness or unsuredness. Calm down(ie play with confidence, play relaxed, be sure of yourself, play loose etc etc etc) is a big part of it. That calming comes as many of the factors below work themselves out through Reps.

1. lack of playing over the last 3 years ie experience
2. loss of confidence because of what he was and what he has become (ie superstar TX hs QB to portal version of a "journeyman ballplayer" different team every spring training)
3. lack of confidence, see # 1&2
4. inconsistent developmental progression in this season due to injuries
5. First year in a new system, with a 1st year OC and 1st year QB coach

He may get the requisite reps to work through those issues naturally or in an organic fashion BUT the $64,000 question posed in an earlier thread becomes, CAN HE? Many don't believe he can. Mora is committed to finding out. Hopefully our Huskies don't pay a price for finding out that answer if it is NO. As always, we are all rooting for Nick and Coach Mora!

Go Huskies.

Maybe you should invent 5 more excuses. This place needs to wake up and smell the coffee. He is not a good QB.

1. We are seeing why he didn't have any playing time.
2. Lame excuse
3. Literally the same lame excuse stated again. In fact, Mora annointed him the starter and then in the presser he basically said he would start no matter what. He doesn't have to worry about getting benched like every other QB. He should feel like he is playing with house money.
4. Hecould have developed at Oklahoma and Wisconsin. At Wisconsin the rub on Evers is that he didn't work hard and didn't learn the offense. Seems like this is self inflicted by and large.
5. Literally the same excuse as #1. We are now seeing why he is in his third system in three years. Again see #1

Lastly. No amount of reps will help him. You want to keep playing him because maybe Fagnano is indistinguishably better and because he's gone then fine. But you better win
 
Maybe you should invent 5 more excuses. This place needs to wake up and smell the coffee. He is not a good QB.

1. We are seeing why he didn't have any playing time.
2. Lame excuse
3. Literally the same lame excuse stated again. In fact, Mora annointed him the starter and then in the presser he basically said he would start no matter what. He doesn't have to worry about getting benched like every other QB. He should feel like he is playing with house money.
4. Hecould have developed at Oklahoma and Wisconsin. At Wisconsin the rub on Evers is that he didn't work hard and didn't learn the offense. Seems like this is self inflicted by and large.
5. Literally the same excuse as #1. We are now seeing why he is in his third system in three years. Again see #1

Lastly. No amount of reps will help him. You want to keep playing him because maybe Fagnano is indistinguishably better and because he's gone then fine. But you better win
Hey Einstein, not an endorsement of NE. Doc Who asked a simple question, just regurgitated summary of many of the conversations/debates that have gone on here. Many folks don't think he can do it for a variety of reasons, pretty sure I'm in that camp, but praying for lightning.

Rooting for the kid, he's a Husky and he is going to play.
 
Hey Einstein, not an endorsement of NE. Doc Who asked a simple question, just regurgitated summary of many of the conversations/debates that have gone on here. Many folks don't think he can do it for a variety of reasons, pretty sure I'm in that camp, but praying for lightning.

Rooting for the kid, he's a Husky and he is going to play.

“This place” must be confusing for you.

Many folks in this place thought Jack Zergiotis was the real deal.

It’s like the Boneyard has QB Beer Goggles.
 
As Ross Tucker on TV pointed out. In the 4th quarter Wake looked perfectly content to let him have those short passes. I mean it’s to his credit that he did it, but they intentionally allowed the offense to do that since they passes were so short they wouldn’t even result in a 1st Down.

Maybe if you were in the stadium you got the impression that all of the sudden Evers was Patrick Mahomes. But that just simply wasn’t what happened.
Yeah. I was at that one. Good observation then, cause it looked like he was turning a corner.
 
I feel like some of the negative commentary here is based on an unrealistic view of our ability to go in the portal and get a higher level quarterback. The reality is we are a mid level G 5 program at this time. We certainly have aspirations to aim higher, great. However for purposes of portal acquisitions we have to understand what the limits are for the program in terms of getting a finished product quarterback right now. We are not UConn Basketball; and Mora (unlike Hurley) does not have the option of grabbing a high level guy whenever he wants. Yes, Evers is a work in progress, but compared to who/what? Look at some of the portal quarterbacks we have faced this season - Fancher (FAU from Marshall); Ogbonnna (Buffalo from SE MO State); Brock (Temple from Santa Monica CC). Were you impressed with any of these guys? These are the types of portal quarterbacks we are realistically competing for - inexperienced P4 guys looking for a shot and needing a lot of development (Evers for example), G5 guys making a lateral move for money, FCS/CC guys looking to move up the ladder (Joe F). When judged against this standard, I don't think Evers has been as bad as some on here are suggesting.
 
.-.
I feel like some of the negative commentary here is based on an unrealistic view of our ability to go in the portal and get a higher level quarterback.
Mine is based on seeing the QB throw a 7-yard pass to a wide open receiver 3 feet behind the guy knowing that if it was on the money it goes for at least 20.
 
I feel like some of the negative commentary here is based on an unrealistic view of our ability to go in the portal and get a higher level quarterback. The reality is we are a mid level G 5 program at this time. We certainly have aspirations to aim higher, great. However for purposes of portal acquisitions we have to understand what the limits are for the program in terms of getting a finished product quarterback right now. We are not UConn Basketball; and Mora (unlike Hurley) does not have the option of grabbing a high level guy whenever he wants. Yes, Evers is a work in progress, but compared to who/what? Look at some of the portal quarterbacks we have faced this season - Fancher (FAU from Marshall); Ogbonnna (Buffalo from SE MO State); Brock (Temple from Santa Monica CC). Were you impressed with any of these guys? These are the types of portal quarterbacks we are realistically competing for - inexperienced P4 guys looking for a shot and needing a lot of development (Evers for example), G5 guys making a lateral move for money, FCS/CC guys looking to move up the ladder (Joe F). When judged against this standard, I don't think Evers has been as bad as some on here are suggesting.
The kid at Eastern Michigan transferred from Buffalo where he had solid numbers including 1 3k yard passing season. I'd rather bring in a guy like that with maybe a lower ceiling and higher floor than basically a complete unknown. Apparently UConn was either #1, or #2, in football NIL in the G5 if reports are accurate. Only Memphis may have been higher. Given the caliber of play from guys like Skyler Bell, Jayden McDonald, Jack Barton, Wes Hoeh, Jordan Wright etc, they identified and had the resources to bring in quality plug and play guys everywhere but whiffed on QB. Hopefully with time, they find a ready to go QB if they don't develop a guy in house.
 
I feel like some of the negative commentary here is based on an unrealistic view of our ability to go in the portal and get a higher level quarterback. The reality is we are a mid level G 5 program at this time. We certainly have aspirations to aim higher, great. However for purposes of portal acquisitions we have to understand what the limits are for the program in terms of getting a finished product quarterback right now. We are not UConn Basketball; and Mora (unlike Hurley) does not have the option of grabbing a high level guy whenever he wants. Yes, Evers is a work in progress, but compared to who/what? Look at some of the portal quarterbacks we have faced this season - Fancher (FAU from Marshall); Ogbonnna (Buffalo from SE MO State); Brock (Temple from Santa Monica CC). Were you impressed with any of these guys? These are the types of portal quarterbacks we are realistically competing for - inexperienced P4 guys looking for a shot and needing a lot of development (Evers for example), G5 guys making a lateral move for money, FCS/CC guys looking to move up the ladder (Joe F). When judged against this standard, I don't think Evers has been as bad as some on here are suggesting.

You don’t think we can find and recruit a QB in the portal who can perform better than Zion Turner levels of production? With our NIL $?

I disagree.

They took a swing with Evers and all signs point to that being a swing and a miss.

Maybe the next one will hit, or McDonald and Welliver will actually be great for us and we can just get a depth QB.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,170
Messages
4,555,674
Members
10,441
Latest member
Virginiafan


Top Bottom