CL82
James Breeding sucks
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 63,949
- Reaction Score
- 251,327
I actually didn't think Casablanca was that great
I actually didn't think Casablanca was that great

“ATTACK” also starred Jack Palance- great movie!In the limited category of World War II films I'll give you three of my favorites:
Navy: "The Cruel Sea"
Air Force (Corps): "Twelve O'Clock High"
Army: I suppose most folks would go with Saving Pvt Ryan, and it's a fine film, but
let me suggest a small offbeat film called "Attack" in which Eddie Albert gives perhaps
his finest, if least sympathetic, performance.
Speaking of Jack Palance, I'd like to give a shout out to The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance. Maybe not one of the 10 best made movies, but one of my faves. I used to include it in on course called Cinematic Images of the Law.“ATTACK” also starred Jack Palance- great movie!
Regarding exceptional war movies, might I add “A WALK IN THE SUN” as well as “PATHS OF GLORY- exceptional cast including Kirk Douglas—regarded as the greatest anti-war war film of all time.
Enjoying this thread.
Many well versed film fans here.
Me- I have a wide range in taste , but an affinity for Film Noir
A tour de force for Lee Marvin.Speaking of Jack Palance, I'd like to give a shout out to The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance. Maybe not one of the 10 best made movies, but one of my faves. I used to include it in on course called Cinematic Images of the Law.
I would also add “Air Force” the movie, “They Were Expendable”, and “Wake Island”.In the limited category of World War II films I'll give you three of my favorites:
Navy: "The Cruel Sea"
Air Force (Corps): "Twelve O'Clock High"
Army: I suppose most folks would go with Saving Pvt Ryan, and it's a fine film, but
let me suggest a small offbeat film called "Attack" in which Eddie Albert gives perhaps
his finest, if least sympathetic, performance.
Ed, let me add three movies you might really like in this category:In the limited category of World War II films I'll give you three of my favorites:
Navy: "The Cruel Sea"
Air Force (Corps): "Twelve O'Clock High"
Army: I suppose most folks would go with Saving Pvt Ryan, and it's a fine film, but
let me suggest a small offbeat film called "Attack" in which Eddie Albert gives perhaps
his finest, if least sympathetic, performance.
You are right. I mixed up Jack Palance and Lee Marvin. Palance was the star of Have Gun Will Travel. They both were leathery tough guys, although Paladin (the character Palance portrayed) was an upholder of the law, albeit in an outlaw kinda way.A tour de force for Lee Marvin.
Sorry Crossover, you’re wrong again. Richard Boone was the star of Have Gun Will Travel. Shane has been mentioned in this thread and Jack Palance did play the villain in that one.You are right. I mixed up Jack Palance and Lee Marvin. Palance was the star of Have Gun Will Travel. They both were leathery tough guys, although Paladin (the character Palance portrayed) was an upholder of the law, albeit in an outlaw kinda way.
“Jack Wilson” was one of the scariest bad guys in all of cinema and in one of the greatest movies ever made.Sorry Crossover, you’re wrong again. Richard Boone was the star of Have Gun Will Travel. Shane has been mentioned in this thread and Jack Palance did play the villain in that one.
I saw a list like that, but can’t recall the source, which gave grades. The highest for movies like Citizen Kane was 99/100, which contributes to my previous cheeky comment about “perfectly made.”So I realized Charlie is missing - Modern Times or City Lights? Marx Bros?
Here's AFI's list of 100:
I am at 94 of the 100 and not sure I agree with all of them, but it is a good starting place. If you go to that site and do the 'back to lists' in the upper left - they have lots more different configurations that are also fun.![]()
AFI’s 100 YEARS…100 MOVIES
AFI’s 100 YEARS…100 MOVIES The very first edition of AFI's 100 Years...100 Movies is a list of the 100 greatest American films of all time.In 1998, AFI invited more than 1,500 lwww.afi.com
Still not sure what perfectly made actually means or how they define it in the OP.
When I think back on some of those golden era movies, what stands out as much as the stars is the quality of all the other actors and how beautifully even the bit parts were filled with interest. One of the reasons that The Usual Suspects stands out to me, or Tarantino's films - the breadth of the casts is impressive.
I wouldn’t confuse a “perfectly made movie” with one of the “greatest films ever made”. There’s a difference, and it’s a big one. A perfectly made movie CAN be one of the greatest films ever made, but it’s not necessarily the other way around, meaning there are quite a few of the greatest films ever made that are NOT perfectly made. A perfectly made film, to my way of thinking, are great films that had meticulous scripting, great story and dialogue, camera work, editing, lighting, and acting. Every scene and every camera shot in that scene has a story board, which are actual large physical boards made up by the art department. Hitchcock made his films this way, as did Orson Welles, and for the most part David Lean, George Stevens, Leo McCarey, George Cukor and John Ford. Although McCarey, Cukor, Ford and Stevens sometimes let their cinematographers and actors stray from the plan. At the other end of the spectrum there’s directors like Robert Altman in M*A*S*H who just let his actors ad lib many scenes and made a great film, or as Frank Capra or Oliver Stone did in many of their films. Their method is different but a lucky shoot can be a great shoot that captures a priceless scene.I saw a list like that, but can’t recall the source, which gave grades. The highest for movies like Citizen Kane was 99/100, which contributes to my previous cheeky comment about “perfectly made.”
The methodology behind this list is laudable, but I would think Fantasia to be in the top 100 for its groundbreaking uniqueness alone. Outside of that who am I to argue with 1500 experts?
“Perfectly made” is hyperbolic phrasing to engage people. It implies no flaws, but what are the operational standards by which one can conclude no flaws were made? At least the phrasing “greatest” does not imply the movie has been empirically determined to contain no flaws.I wouldn’t confuse a “perfectly made movie” with one of the “greatest films ever made”. There’s a difference, and it’s a big one. A perfectly made movie CAN be one of the greatest films ever made, but it’s not necessarily the other way around, meaning there are quite a few of the greatest films ever made that are NOT perfectly made. A perfectly made film, to my way of thinking, are great films that had meticulous scripting, great story and dialogue, camera work, editing, lighting, and acting. Every scene and every camera shot in that scene has a story board, which are actual large physical boards made up by the art department. Hitchcock made his films this way, as did Orson Welles, and for the most part David Lean, George Stevens, Leo McCarey, George Cukor and John Ford. Although McCarey, Cukor, Ford and Stevens sometimes let their cinematographers and actors stray from the plan. At the other end of the spectrum there’s directors like Robert Altman in M*A*S*H who just let his actors ad lib many scenes and made a great film, or as Frank Capra or Oliver Stone did in many of their films. Their method is different but a lucky shoot can be a great shoot that captures a priceless scene.
I agree and we are all going to view "perfect" through our own lens. Still, Godfather and Casablanca seemed to come very close to that high standard.“Perfectly made” is hyperbolic phrasing to engage people. It implies no flaws, but what are the operational standards by which one can conclude no flaws were made? At least the phrasing “greatest” does not imply the movie has been empirically determined to contain no flaws.
Ed, let me add three movies you might really like in this category:
1944 The Best Years of Our Lives. You'd have to be heartless not to be moved by this movie.
1957 The Bridge on the River Kwai Sir Alec Guiness ( before Star Wars), and William Holden.
1957 "The Enemy Below" William Holden (again) and Curt Jurgens play a cat and mouse game between an American Destroyer and a German U-Boat. If you haven't heard of it, take the time to watch it.
Honorable mentions go to "Platoon," "Full Metal Jacket," "Decision Before Dawn," (w/Oskar Werner and Richard Basehart--most excellent!), and of course, Kubrick's "Paths of Glory," w/Kirk Douglas, Adoph Menjou and George MacReady.
Enjoy!
-
Yikes. I can't keep my tough guys straight. Time to resort to Google rather than trusting my tired and ancient brain. Who would you pick in a face off between Palance, Boone and Marvin?Sorry Crossover, you’re wrong again. Richard Boone was the star of Have Gun Will Travel. Shane has been mentioned in this thread and Jack Palance did play the villain in that one.
And was the basis of my favorite Star Trek episode."The Enemy Below" is excellent. It is one of the few movies I never turn down the opportunity to watch.