- Joined
- Apr 25, 2014
- Messages
- 5,290
- Reaction Score
- 19,770
Shaq was once in a hundred years type specimen.
If you think that a proper comparison to Shaq is David Robinson or Alonzo Mouring, then what the hell are we talking about?
There is no proper comparison, but the guy was still one of the very best players of all-time (ranks third in PER behind Jordan and LeBron), and was the NBA's dominant player for a five-year stretch. Literally he was the best player in the league every season for five years. If that's a player who didn't apply himself, then what do you think he should have been able to do? Win 10 championships? 10 MVPs?
Was Shaq better than those guys?
Shaq won one MVP, one.
MVP award voting is often wrong. The numbers show that Shaq was better than all of those guys, and the numbers are a factual representation of the events. Shaq was the best big man of his generation, and following Jordan's retirement, he was the league's best player for several years.