The effect of the transfer portal on high school recruiting | Page 3 | The Boneyard

The effect of the transfer portal on high school recruiting

Mike Farrell said it in an interview which you obviously didn't hear. He makes his living dealing with high school football players and is an expert in football recruiting. You are not, so yes I'll believe his opinion over yours.
Where’s the conflict? The Mike Farrell’s of the world focus their comments on the big schools of the world (more clicks). So it’s logical that he would see fewer offers at those schools to high schoolers as they replaced by players being “promoted” from schools lower in the totem pole (“Georgia State” in b-lawyers example). The high schoolers superstars will still get P4 offers. The next tiers down, that traditionally got later offers, “non-commitable offers” or just “interest” from the P4 plus a boatload of non-P4 offers will just get the latter. Hence, fewer overall offers in total. However, at some point the total number of scholarship players into the system must equal the total number going out.
 
Where’s the conflict? The Mike Farrell’s of the world focus their comments on the big schools of the world (more clicks). So it’s logical that he would see fewer offers at those schools to high schoolers as they replaced by players being “promoted” from schools lower in the totem pole (“Georgia State” in b-lawyers example). The high schoolers superstars will still get P4 offers. The next tiers down, that traditionally got later offers, “non-commitable offers” or just “interest” from the P4 plus a boatload of non-P4 offers will just get the latter. Hence, fewer overall offers in total. However, at some point the total number of scholarship players into the system must equal the total number going out.
The point is there as re less scholarship offers to high school players. All of a sudden players who would get FBS offers are trying to get FCS offers. Not that hard to understand. FCS see schools are reducing freshman scholarships and all other schools are subject to the same scholarship limits resulting in an overall net reduction.
 
The point is there as re less scholarship offers to high school players. All of a sudden players who would get FBS offers are trying to get FCS offers. Not that hard to understand. FCS see schools are reducing freshman scholarships and all other schools are subject to the same scholarship limits resulting in an overall net reduction.
This is a pipeline system. If the total number of scholarships available (capacity of pipe) is constant from year to year, then number in must equal number out. Kids can shuffle between a scholarship at school A to one at school B, but that doesn’t change the total capacity of the system. School A will go outside the system (incoming freshman) for one more and school B will add one less. Yes, that may mean that a kid who would have gotten an offer at dream school B may have to start at “lesser school A” but it’s still a scholarship. Unless schools start decreasing their number of scholarship slots total opportunity is constant.
 
This is a pipeline system. If the total number of scholarships available (capacity of pipe) is constant from year to year, then number in must equal number out. Kids can shuffle between a scholarship at school A to one at school B, but that doesn’t change the total capacity of the system. School A will go outside the system (incoming freshman) for one more and school B will add one less. Yes, that may mean that a kid who would have gotten an offer at dream school B may have to start at “lesser school A” but it’s still a scholarship. Unless schools start decreasing their number of scholarship slots total opportunity is constant.
No because teams at the we FCS level turn to D2 and D3 players to fill their rosters with kids who were non scholarship players coming out of school. Yes the total will be constant but total scholarships available to high school seniors will be reduced.
 
It's funny that @businesslawyer two-way blocks me so I can't see what he's saying, but from what I can see he's the only one who agrees with me!
 
Football roster is capped @ 105 and schools have the option to provide all athletes up to a full scholarship.

No more 125+ rosters including walk-ons.
And FCS can offer partial or half scholarships.
 
.-.
Mike Farrell said it in an interview which you obviously didn't hear. He makes his living dealing with high school football players and is an expert in football recruiting. You are not, so yes I'll believe his opinion over yours.
He does make his living doing this. Doesn’t make him not an idiot. We’ve followed his abilities on this board for 20 years. But does he speak to more people involved in football than me? Absolutely. But does that change the math?
 
No because teams at the we FCS level turn to D2 and D3 players to fill their rosters with kids who were non scholarship players coming out of school. Yes the total will be constant but total scholarships available to high school seniors will be reduced.
That makes no sense. Let’s suppose 5 players transfer from lower level FBS or FCS schools to an upper level FBS team. So the upper level team will bring in 5 fewer freshmen on scholarship. However, those lower level teams will replace those 5 lost scholarship players with 5 more freshmen scholarship players. Are you claiming coaches of lower-level programs will sit around in staff meetings saying “now we’re under our authorized scholarship count but we’re not going to use those slots and blame it on the portal”? Seriously?

The only ways the portal can decrease the number of freshman slots (and they will have relatively minor impact) is two-fold: (1) increased transfer liquidity may enable players that would have quit in the past after being dropped from power teams to transfer down to a lower-end scholarship program; and (2) increased liquidity enabling more stars at non-scholarship schools (e.g. Ivies) to transfer to a scholarship program. Both types of transfers occurred pre-portal, but some extra cases may come up because it is easier. They are also temporary transients as any net loss now will be offset by an increase in the open scholarship count in the next few years when they graduate. Total in must still equal total out.
 
Last edited:
That makes no sense. Let’s suppose 5 players transfer from lower level FBS or FCS schools to an upper level FBS team. So the upper level team will bring in 5 fewer freshmen on scholarship. However, those lower level teams will replace those 5 lost scholarship players with 5 more freshmen scholarship players. Are you claiming coaches of lower-level programs will sit around in staff meetings saying “now we’re under our authorized scholarship count but we’re not going to use those slots and blame it on the portal”? Seriously?

The only ways the portal can decrease the number of freshman slots (and they will have relatively minor impact) is two-fold: (1) increased transfer liquidity may enable players that would have quit in the past after being dropped from power teams to transfer down to a lower-end scholarship program; and (2) increased liquidity enabling more stars at non-scholarship schools (e.g. Ivies) to transfer to a scholarship program. Both types of transfers occurred pre-portal, but some extra cases may come up because it is easier. They are also temporary transients as any net loss now will be offset by an increase in the open scholarship count in the next few years when they graduate. Total in must still equal total out.
The D2 and D3 players who replace the FCS players were not full ride scholarship players. The total scholarship players will be stable, but the net result is less scholarship offers to high school seniors. It's already happening. FBS schools are offering less scholarships to high school seniors.
 
The D2 and D3 players who replace the FCS players were not full ride scholarship players. The total scholarship players will be stable, but the net result is less scholarship offers to high school seniors. It's already happening. FBS schools are offering less scholarships to high school seniors.
I'd like to see some real evidence this is happening - D2 and D3 players moving into the full scholarship ranks in numbers significant enough to observably impact D1 high school FB recruiting. The difference between full scholarship football and partial or no-scholarship football is huge. I would just have two comments: (1) When it happens it's a good thing because it indicates that kids who were not judged as being worthy of a full scholarship out of high school are earning them on collegiate fields: and (2) It's hard to imagine that it is significant since it would require FCS coaches to ignore a pool of high quality high school players that you've identified as falling off FBS recruiting boards. If I'm the coach at Central I might pick up an occasional late bloomer from Southern, but more often than not I'm going to give priority to a higher performing high school kid who would have signed with UConn but for available D1 transfers taking the spot (schools selected for illustrative purposes only). Hell, with easy portal transfers you may even see FBS programs directing players just off their recruiting boards to friendly FCS schools in much the same way they help them get to preps or JUCOs to be available as future signees.
 
I'd like to see some real evidence this is happening - D2 and D3 players moving into the full scholarship ranks in numbers significant enough to observably impact D1 high school FB recruiting. The difference between full scholarship football and partial or no-scholarship football is huge. I would just have two comments: (1) When it happens it's a good thing because it indicates that kids who were not judged as being worthy of a full scholarship out of high school are earning them on collegiate fields: and (2) It's hard to imagine that it is significant since it would require FCS coaches to ignore a pool of high quality high school players that you've identified as falling off FBS recruiting boards. If I'm the coach at Central I might pick up an occasional late bloomer from Southern, but more often than not I'm going to give priority to a higher performing high school kid who would have signed with UConn but for available D1 transfers taking the spot (schools selected for illustrative purposes only). Hell, with easy portal transfers you may even see FBS programs directing players just off their recruiting boards to friendly FCS schools in much the same way they help them get to preps or JUCOs to be available as future signees.
I have seen it in the baseball side. D3 head students moving to D1. Just grateful the Covid players end this year. There are 23 year olds taking spots from 18 and 19 year olds. Been happening since they added the extra year.
 
I'd like to see some real evidence this is happening - D2 and D3 players moving into the full scholarship ranks in numbers significant enough to observably impact D1 high school FB recruiting. The difference between full scholarship football and partial or no-scholarship football is huge. I would just have two comments: (1) When it happens it's a good thing because it indicates that kids who were not judged as being worthy of a full scholarship out of high school are earning them on collegiate fields: and (2) It's hard to imagine that it is significant since it would require FCS coaches to ignore a pool of high quality high school players that you've identified as falling off FBS recruiting boards. If I'm the coach at Central I might pick up an occasional late bloomer from Southern, but more often than not I'm going to give priority to a higher performing high school kid who would have signed with UConn but for available D1 transfers taking the spot (schools selected for illustrative purposes only). Hell, with easy portal transfers you may even see FBS programs directing players just off their recruiting boards to friendly FCS schools in much the same way they help them get to preps or JUCOs to be available as future signees.

Isn’t this exactly what UConn Baseball did?

Also have you not seen our recruiting classes the past two seasons for football? It’s light on high school recruits and heavy on transfers.

If you are trying to win now and flip your roster it’s more efficient to sign seasoned transfers instead of high school seniors.

Sure the top programs will load up on blue chips every year. But there are only so many.

High School kids are going to end up with FCS and below more and more.
 
.-.
I have seen it in the baseball side. D3 head students moving to D1. Just grateful the Covid players end this year. There are 23 year olds taking spots from 18 and 19 year olds. Been happening since they added the extra year.
Understood, but baseball is a different animal. First, MLB takes much of the top tier straight out of high school. Second, the vast majority of the best college players are again draft eligible and leave after junior year. Lastly, it’s a partial scholarship sport. D1 teams get 10-12 scholarhips for the entire roster. Many kids can do as well or better with financial aid to a lower level school (athletically, not necessarily academically) as with a D1 scholarship. As a result, the gaps between D1 and D2 and between D2 and D3 are smaller. While MLB players from D2 or D3 are still unusual, they are common and the minors are littered with them. top college teams can also use them to fill in leadership gaps left by highly drafted juniors.
 
Guys have more eligibility than before. So they occupy roster spots for longer.

The opportunities are open in FCS and lower. But for FBS outside of the top schools, places are taking less HS players because portal kids are giving them the most bang for the buck.

Also makes sense not to spend end of roster scholarships on guys who are likely to transfer out before they ever see the field.

You'd rather have 3 extra portal guys with a track record than the last 3 HS options.

Before the portal, these guys just dropped FB altogether and became regular students. Now, they can find a roster spot at another school a lot more easily and get paid to do it.
 
Understood, but baseball is a different animal. First, MLB takes much of the top tier straight out of high school. Second, the vast majority of the best college players are again draft eligible and leave after junior year. Lastly, it’s a partial scholarship sport. D1 teams get 10-12 scholarhips for the entire roster. Many kids can do as well or better with financial aid to a lower level school (athletically, not necessarily academically) as with a D1 scholarship. As a result, the gaps between D1 and D2 and between D2 and D3 are smaller. While MLB players from D2 or D3 are still unusual, they are common and the minors are littered with them. top college teams can also use them to fill in leadership gaps left by highly drafted juniors.
All valid points but we had to pony up a year for post grad. While he got a substantial scholarship it was still about what UConn costs. Prep schools are not cheap but he had a great experience although scholastically he didn’t need it.

FYI NCAA will now allow 34 full scholarships starting next year. Unfortunately it does mean a school will make the money available.
 
.-.
Yup. And the reason why the NCAA doesn’t enforce rules anymore is because when they do, they get sued for it.
again, with feeling, all of this is an absolute joke.
 
It's no way to run a railroad. And according to our "friend" Mike Farrell, it is drastically reducing the amount of scholarship offers being made to high school seniors. Easier for most teams to recruit from the portal, especially those with deep pockets.
Double edged sword, the top tier recruits get paid. The second and third tier seek out Maura. Sit at Alaba or start at Connecticut. Let the power four do the work in high-school. UConn will sort through and take the potential. Yay NIL, no money or time for second string...welcome to UConn.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
168,158
Messages
4,555,154
Members
10,438
Latest member
UConnheart


Top Bottom