- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
- Messages
- 2,850
- Reaction Score
- 9,700
Couldn't resist:Pitt and Cuse can’t even compete in a down year. BC looks respectable in comparison.
Wake Forest 87
BC 57
Couldn't resist:Pitt and Cuse can’t even compete in a down year. BC looks respectable in comparison.
They’d possibly be top 3. Not a given thoughHouston will/would give every NBE team tons of trouble and would be one of the top 3 teams in the conference
If you dont think so - you are just fooling yourself
Let’s call it high major or power conference. The AAC has tried to make “Power 6” a thing since their inception and it’s the most embarrassing marketing move I’ve ever witnessed.High major, Power 6. Go with whatever you like or make up your own name, they are all media creations but those 6 conferences are considered different than the rest by everyone in the sport. The point is The Big East is one of the best basketball conferences in the country and considered a power conference by everyone. Gonzaga is considered a power, high major, one of the best teams in college basketball but they don't play in what's considered a power conference.
I’ll poke the bear.No team even close to the FB playoffs and now only 1 ranked team. They clearly need and addition to shore up the hoops side and add football potential. To their credit, they have 5 ranked women's team, but 6 is a better number.
I’d very much rather be in the ACC. Forget the obvious financial and football impact. Duke/UNC/Cuse/UL/Pitt/UVA/FSU/BCU move the needle for me much more than Nova/Georgetown/Prov/Xavier. One down year for the league doesn’t change the fact they’re the better basketball conference. Even if MSG will always be the best conference tournament venue.I’ll poke the bear.
I’d rather stay where we are than go to the ACC if invited. Crazy, I know, but IMO it’s Big 10 or bust for UConn.
The ACC is the next to be raided by the Big 10 / SEC if there is further expansion and the left over scraps (BC, Wake Forrest, Georgia Tech, NC State, Va Tech, Duke, Pitt, Cuse) wouldn’t be better than our current situation.
The ACC is a sitting duck with a torpedo headed it’s way in the next few years.
I mean it really depends Cuse and UL are dumpster fires, BC is well BC, Pitt isn’t a basketball school anyomore and FSU and UVA don’t move he needle for this fan base imo. The question becomes which set of conference powers do you expect to be better over the next decade. Duke/UNC or Nova/UConn. Give me Nova and UConn. Hubert Davis has not proven he can coach, and we’ll see how Duke does post KI’d very much rather be in the ACC. Forget the obvious financial and football impact. Duke/UNC/Cuse/UL/Pitt/UVA/FSU/BCU move the needle for me much more than Nova/Georgetown/Prov/Xavier. One down year for the league doesn’t change the fact they’re the better basketball conference. Even if MSG will always be the best conference tournament venue.
I agree. FSU and Clemson aren't going to sit idly by and watch SEC teams cash much larger checks, especially when the tv contracts get renewed. Question is where do the remnants of that league go? May result in the resurgence of the OBE.I’ll poke the bear.
I’d rather stay where we are than go to the ACC if invited. Crazy, I know, but IMO it’s Big 10 or bust for UConn.
The ACC is the next to be raided by the Big 10 / SEC if there is further expansion and the left over scraps (BC, Wake Forrest, Georgia Tech, NC State, Va Tech, Duke, Pitt, Cuse) wouldn’t be better than our current situation.
The ACC is a sitting duck with a torpedo headed it’s way in the next few years.
High major, Power 6. Go with whatever you like or make up your own name, they are all media creations but those 6 conferences are considered different than the rest by everyone in the sport. The point is The Big East is one of the best basketball conferences in the country and considered a power conference by everyone.
I'd assume if the league is raided, they are coming for FSU, UNC, Clemson and either UVA or UL. Look at who would be left after that BCU / Duke / Cuse / Pitt / Wake Forrest / Georgia Tech / Va Tech / Miami. Not much more appealing than Nova / Georgetown / PC / Hall / Xavier / Butler / Creighton / Marquette.I’d very much rather be in the ACC. Forget the obvious financial and football impact. Duke/UNC/Cuse/UL/Pitt/UVA/FSU/BCU move the needle for me much more than Nova/Georgetown/Prov/Xavier. One down year for the league doesn’t change the fact they’re the better basketball conference. Even if MSG will always be the best conference tournament venue.
They’re currently dumpster fires, but they have the resources to hire the right guy sooner or later. Pitt is a classic rival in the sense of old BE foe. FSU and UVA have more recent success than us with 2 all time great coaches, also in down years, most of the time they’d help us fill Gampel/XL.I mean it really depends Cuse and UL are dumpster fires, BC is well BC, Pitt isn’t a basketball school anyomore and FSU and UVA don’t move he needle for this fan base imo. The question becomes which set of conference powers do you expect to be better over the next decade. Duke/UNC or Nova/UConn. Give me Nova and UConn. Hubert Davis has not proven he can coach, and we’ll see how Duke does post K
I guess it depends how many schools and which leave. For all we know it’ll just be Clemson and FSU, which has a marginal effect on basketball.I'd assume if the league is raided, they are coming for FSU, UNC, Clemson and either UVA or UL. Look at who would be left after that BCU / Duke / Cuse / Pitt / Wake Forrest / Georgia Tech / Va Tech / Miami. Not much more appealing than Nova / Georgetown / PC / Hall / Xavier / Butler / Creighton / Marquette.
As some one else suggested, it could be interesting to do a Bball merger for the ACC and Big East if the ACC football programs get raided. I'd welcome that.