- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 9,382
- Reaction Score
- 23,714
I don't want to excuse their poor first half performance, because it was terrible to watch, but you never circled the game against Stony Brook the Sunday after Thanksgiving at 4:00 on the calender when the schedule came out. Ideally you want your team to go balls to the wall every single minute, but if this team wasn't at least a little lethargic out there early in the game, I'd have to question if human nature was an actual concept or just a convenient scape goat for when people *k up in life (maybe it's both?). Regardless, I think you'll see the best of this team when they play N.C. State in MSG next week.
Now, regarding that second half, am I going out on a limb by suggesting it was the first good half this team played since the first half of the MSU game? I suppose they played decently in the second half of the Wake Forest game, but even that one had quite a few bumps in the road. Recently we have seen much closer to the product we expected this season than the product we saw in the opener. When Napier and Boatright choose to defer rather than attack, this team struggles mightily to score points. Not only is this team a bit limited in the talent department relative to past UConn teams, but we also tend to forget how young they are. Olander and Giffey are both juniors, but their playing time throughout their respective UConn careers has not really been consistent. Calhoun would play them 30 minutes one game, and 4 the next. This season at least they know they will see the floor 2
0-30 minutes a night barring foul trouble or an unforeseen explosion from Wolf or Calhoun. Omar is obviously a freshman, and Deandre didn't see many minutes last season once Big East play started. The continuity is clearly a work in progress, as is their individual development, both offensively and defensively.
I saw some people hinting in a separate thread that there might be some sort of fundamental flaw in the Napier/Boatright dynamic, but I just don't agree. Sure, there's a bit of a "you're turn, my turn" feel to it at times, specifically late in games, but I see no reason this can't work long-term, given they both appear to be selfless players. As I've written several times, the ability to put two guards on the court late in games who can get their shot whenever they want is not an advantage many teams have. Granted, each of them needs to improve their court vision, both for their NBA aspirations, and for the benefit of this team. One poster earlier made the observation that both of them drive to score rather than pass, and I couldn't agree more. This offense suddenly becomes quite potent when they explore both options (as in passing and scoring), because the defense has to collapse upon penetration, leaving capable shooters open from outside. You saw it in the second half: Boatright and Napier had the ball in their hands, and they simply carved up the Stony Brook defense. I completely understand the desire to involve the others in the offense, but there is a fine line between involving others and isolating players who do not have the ability to create (Daniels, Calhoun, Olander, just to name a few) offense for themselves. I'm not saying Napier and Boatright have to combine for 50 a game for this team to be successful, but EVERYTHING has to run through those two, otherwise you're going to see more 26 point first halves like we saw today. And when you score 26 points in the first half against a Syracuse, Louisville, or N.C. State, you're going to be down 20 at halftime and not five.
Some player notes:
Napier - All in all, he played a very good game today, but he needs to do more. Seven shot attempts isn't enough for a player of his talent level. I'm not asking him to be Kemba, but I do think he needs to take 15-20 shots a game for this team unless somebody else is hot.
Boatright - I'm not saying I'm disappointed in Boatright, but he's clearly not as good as I expected him to be. Thus far he's had a Kemba-like sophmore year, IMO, in that he hasn't quite pieced it together yet. He racked up seven assists today, but his decision making could use a lot of improvement. The most important aspect of playing the point guard position is knowing what to do once you beat the orgiginal defender off the dribble and get into the foul line area. Oftentimes, it's a split second decision, and it takes years for even the most talented players to master. Hell, even NBA veterans screw it up - you've got two, sometimes three defenders converging, and you have to anticipate their movements, and whether you should dump it to a big man, kick it back out, pull up, or take it all the way to the rim. Obviously, the preference among young guards like Boatright, and a young Kemba, is to take it all the way to the rim. Boatright needs to learn to utilize his other options, because he's not in high school anymore and he's only 5'10.
Calhoun - The talent is obviously there, and just a few games in, it seems that he's already progressing in terms of off-ball movement, and freeing himself for shots. Early in the second half he passed up a three pointer, took the ball towards the baseline, and sank a nice ten foot jumper. Earlier in the season he would have either taken a contested three, or taken it all the way to the basket and likely gotten blocked. It's these subtle movements that really separate freshman from sophmores and juniors. Luckily for us, I think Omar will get it sooner rather than later.
Giffey - No question he deserves the game ball today. He's such a nice piece for a coach to have - I think he's the only player on the team Coach Ollie doesn't have to worry about playing outside himself, which is both a blessing and a curse, because oftentimes I'll find myself yelling at the TV when he passes up a wide open three. I know Giffey has the reputation of a "glue guy" because he does all the little things (entry passes, defense, screens, rebounds, etc.), but I also think he could be one of our more prominant offensive players. He might even be the best shooter on the time after Shabazz.
Daniels - Deandre plays like a freshman. That shouldn't come as a surprise, because he played so sparringly last season and never really found a rhythm. He's clearly got a lot of talent (although I don't agree with whoever said pre-season that he was our best NBA prospect - I don't see that in him), but he makes more bad decisions than anybody on our team. Nothing better exhibits Deandre's game than when he tried to drive to the basket today and stepped out of bounds. There was nothing there, and it was a terrible decision. I think Deandre will be our most anemic player this season, and that's not neccessarily a knock on him. Some players grow into themselves sooner than others.
Olander - Earlier in the season it looked like Tyler might just hold his own in the Big East - now, I'm not so sure. He played very well in the first two games, blocking shots, rebounding, playing solid post defense, and providing some timely buckets. Since then, he looks like the mid-major player many of us suspected he was upon his arrival at UConn. Ultimately, somebody on the game thread put it best - he's a role player who has been thrust into an unfair position having to man the post for UConn. Some games we're going to get 30 solid minutes from him, and some games we'll be wishing he hadn't showed up to the gym. I think Calhoun treated him that way, which is why he was so quick with the hook when Olander did something stupid early in the game.
Wolf - was a non-factor today. Hopefully he can give us more than that going forward.
Lastly, call me a generous grader, but I'm inclined to put another check in the box for Coach Ollie. He looked legitimately pissed at halftime, and they were a completely different team in the second half. The sets were much crisper, they played harder, and obviously it helped that they made shots. If they lost to Stony Brook, that would have been a real concern. But so far Ollie has done enough to earn the job, IMO.
Now, regarding that second half, am I going out on a limb by suggesting it was the first good half this team played since the first half of the MSU game? I suppose they played decently in the second half of the Wake Forest game, but even that one had quite a few bumps in the road. Recently we have seen much closer to the product we expected this season than the product we saw in the opener. When Napier and Boatright choose to defer rather than attack, this team struggles mightily to score points. Not only is this team a bit limited in the talent department relative to past UConn teams, but we also tend to forget how young they are. Olander and Giffey are both juniors, but their playing time throughout their respective UConn careers has not really been consistent. Calhoun would play them 30 minutes one game, and 4 the next. This season at least they know they will see the floor 2
0-30 minutes a night barring foul trouble or an unforeseen explosion from Wolf or Calhoun. Omar is obviously a freshman, and Deandre didn't see many minutes last season once Big East play started. The continuity is clearly a work in progress, as is their individual development, both offensively and defensively.
I saw some people hinting in a separate thread that there might be some sort of fundamental flaw in the Napier/Boatright dynamic, but I just don't agree. Sure, there's a bit of a "you're turn, my turn" feel to it at times, specifically late in games, but I see no reason this can't work long-term, given they both appear to be selfless players. As I've written several times, the ability to put two guards on the court late in games who can get their shot whenever they want is not an advantage many teams have. Granted, each of them needs to improve their court vision, both for their NBA aspirations, and for the benefit of this team. One poster earlier made the observation that both of them drive to score rather than pass, and I couldn't agree more. This offense suddenly becomes quite potent when they explore both options (as in passing and scoring), because the defense has to collapse upon penetration, leaving capable shooters open from outside. You saw it in the second half: Boatright and Napier had the ball in their hands, and they simply carved up the Stony Brook defense. I completely understand the desire to involve the others in the offense, but there is a fine line between involving others and isolating players who do not have the ability to create (Daniels, Calhoun, Olander, just to name a few) offense for themselves. I'm not saying Napier and Boatright have to combine for 50 a game for this team to be successful, but EVERYTHING has to run through those two, otherwise you're going to see more 26 point first halves like we saw today. And when you score 26 points in the first half against a Syracuse, Louisville, or N.C. State, you're going to be down 20 at halftime and not five.
Some player notes:
Napier - All in all, he played a very good game today, but he needs to do more. Seven shot attempts isn't enough for a player of his talent level. I'm not asking him to be Kemba, but I do think he needs to take 15-20 shots a game for this team unless somebody else is hot.
Boatright - I'm not saying I'm disappointed in Boatright, but he's clearly not as good as I expected him to be. Thus far he's had a Kemba-like sophmore year, IMO, in that he hasn't quite pieced it together yet. He racked up seven assists today, but his decision making could use a lot of improvement. The most important aspect of playing the point guard position is knowing what to do once you beat the orgiginal defender off the dribble and get into the foul line area. Oftentimes, it's a split second decision, and it takes years for even the most talented players to master. Hell, even NBA veterans screw it up - you've got two, sometimes three defenders converging, and you have to anticipate their movements, and whether you should dump it to a big man, kick it back out, pull up, or take it all the way to the rim. Obviously, the preference among young guards like Boatright, and a young Kemba, is to take it all the way to the rim. Boatright needs to learn to utilize his other options, because he's not in high school anymore and he's only 5'10.
Calhoun - The talent is obviously there, and just a few games in, it seems that he's already progressing in terms of off-ball movement, and freeing himself for shots. Early in the second half he passed up a three pointer, took the ball towards the baseline, and sank a nice ten foot jumper. Earlier in the season he would have either taken a contested three, or taken it all the way to the basket and likely gotten blocked. It's these subtle movements that really separate freshman from sophmores and juniors. Luckily for us, I think Omar will get it sooner rather than later.
Giffey - No question he deserves the game ball today. He's such a nice piece for a coach to have - I think he's the only player on the team Coach Ollie doesn't have to worry about playing outside himself, which is both a blessing and a curse, because oftentimes I'll find myself yelling at the TV when he passes up a wide open three. I know Giffey has the reputation of a "glue guy" because he does all the little things (entry passes, defense, screens, rebounds, etc.), but I also think he could be one of our more prominant offensive players. He might even be the best shooter on the time after Shabazz.
Daniels - Deandre plays like a freshman. That shouldn't come as a surprise, because he played so sparringly last season and never really found a rhythm. He's clearly got a lot of talent (although I don't agree with whoever said pre-season that he was our best NBA prospect - I don't see that in him), but he makes more bad decisions than anybody on our team. Nothing better exhibits Deandre's game than when he tried to drive to the basket today and stepped out of bounds. There was nothing there, and it was a terrible decision. I think Deandre will be our most anemic player this season, and that's not neccessarily a knock on him. Some players grow into themselves sooner than others.
Olander - Earlier in the season it looked like Tyler might just hold his own in the Big East - now, I'm not so sure. He played very well in the first two games, blocking shots, rebounding, playing solid post defense, and providing some timely buckets. Since then, he looks like the mid-major player many of us suspected he was upon his arrival at UConn. Ultimately, somebody on the game thread put it best - he's a role player who has been thrust into an unfair position having to man the post for UConn. Some games we're going to get 30 solid minutes from him, and some games we'll be wishing he hadn't showed up to the gym. I think Calhoun treated him that way, which is why he was so quick with the hook when Olander did something stupid early in the game.
Wolf - was a non-factor today. Hopefully he can give us more than that going forward.
Lastly, call me a generous grader, but I'm inclined to put another check in the box for Coach Ollie. He looked legitimately pissed at halftime, and they were a completely different team in the second half. The sets were much crisper, they played harder, and obviously it helped that they made shots. If they lost to Stony Brook, that would have been a real concern. But so far Ollie has done enough to earn the job, IMO.