- Joined
- Apr 29, 2015
- Messages
- 17,062
- Reaction Score
- 68,071
The other 3 are UConn, ND, USCr
http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/bracketology
http://espn.go.com/womens-college-basketball/bracketology
They could - there's not many out there that can beat them. Are we having parity because so many teams are improving, or just because of widespread mediocrity? The only teams that seem to have a culture of excellence (besides UCONN) appear to be ND, SC (still developing that culture), and maybe Baylor.Texas will not see the Elite 8.
They could - there's not many out there that can beat them. Are we having parity because so many teams are improving, or just because of widespread mediocrity? The only teams that seem to have a culture of excellence (besides UCONN) appear to be ND, SC (still developing that culture), and maybe Baylor.
In fairness, Mudcat did say that SC was "still developing that culture". But very recent history - SC made the final 4 last season and is favored to do so this season. Right now SC is a 1 seed but Baylor is likely a 2 seed.South Carolina has a culture of excellence with one Final Four appearance and Baylor "maybe" has a culture of excellence with two NCAA championships?
In fairness, Mudcat did say that SC was "still developing that culture". But very recent history - SC made the final 4 last season and is favored to do so this season. Right now SC is a 1 seed but Baylor is likely a 2 seed.
Baylor may have won 2 NC's but they haven't been to the final 4 since 2012. Historically, I'd say Baylor is much further along than SC (Baylor with 2 NC's, 3 final 4's, and 8 elite 8's vs. SC's 2 final 4's (one was 1980) and 3 elite 8's. But I don't think Mud meant any insult to Baylor's tradition by his comments...
A lovely garden?! Certainly not a NC!I didn't interpret it as an intended insult, just a slight inaccuracy.
And it is way to soon to discuss 1 seeds considering that conference play just started. A projected number 1 seeds doesn't mean much unless you have UCONN on your jersey. I seem to remember Baylor being a 2 seed the year they beat three 1 seeds en route to a title in 2005. What did the number 1 seeds get those teams?
Ha!A lovely garden?! Certainly not a NC!
I think Muffett is better (and so does Geno). I'd say Geno, Muffet, Kim, Tara and then all the rest.Texas let Stewie, Mo, and KML, run wild all over them in Albany last regional bracket. However, the team is looking very good. Aston's squad is laden with young talent and an anchor in Imani Boyette (nee' Stafford). This might just be the year the Horns make the regional finals or the national semis.
Since Baylor has come up, I would be hard-pressed to name a better current WCBB coach than Kim Mulkey. I'd give the nods to Geno and Tara, but that's it. I'd even leave Muffet and Karen out of such a list.
For the last several years I haven't been able to print up the BRACKETOLOGY off Charlie Creme's page. I have to hand write it up and it's a pain! I've tried just printing the page and there are no brackets just one long line of schools on the left side of the page for 14 or so pages or print preview where it's all jumbled!
Has anyone found the same problem?
I used to been able to print it up, 3 or 4 years ago.
Why wouldn't Charlie Creme want it printable?
Texas let Stewie, Mo, and KML, run wild all over them in Albany last regional bracket. However, the team is looking very good. Aston's squad is laden with young talent and an anchor in Imani Boyette (nee' Stafford). This might just be the year the Horns make the regional finals or the national semis.
Since Baylor has come up, I would be hard-pressed to name a better current WCBB coach than Kim Mulkey. I'd give the nods to Geno and Tara, but that's it. I'd even leave Muffet and Karen out of such a list.
Just finished watching Texas play Iowa St.
Texas really could become a threat, if they continue to get better.I like how they have a choice to play any style Tall or Fast.Texas has a lot of weapons.
We're talking about coaches, not potential dates.Ugh; Mulkey is insufferable.
We're talking about coaches, not potential dates.