I wish to take issue with few posters that elevated Horston’s performance to the point where it sounded like she was the best player in the game, which was clearly not nearly the case. I agree with the comment that she is “a real athlete with some nice skills”. But I think saying her game tonight was “terrific” or “a most perfect game” is way over the (Rocky) top! Yes she scored 27 points which was one more than Lou. But it took her 22 shots from the floor (45% FG avg) complemented with 5 free throws (based IMHO on some questionable foul calls) to get there. Lou got all of her points on just 16 floor shots (69%!) with no trips to the line (even though, IMHO she was pushed around all night). Horston had 6 turnovers (count ‘em - six!) and a +/- number of -9 (that’s right - minus nine!). The way I see it, we’re talking Hailey Van Lith on steroids here!
Lou Lopez-Senechal was, by far the MOP of that game followed by AE and the other starters for UConn(look at all of the +/- numbers for every player in the game). To put someone with a 24% lower FG average, six turnovers and a +/- number of -9 on a similar level with credits like “terrific’ and “most perfect game“ is IMHO questionable at best and downright Husky blasphemy at best!