Actually, it is. UCONN can say how do like me now. Possibly CREI can say the same in lowercase. But as a whole, not so much the Big East who are 3-39 against Top 25 teams. Guess who owns the 3 Ws.I know it’s not the best conference but maybe it’s not quite the boat anchor people thought.
Lawdy miss Clawdy — didn’t they just trim back from 20 to 18 conference games last year? For just the reason you cite? SMHThe increase next year to 20 regular season games is AWFUL, and will hurt UConn as it will have even less flexibility to sked non-conf games.
A league with 11 teams basically doesn’t work in scheduling. With 20 games they play everyone twice.The increase next year to 20 regular season games is AWFUL, and will hurt UConn as it will have even less flexibility to sked non-conf games.
Whoa! Winless (0-39 other than UConn) against top 25 teams.I know it’s not the best conference but maybe it’s not quite the boat anchor people thought.
Nobody has divisions anymore.A league with 11 teams basically doesn’t work in scheduling. With 20 games they play everyone twice.
If the Big East adds a team and has two divisions of six would work great. Play each team in your division twice the other division once. That’s 16 games.
East: Connecticut, Georgetown, Providence, St. John’s, Seton Hall and Villanova.
West: Butler, Creighton, DePaul, Marquette, St. Louis and Xavier.
This change has me wanting to bang my head. Who made this decision and what on god's green earth is the rationale? Just to have this empty boast of a "true" round robin?The increase next year to 20 regular season games is AWFUL, and will hurt UConn as it will have even less flexibility to sked non-conf games.
Instead of St. Louis, bring in USF to get the home & home with South Florida most years without divisions.A league with 11 teams basically doesn’t work in scheduling. With 20 games they play everyone twice.
If the Big East adds a team and has two divisions of six would work great. Play each team in your division twice the other division once. That’s 16 games.
East: Connecticut, Georgetown, Providence, St. John’s, Seton Hall and Villanova.
West: Butler, Creighton, DePaul, Marquette, St. Louis and Xavier.
Whoa! I’m pretty sure no one said it was a strong conference!The Big East is a tad better than the AAC, or what passed for lunch on an Allegheny Airlines flight. Those who pretend it's a strong conference are welcome to their baseless opinions.
Well, respectfully, Nan, considering how much you seem to dislike our opining on the subject of The Big East and its relative weakness, I'm frankly surprised that you brought it up, to say nothing of the fact that, once again, respectfully, you, in my opinion, have missed the point:I know it’s not the best conference but maybe it’s not quite the boat anchor people thought.
Seeing that I’m the that started the thread, I can say that the responders here are the ones missing the point. I never said the Big East is a good conference, my point is that all the people trashing the Big East for dragging the quality of UConn’s play don’t have that excuse any more. But I’m sure folks will continue complaining about something that can’t be changed. At least we can contain the complaints in one threadWell, respectfully, Nan, considering how much you seem to dislike our opining on the subject of The Big East and its relative weakness, I'm frankly surprised that you brought it up, to say nothing of the fact that, once again, respectfully, you, in my opinion, have missed the point:
Look, the conference is comprised of perfectly lovely institutions, and if a granddaughter of mine played for any one of them I'd be the first one in the stands, wearing all the silly home-team garb I could lay my hands on, screaming lustily on their behalf. But, inevitably, at some point, UConn, which, as a practical matter, has access to recruitment talent that my granddaughter's school couldnt' dream of, is going to come to town and beat my kid's school's brains out. Some will argue (I cannot agree) that such blowout games, by giving more UConn players more minutes on the floor, better prepare the teamfor the likes of a S. Carolina game. In my maybe ill-advised opinion, playing better competition week in and week out, does that best. I think that the outcome of the three marquis games UConn lost might have been different if the team had more experience running the gauntlet under the brighter lights. And, as for my granddaughter's hypothetical team, why should they be forced to "compete" under such inequitable circumstances? True, there's nothing we fans can do about any of this, but I cannot help but find the resultant mismatches truly lamentable.
Unfortunately, it's still crap. Unlike Toby.The Big East says “How do you like me now?”
I know it’s not the best conference but maybe it’s not quite the boat anchor people thought.
We have to play the hand that is dealt to us. BTY... I do like Creighton... ILife is relative. The Big East is clearly the 5th best conference out of 31. There is no way that is terrible or pathetic. It would be a way above average conference even without Uconn. Having said that, the gap between the power 4 conferences and the Big East is large, as is the gap between Uconn and the rest of the conference.
Pretty much all of the true contenders come from the power 4 except for Uconn. Could this hurt us in television contracts, NIL money, or put us at a disadvantage in recruiting top talent? Maybe, but it is what it is, conferences are usually built based on football, and we don't stack up well there.
What I fear most is that the gap between the super conferences and the Big East will only get bigger, with the impact of NIL, and not having to wait a year in the portal. If another Big East coach develops a star in the conference, they may lose that player to a higher profile program because of greater monetary opportunities there. Think of Morrow and Olson as recent examples.