- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 4,319
- Reaction Score
- 7,407
Yes, the definite synergy is what I'm talking about. And I agree that neither program is derivative of the other. Minor quibble that Perno's late tenure teams did not sell out regularly - and I remember a particularly frustrating game in New Haven where there were more Syracuse than UConn fans present.Disagree that the men’s program is somehow derivative of the women’s program and given the history of both. The men’s program was selling out well before Jim Calhoun got there. At the same time the woman’s program was playing before crowds of, maybe, 100 people.
On the other hand, the 1995 women’s team generated a ton of goodwill for the University and arguably spurred the UConn 2000 funding, which was a big jumpstart for the University and its current form.
There’s definitely synergy though of having to outstanding basketball programs at the same school.
Let me frame it a different way. Jim Calhoun and Geno Auriemma clearly didn't get along & essentially operated independent parallel programs, two lines to greatness that did not meet. There is NO doubt that either of them would have had the same success on their own. Full stop. And because of their prickly relationship we (fans) grew accustomed to thinking about the teams as separate silos of excellence. I think especially true for UConn alums that were there when Calhoun & Geno were so fiercely independent.
Now an improved relationship between the coaches & the school sprung from pride amongst the players and students to make it abundantly clear that there can be a synergistic relationship at UConn that raises the ceiling for both basketball programs. The lines eventually met and headed ever upwards together. You can feel that difference on campus now (I was at UConn this past Saturday with my son for accepted students day), students, faculty, everyone takes pride in the basketball programs as a whole.