- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,382
- Reaction Score
- 23,680
KO can't coach offense.
Our highest finish in KenPom adjusted offense with him is 39 in the '14 title year. The pre-season (and 1 game) projection for this year is 74. Last year was 59, year before 100, and his first year 55.
We've had top 10 defensive finishes in that time period, but never even cracking a top 30 offense in possibly soon to be 5 years is pathetic. If you don't get easy or high % shots, you can lose games to anybody on a bad shooting night, which is part of the reason why we have been upset rather more frequently under KO.
We had top 20 offenses 2 of the 4 Calhoun years immediately proceeding KO and had a few top 10 years during that decade.
I'm not saying he can't improve as an offensive coach, but he hasn't done a very good job on that side of the ball thus far.
He can coach offense, but it's fair to question whether his schemes are being applied in a way that fits the personnel.
This isn't just an Ollie thing, though. Calhoun's teams ran similar offenses that were highly dependent on the skills of one or two guards, and some of his lesser teams, particularly later in his career, resembled the same train-wreck in the half-court that we are seeing now.
Ollie's offense, at it's best, should naturally inspire a lot of passing. Instead, it seems to have the opposite effect. We are constantly among the worst in the nation when it comes to assists per game (or at least that's the way it seems). Contrast that to a team like SMU, whose offense is predicated on skilled bigs who can pass, catch, and score, and it's interesting to consider whether we should re-define our approach. They had 28 assists in their opener. Sometimes I wonder if we'll get that many in a month.
Of course, we don't have the personnel to run that kind of system. Brimah and Facey still looked like they just picked up a basketball and Larrier is probably to skinny to play inside/out. But maybe that falls on development.