I believe they did. Close first half, 22 turnovers, 22 personal fouls committed, only 3 scorers, freshman point had a tough game, their freshman forward off the bench had 4 fouls in 6 minutes. All against a mediocre ASU team that Uconn would beat by 30-40.Tony, ND didn't struggle at all.
Gotta wonder now if UConn faces LVille again????
Rarely have I seen a Huskie team play anything but at a high level, regardless of their opponent. That is the philosophy that has made the Huskies the kind of team they are. They seldom, if ever, take a play off. They compete against themselves, more than their opponents, game after game. They've been involved in so many blowouts over the years but they're like a bunch of mustangs, you let them loose and they want to run. Period! I don't see that changing anytime soon.I hope we don't slack off...that could be detrimental to our future.
The Ville has gotta win at Iowa, then possibly vs WV, before it even gets a possible matchup with TN.
Charlie Creme thought they struggled...
5. McStruggles? It is hard to find fault when an unbeaten team moves into the Sweet 16 with a 17-point win, but Notre Dame's 84-67 win over Arizona State was not its best effort by a long shot. It's also difficult to label a 22-point, nine-assist game lacking, but Kayla McBride, Notre Dame's best player on most nights, was not her best either.
The Sun Devils choked the Irish's normally fluid offense for the better part of 25 minutes, and Notre Dame committed 22 turnovers. Until making three straight buckets five minutes into the second half, McBride was floundering with just two field goals in 11 attempts.
So does Texas A&M.A&M vs DePaul should be a great game. Both teams with small lineups that like to run and gun. The commentators that like offense should love this game if it happens.
Then the winner potentially faces, UConn and will a quick talented roster be able to withstand UConn's size advantage. Of course UConn first has to get there.
Agree, UCONN's bracket definitely did not get tougher by having BYU and DePaul advance.I still disagree but no point in debating. I get your opinion. Duke, IMHO, was already the weakest 2 seed in our bracket. Not sure why our bracket suddenly got tougher since Duke lost. Had they won, would it have been an easier bracket? By that logic, the fact that BYU beat Nebraska means our bracket is tougher because BYU is better than Nebraska.
Like I said, Depaul still needs to get past aTm. We beat BYU by 40+ and Depaul/aTm by 30+, unless Geno calls off the dogs and plays most of the 2nd half with Banks, Chong, Stoks, and then maybe Mo and one other starter...
Then the winner potentially faces, UConn and with a quick talented roster be able to withstand UConn's size advantage.
I don't understand this logic at all. Can you explain?
Instead of with, I should have typed will a quick talented roster be able to withstand UConn..
I'm making the assumption that A&M will win tonight and face DePaul in the Regional Semi-finals. Then the winner will be a quick team that uses a four guard line-up going up against UConn's size advantage. I also said UConn has to get there.
Yes, we do. I don't consider winning by 51 a struggle. When you play sloppy and win by 17 I don't consider it a struggle. Struggle to me means the other team is challenging and pushing you. I don't think ASU did that to ND. ND had three players scoring at will. My take is that ND should have won by 25 and UCONN by 35.I believe they did. Close first half, 22 turnovers, 22 personal fouls committed, only 3 scorers, freshman point had a tough game, their freshman forward off the bench had 4 fouls in 6 minutes. All against a mediocre ASU team that Uconn would beat by 30-40.
Doesn't mean they will play that way in the next game, but we clearly have a different view in what constitutes a struggle.
Too funny. Since you didn't have a question Mark, I thought you mistyped and I changed "will" to "with".
So, for clarities sake you said "will a quick talented roster be able to withstand UConn's size advantage?"
Now I can answer. No.
I still disagree but no point in debating. I get your opinion. Duke, IMHO, was already the weakest 2 seed in our bracket. Not sure why our bracket suddenly got tougher since Duke lost. Had they won, would it have been an easier bracket? By that logic, the fact that BYU beat Nebraska means our bracket is tougher because BYU is better than Nebraska. Like I said, Depaul still needs to get past aTm. We beat BYU by 40+ and Depaul/aTm by 30+, unless Geno calls off the dogs and plays most of the 2nd half with Banks, Chong, Stoks, and then maybe Mo and one other starter...
Agree, UCONN's bracket definitely did not get tougher by having BYU and DePaul advance.
Yes, we do. I don't consider winning by 51 a struggle. When you play sloppy and win by 17 I don't consider it a struggle. Struggle to me means the other team is challenging and pushing you. I don't think ASU did that to ND. ND had three players scoring at will. My take is that ND should have won by 25 and UCONN by 35.
BTW, the western bear cub is a junior on ASU.
I'm disappointed. I wanted to see UConn play Nebraska in front of a crazy crowd. Oh well.
... BYU? Holy cow. I predict a win of about 84-40. And Depaul or aTm will be lucky to come within 25 of UCONN.
You asked a question, correct?I didn't give my opinion on what the results would be if UConn vs Depaul or A&M would meet. I do think DePaul would give UConn the better game as they're more disciplined. However, if they do meet, I do think UConn would win comfortably. However, like I said earlier, UConn has to get there.
Those are NOT impressive numbers, plain and simple. I was surprised at even the final margins for ND and Stanford.6, 6, 4, 1, -3. Those are the halftime margins for teams last who were seeded #1 or #2. We'll see if UConn can do better than that tonight, but it's hard to say any of the top teams were breezing in the first half of their second round games. Most managed to get things going better in the second half.
I can see this turning into a "jump shot" thread so I'll only make one comment.Yes, we do. I don't consider winning by 51 a struggle. When you play sloppy and win by 17 I don't consider it a struggle. Struggle to me means the other team is challenging and pushing you. I don't think ASU did that to ND. ND had three players scoring at will. My take is that ND should have won by 25 and UCONN by 35.
BTW, the western bear cub is a junior on ASU.
You asked a question, correct?
Did you not know the answer?