That was the NCAA high for the year so far. Gordon of Wisconsin just passed him and LT for the NCAA record. 408 after 3 quarters.WKU's RB had 345 yards rushing. One dude.
We had 353 yards total. The entire team.
That was the NCAA high for the year so far. Gordon of Wisconsin just passed him and LT for the NCAA record. 408 after 3 quarters.WKU's RB had 345 yards rushing. One dude.
We had 353 yards total. The entire team.
You mean the 2013 Huskies who got blown out at home by a 1aa team? Or the one that was embarrassed by Buffalo? Or the one who lost at home to a 2-10 South Florida squad? Sure they would handle Army. Sure.Diaco's spin for last week was we are not a very good football team but not as bad as when he got there.
It doesn't appear you need to be a very good football team to handle Army and I think last year's bad UConn team would have so Bob's spin doesn't pass the smell test.
If I never came on this board I wouldn't have known this. Damn boneyard
You mean the 2013 Huskies who got blown out at home by a 1aa team? Or the one that was embarrassed by Buffalo? Or the one who lost at home to a 2-10 South Florida squad? Sure they would handle Army. Sure.
Sometimes I wonder if people think before they post, because a lot of posts do not pass the smell test.
You mean that team that won 0 games until Cochran came in? The team that Whitmer lead to loses to Townson and Buffalo?Last year's Towson team would have wrecked this year's Army team.
And the 2013 Huskies you think so poorly of, well we still need to win another game this year to match 2013's win total. This despite being much better than when Diaco arrived.
You mean that team that won 0 games until Cochran came in? The team that Whitmer lead to loses to Townson and Buffalo?
Who is the QB of this team?
But yea, it is Diaco's fault he cannot manure into diamonds.
But tell me more about this hypothetical 2013 Townson v. 2014 army matchup, its fascinating
So the team looked good against ECU and UCF (teams so much better then Army or any team we beat last year), which clearly showed marked improvement from the start of the year when we were an absolute dumpster fire, but because they play poorly against Army and lose a game they could have won with a competent QB who does not throw it to the other team, Diaco is bum?I'd have more respect for making excuses for Diaco if you at least said "Give him more time."
But bringing up not having Cochran like last years team did at the end? Ole Bob was yanking a healthy Cochran out of games THIS year to put Whitmer in. During drives! So much for that reason.
The team was not manure the 2 weeks vs ECU and UCF. We should have won last week.
Dude from Wisconsin had 400+ yards against Nebraska. I guess Nebraska must really suck.
Referring to the players as manure is effed up. If you want to put nothing of the Army debacle on the coach is one thing but manure... really, when you know parents and recruits read these boards. Were not good, still should have been better than Army though.You mean that team that won 0 games until Cochran came in? The team that Whitmer lead to loses to Townson and Buffalo?
Who is the QB of this team?
But yea, it is Diaco's fault he cannot manure into diamonds.
But tell me more about this hypothetical 2013 Townson v. 2014 army matchup, its fascinating
Referring to the players as manure is effed up. If you want to put nothing of the Army debacle on the coach is one thing but manure... really, when you know parents and recruits read these boards. Were not good, still should have been better than Army though.
If Joe Moorhead or TJ Weist were the head coach right now, then we would have a better record.
I believe it is both. Those kids were not really in position to stop the option. There is equal blame for that on both the players and coaches. Like I said, we are not good. There are playmakers at WR the RBs have shown flashes, and the OL is rapidly improving. The defense has players at every level, though a little less at LB than I thought. I'm still blown away by how he shut the offense down completely against equally awaful teams like Tulane and USF but I've move on.I wouldn't use those words but people are going overboard blaming the coaches only. I've been critical of Diaco but at some point you might have to acknowledge that maybe part of the problem is that we just don't have the players. I know the BY likes to deal in black and white but in the real world more times than not it's a shade of grey.
It is called hyperbole.Referring to the players as manure is effed up. If you want to put nothing of the Army debacle on the coach is one thing but manure... really, when you know parents and recruits read these boards. Were not good, still should have been better than Army though.
The team that won their last 3 games under Weist would have beaten Army. Diaco needs more time but at the moment he is trending on the negative side. We won't know for 2 more years if he was the right hire, but as with Ppgdl when looking back you saw a negative trend which showed in year one.
It is called hyperbole.
It is called hyperbole.
Hey its the guy who wanted Whitmer over Cochran!Go stick your hyperbole - its not needed here.