For me, as the father of 3 daughters who competed in a variety of sports, that article was a very difficult read. As a retired attorney who had a sizeable slice of his practice in employment discrimination law it did not read any better with that hat on. Much of the discrimination case law involving universities has to do with tenure and equal pay cases among the teaching staff. Those cases have always been very difficult for plaintiffs, in principal part because the decision making is inherently subjective. Absent a smoking gun, most of those cases have been lost by the plaintiffs and often before trial. These unfortunate facts have imbued university administrations with even more insular arrogance than is their wont to develop as a byproduct of their position in society. Add to that the desire to perpetuate a culture which they see as appealing to alumni donors and you have a perfect storm of factors making biased decision making an institutional norm.
The article states facts that glaringly suggest(one could say demonstrate) that Pat Summit flip flopped. I suspect she was bullied into that at a time of great personal stress and vulnerability. It is a sad tale all around.