The impact of laundry

[ctchamps]

I think it matters a lot. When a recruit visits, a common tactic is having a jersey with their name on it so they can see and maybe feel what it’s like to be part of that history.

And I think the pro sports are losing some of that with all these gimmick jerseys for promotions or merch sales.

Geno doesn’t do this. And a number of posters in the women’s forum think it’s tacky.

 

[ctchamps]

Hurley was at Wagner and Rhode Island and never came anywhere near a national championship at either school.

It’s because he only began at UConn to wear the same underwear until he lost. I have no clue if this is true but it fits into the laundry narrative.

 

[ucp990411]

Love our uniforms with Connecticut spelled out. Both home and away

 

[FfldCntyFan]

The only laundry that matters is @Chief00's briefs

I don't know about that. Dan Hurley's dragon briefs (or whatever design he is currently sporting) are quite important. Chiefs, not so much.

 

[Spaceman213J]

I remember a while back, a paper was going to do a study based on a hockey team. The LA Kings were switching to all-black or mostly black uniforms and the paper hypothesized that the uniforms might make the players more aggressive and physical for the next season and wonder if it would translate into more wins for the team.
In the end, they said the wins/losses record was useless because shortly after the uniform decision announcement the Kings traded for some guy name Gretzky.

 

[Alum86]

Love our uniforms with Connecticut spelled out. Both home and away

Hurley never bought into that whole rebrand thing. I guess the whole switch to “UConn” and the Cub Scout wolf dog
Went out the window, as hoop wears the retro dog primarily. Win nattys and you can do whatever you want. So no, laundry does not matter.