Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HuskyHawk, post: 4738806, member: 1414"]
They also had Cal and Camby. UMass 528 W-L% all time.  They have been lousy since Cal really.  Maybe Frank Martin can turn it around, but we're talking an A-10 team and that whole league is getting crushed by the focus on hoops at P4 football schools.

Wake has a .553 W-L% since 1906.  They won 25 games two years ago.  They were consistently good under Dave Odom and Skip Prosser.  Manning wasn't good.  Let's see what Steve Forbes can do.  Wake is a quality program.

The ACC's problem is that Louisville, a historic power, is truly awful.  Notre Dame, another school with plenty of success in its history, is also awful. GT is pretty bad right now.  Syracuse slipped to mediocre.  Looking at the Big East, if not for two new coaches in Pitino and Cooley, you'd say St. Johns and Georgetown were bad as well.   But Georgetown has a .602 winning percentage all time.  Louisville is much better than that, at .657.  Notre Dame is .641.  Betting on them to continue to stink is probably a losing bet.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach