The computers tell you one thing...

[whaler11]

Like the Big 12 can play with the SEC, yet if you own a television you watch Arkansas beat Kansas State so bad it's embarrassing.

 

[Jimmy Serrano]

All bets are off when 2 teams don't play in over a month. Arkansas is better than K State, but not THAT much better.

 

[alexrgct]

A middling Texas A&M team should have beat Arkansas in Jerry World early this season. Happens sometimes. Arkansas can recruit a hell of a lot better than K-State. Bill Snyder works miracles with not much talent, but he's never been a great bowl game coach.

 

[whaler11]

It's 19-9. It should be like 35-0. Arkansas didn't put their foot on their throat and it will probably come back to haunt them. It's almost impossible to dominate for 30 minutes like that and only be up 10.

 

[FfldCntyFan]

Can the premise in the initial post be applied to the Sugar Bowl a few years back when Utah knocked off Bama?

 

[businesslawyer]

I have no problem with looking at a season, analyzing it, and explaining why computer results don't pass the eyeball test. But to think you can do it from one game?

 

[cryjeremiah]

Seriously this OP is just silly. Lets just forget about Boise State/Okla, WVU/Okla, Utah/Bama and countless others. BL is right again. Using one single game as a form of proof is just not logical.